Access to cannabis retail stores across Canada 6 months following legalization: a descriptive study.

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20190012
D. Myran, Catherine R L Brown, P. Tanuseputro
{"title":"Access to cannabis retail stores across Canada 6 months following legalization: a descriptive study.","authors":"D. Myran, Catherine R L Brown, P. Tanuseputro","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20190012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nOn Oct. 17, 2018, Canada legalized recreational cannabis with the dual goals of reducing youth use and eliminating the illicit cannabis market. We examined factors associated with access to physical cannabis stores across Canada 6 months following legalization.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe extracted the address and operating hours of all legal cannabis stores in Canada from online government and private listings. We conducted a descriptive study examining the association between private/hybrid (mixture of government and private stores) and government-only retail models with 4 measures of physical access to cannabis: store density, weekly hours of operation, median distance to the nearest school and relative availability of cannabis stores between low- and high-income neighbourhoods.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSix months after legalization, there were 260 cannabis retail stores across Canada: 181 privately run stores, 55 government-run stores and 24 stores in the hybrid retail system. Compared to jurisdictions with a government-run model, jurisdictions with a private/hybrid retail model had 49% (95% confidence interval 10%-200%) more stores per capita, retailers were open on average 9.2 more hours per week, and stores were located closer to schools (median 166.7 m). In both retail models, there was over twice the concentration of cannabis stores in neighbourhoods in the lowest income quintile compared to the highest income quintile.\n\n\nINTERPRETATION\nMarked differences in physical access to cannabis retail are emerging between jurisdictions with private/hybrid retail models and those with government-only retail models. Ongoing surveillance including monitoring differences in cannabis use and harms across jurisdictions is needed.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.9778/cmajo.20190012","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

BACKGROUND On Oct. 17, 2018, Canada legalized recreational cannabis with the dual goals of reducing youth use and eliminating the illicit cannabis market. We examined factors associated with access to physical cannabis stores across Canada 6 months following legalization. METHODS We extracted the address and operating hours of all legal cannabis stores in Canada from online government and private listings. We conducted a descriptive study examining the association between private/hybrid (mixture of government and private stores) and government-only retail models with 4 measures of physical access to cannabis: store density, weekly hours of operation, median distance to the nearest school and relative availability of cannabis stores between low- and high-income neighbourhoods. RESULTS Six months after legalization, there were 260 cannabis retail stores across Canada: 181 privately run stores, 55 government-run stores and 24 stores in the hybrid retail system. Compared to jurisdictions with a government-run model, jurisdictions with a private/hybrid retail model had 49% (95% confidence interval 10%-200%) more stores per capita, retailers were open on average 9.2 more hours per week, and stores were located closer to schools (median 166.7 m). In both retail models, there was over twice the concentration of cannabis stores in neighbourhoods in the lowest income quintile compared to the highest income quintile. INTERPRETATION Marked differences in physical access to cannabis retail are emerging between jurisdictions with private/hybrid retail models and those with government-only retail models. Ongoing surveillance including monitoring differences in cannabis use and harms across jurisdictions is needed.
合法化后6个月进入加拿大各地的大麻零售店:一项描述性研究。
背景2018年10月17日,加拿大将娱乐性大麻合法化,其双重目标是减少青少年使用和消除非法大麻市场。我们研究了在合法化6个月后,加拿大各地进入实体大麻商店的相关因素。方法我们从政府和私人的在线列表中提取了加拿大所有合法大麻商店的地址和营业时间。我们进行了一项描述性研究,研究了私人/混合型(政府和私人商店的混合物)和仅政府零售模式之间的关系,并对大麻的实际获取情况进行了4项衡量:商店密度、每周营业时间、到最近学校的中位距离以及低收入和高收入社区之间大麻商店的相对可用性。结果合法化六个月后,加拿大共有260家大麻零售店:181家私人经营的商店、55家政府经营的商店和24家混合零售系统商店。与采用政府经营模式的司法管辖区相比,采用私人/混合零售模式的司法辖区的人均门店数增加了49%(95%置信区间10%-200%),零售商平均每周营业9.2小时,门店距离学校更近(中位数1.667亿)。在这两种零售模式中,收入最低的五分之一人群的大麻商店集中度是收入最高的五分之二人群的两倍多。解释采用私人/混合零售模式的司法管辖区与仅采用政府零售模式的管辖区在大麻零售的实际获取方面出现了显著差异。需要持续监测,包括监测不同司法管辖区大麻使用和危害的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信