When Everything Changes, Everything Stays the Same: The Queer Paradox of Quarantine Pods

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION
M. Morrissey
{"title":"When Everything Changes, Everything Stays the Same: The Queer Paradox of Quarantine Pods","authors":"M. Morrissey","doi":"10.1080/07491409.2021.2021774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the practice of podding was encouraged in public discourse as a way to manage the isolation and stress many people experienced. While described as a creative mode of relationality that extended traditional nuclear family units, the public discourse about forming quarantine pods during the COVID-19 pandemic was a strategic bordering practice. Even though some community members (LGBTQIA+ and otherwise) celebrated the resilient ways in which queer experiences could model these nonnormative intimacies, public discourses about pandemic podding limited the potential to imagine new ways of being, often further entrenching normative ideals of citizenship and heteronormative family making. Although uncharted modes of relationality such as podding offer the promise of inclusive, radical, and generative futures, the reactive, bounded, and formalistic construction of pandemic pods never fully materialized that future.","PeriodicalId":46136,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies in Communication","volume":"45 1","pages":"26 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2021.2021774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the practice of podding was encouraged in public discourse as a way to manage the isolation and stress many people experienced. While described as a creative mode of relationality that extended traditional nuclear family units, the public discourse about forming quarantine pods during the COVID-19 pandemic was a strategic bordering practice. Even though some community members (LGBTQIA+ and otherwise) celebrated the resilient ways in which queer experiences could model these nonnormative intimacies, public discourses about pandemic podding limited the potential to imagine new ways of being, often further entrenching normative ideals of citizenship and heteronormative family making. Although uncharted modes of relationality such as podding offer the promise of inclusive, radical, and generative futures, the reactive, bounded, and formalistic construction of pandemic pods never fully materialized that future.
当一切都改变了,一切都保持不变:隔离舱的酷儿悖论
摘要在新冠肺炎疫情最严重的时候,公共话语中鼓励了podding的做法,以此来管理许多人所经历的孤立和压力。虽然被描述为一种创造性的关系模式,扩展了传统的核心家庭单元,但在新冠肺炎大流行期间,关于形成隔离舱的公共讨论是一种战略边缘实践。尽管一些社区成员(LGBTQIA+和其他)庆祝酷儿经历可以塑造这些非规范亲密关系的弹性方式,但关于疫情的公开讨论限制了想象新生活方式的潜力,往往会进一步巩固公民身份和非规范家庭的规范理想。尽管播客等未知的关系模式提供了包容性、激进性和生成性未来的承诺,但疫情播客的反应性、有界性和形式主义构建从未完全实现这一未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信