Investigating green investment payoff in China

IF 2.1 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Qi Chen, Mary Low
{"title":"Investigating green investment payoff in China","authors":"Qi Chen, Mary Low","doi":"10.1108/par-07-2020-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to use Porter’s hypothesis (PH), which tests whether corporates’ green investment has an impact on their economic performance (EP). The study argues that corporates’ environmental strategy should allow for a “win-win” situation concerning regulatory compliance.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe quantitative methodology used PH to test empirically the economic consequences of corporates’ green investment in China.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study indicates that there is a U-shaped relationship between green/environmental investment (EI) and EP. When EI is less, corporates’ EP follows a downward sloping curve until the scale of EI increases and exceeds the “threshold.” From this turning point, EP follows an upward-sloping curve as EI increase. This relationship is more significant in high-polluting companies and state-owned companies.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe empirical results extend the research field of EI and EP for listed companies in China and cover 1,324 observations over the period 2008–2017.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFirst, the authors expand the research on green/EI and EP using firm-level data. Second, the study empirically tests the economic consequences of corporates’ green investment. Third, this study finds a non-linear relationship between green investment and EP due to the heterogeneity of industry attributes and property rights. These findings provide better explanations for the different research conclusions regarding the economic consequences of green investment.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nCompared to global research, China’s research on EI has mainly focused on the macro and industry levels. There is still a lack of micro-level research. The paper addresses this research gap as the authors use firm-level EI data to capture companies’ green investment efforts in environmentally sustainable development and its subsequent impact on EP.\n","PeriodicalId":46088,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Accounting Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/par-07-2020-0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to use Porter’s hypothesis (PH), which tests whether corporates’ green investment has an impact on their economic performance (EP). The study argues that corporates’ environmental strategy should allow for a “win-win” situation concerning regulatory compliance. Design/methodology/approach The quantitative methodology used PH to test empirically the economic consequences of corporates’ green investment in China. Findings This study indicates that there is a U-shaped relationship between green/environmental investment (EI) and EP. When EI is less, corporates’ EP follows a downward sloping curve until the scale of EI increases and exceeds the “threshold.” From this turning point, EP follows an upward-sloping curve as EI increase. This relationship is more significant in high-polluting companies and state-owned companies. Research limitations/implications The empirical results extend the research field of EI and EP for listed companies in China and cover 1,324 observations over the period 2008–2017. Practical implications First, the authors expand the research on green/EI and EP using firm-level data. Second, the study empirically tests the economic consequences of corporates’ green investment. Third, this study finds a non-linear relationship between green investment and EP due to the heterogeneity of industry attributes and property rights. These findings provide better explanations for the different research conclusions regarding the economic consequences of green investment. Originality/value Compared to global research, China’s research on EI has mainly focused on the macro and industry levels. There is still a lack of micro-level research. The paper addresses this research gap as the authors use firm-level EI data to capture companies’ green investment efforts in environmentally sustainable development and its subsequent impact on EP.
中国绿色投资回报调查
本研究旨在使用波特假设(Porter’s hypothesis, PH)来检验企业的绿色投资是否对其经济绩效(EP)产生影响。该研究认为,企业的环境战略应考虑到监管合规方面的“双赢”局面。设计/方法/途径定量方法采用PH对中国企业绿色投资的经济后果进行实证检验。研究发现:绿色环境投资(EI)与经济效益呈u型关系。当EI较低时,企业的EP呈向下倾斜的曲线,直到EI的规模增加并超过“阈值”。从这个拐点开始,EP随着EI的增加呈上升曲线。这种关系在高污染企业和国有企业中更为显著。研究局限/启示实证结果扩展了中国上市公司EI和EP的研究领域,涵盖了2008-2017年期间的1324个观察结果。首先,作者利用企业层面的数据拓展了绿色经济效益和环境效益的研究。其次,实证检验了企业绿色投资的经济后果。第三,由于产业属性和产权的异质性,绿色投资与环境效益之间存在非线性关系。这些发现为绿色投资经济后果的不同研究结论提供了更好的解释。与全球研究相比,中国对EI的研究主要集中在宏观和行业层面。微观层面的研究仍然缺乏。本文解决了这一研究缺口,作者使用企业层面的EI数据来捕捉企业在环境可持续发展方面的绿色投资努力及其对EP的后续影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pacific Accounting Review
Pacific Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Pacific Accounting Review is a quarterly journal publishing original research papers and book reviews. The journal is supported by all New Zealand Universities and has the backing of academics from many universities in the Pacific region. The journal publishes papers from both empirical and theoretical forms of research into current developments in accounting and finance and provides insight into how present practice is shaped and formed. Specific areas include but are not limited to: - Emerging Markets and Economies - Political/Social contexts - Financial Reporting - Auditing and Governance - Management Accounting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信