Demographic characteristics and cost of treatment among oncology patients in a publicly funded system, the Ontario Trillium Drug Program: a retrospective cohort study.

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20190011
Stephanie Y Cheng, F. Saxena, S. Seung, C. Earle, Kelvin K. W. Chan, N. Mittmann
{"title":"Demographic characteristics and cost of treatment among oncology patients in a publicly funded system, the Ontario Trillium Drug Program: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Stephanie Y Cheng, F. Saxena, S. Seung, C. Earle, Kelvin K. W. Chan, N. Mittmann","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20190011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe aim of this study was to characterize the demographic characteristics and investigate the cost of a publicly funded system, the Ontario Trillium Drug Program (TDP), for an oncology patient population.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe ascertained all TDP claims between April 1997 and December 2016 from the Ontario Drug Benefit database to assess use and cost. Each drug was classified as a cancer treatment drug, cancer supportive therapy drug or noncancer drug. We also identified a cohort of patients with cancer with least 1 TDP claim, for whom we examined demographic and claims-related characteristics.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOver the study period, 50 975 293 TDP claims totalling $4.8 billion were made. Although the proportion of cancer claims among all TDP claims remained constant between 1997 and 2016, the total annual cost of cancer treatment drugs increased nearly 40-fold. Imatinib and lenalidomide together accounted for nearly half of the cost of all cancer treatment drugs. We identified a cohort of 49 892 patients with cancer, of whom 18 631 (37.3%) were enrolled in the TDP before their cancer diagnosis and 31 261 (62.7%) were enrolled after their diagnosis. The former were more likely than the latter to be in lower income quintiles and to have more chronic conditions. Significant differences were also found in the distribution of cancer diagnoses between the 2 groups.\n\n\nINTERPRETATION\nIn the TDP, use increased over time and differed across cancer diagnoses and drugs. These results have public health and policy implications as antineoplastic drug costs continue to rise and place a burden on patients.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.9778/cmajo.20190011","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to characterize the demographic characteristics and investigate the cost of a publicly funded system, the Ontario Trillium Drug Program (TDP), for an oncology patient population. METHODS We ascertained all TDP claims between April 1997 and December 2016 from the Ontario Drug Benefit database to assess use and cost. Each drug was classified as a cancer treatment drug, cancer supportive therapy drug or noncancer drug. We also identified a cohort of patients with cancer with least 1 TDP claim, for whom we examined demographic and claims-related characteristics. RESULTS Over the study period, 50 975 293 TDP claims totalling $4.8 billion were made. Although the proportion of cancer claims among all TDP claims remained constant between 1997 and 2016, the total annual cost of cancer treatment drugs increased nearly 40-fold. Imatinib and lenalidomide together accounted for nearly half of the cost of all cancer treatment drugs. We identified a cohort of 49 892 patients with cancer, of whom 18 631 (37.3%) were enrolled in the TDP before their cancer diagnosis and 31 261 (62.7%) were enrolled after their diagnosis. The former were more likely than the latter to be in lower income quintiles and to have more chronic conditions. Significant differences were also found in the distribution of cancer diagnoses between the 2 groups. INTERPRETATION In the TDP, use increased over time and differed across cancer diagnoses and drugs. These results have public health and policy implications as antineoplastic drug costs continue to rise and place a burden on patients.
人口统计学特征和治疗费用的肿瘤患者在一个公共资助的系统,安大略万亿药物计划:一个回顾性队列研究。
背景本研究的目的是描述人口统计学特征,并调查安大略延龄草药物计划(TDP)这一公共资助系统对肿瘤患者群体的成本。方法我们从安大略省药品福利数据库中确定了1997年4月至2016年12月期间的所有TDP索赔,以评估使用和成本。每种药物都被分类为癌症治疗药物、癌症支持治疗药物或非癌症药物。我们还确定了一组至少有1个TDP索赔的癌症患者,我们检查了他们的人口统计学和索赔相关特征。结果在研究期间,共提出了50 975 293 TDP索赔,总额为48亿美元。尽管癌症索赔在所有TDP索赔中的比例在1997年至2016年间保持不变,但癌症治疗药物的年度总成本增长了近40倍。伊马替尼和来那度胺合计占所有癌症治疗药物成本的近一半。我们确定了一个由49892名癌症患者组成的队列,其中18631人(37.3%)在诊断癌症前加入TDP,31261人(62.7%)在诊断后加入TDP。前者比后者更有可能处于低收入的五分之一人群中,并患有更慢性的疾病。两组之间癌症诊断的分布也存在显著差异。解释在TDP中,使用随着时间的推移而增加,并且在癌症诊断和药物中有所不同。这些结果对公共卫生和政策有影响,因为抗肿瘤药物的成本持续上升,给患者带来了负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信