Unsilencing the Echoes of Historical Trauma: A Comparative Analysis

Lorinda Riley, Anamalia Suʻesuʻe, Meldrick Ravida
{"title":"Unsilencing the Echoes of Historical Trauma: A Comparative Analysis","authors":"Lorinda Riley, Anamalia Suʻesuʻe, Meldrick Ravida","doi":"10.3390/traumacare3020008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indigenous communities in North America have distinct colonial histories with their own story of how their ancestors were able to survive the mass effort to take their land, resources, language, culture, and sometimes even their lives. These stories have been passed down orally and through the DNA of the descendants of survivors via epigenetics. The Historical Loss Scale (HLS) and Historical Loss Associated Symptoms Scale (HLASS) are two validated scales that measure historical trauma among Native Americans. However, as different Indigenous communities have different colonial histories, it is critical to ensure that tools used to measure historical trauma are valid for that specific communities. When these scales are applied to Native Hawaiians, these measures may not provide an accurate picture of the historical trauma experienced by Native Hawaiians. As part of the effort to adapt the HLS for Native Hawaiians, we conducted a crosswalk analysis of the HLS and HLASS with a recent study on Native Hawaiian historical trauma (NHHT) to identify areas of overlap and divergence. We found that while there was significant overlap, several areas of divergence emerged likely stemming from the unique colonial histories of different Indigenous communities.","PeriodicalId":75251,"journal":{"name":"Trauma care (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma care (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare3020008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Indigenous communities in North America have distinct colonial histories with their own story of how their ancestors were able to survive the mass effort to take their land, resources, language, culture, and sometimes even their lives. These stories have been passed down orally and through the DNA of the descendants of survivors via epigenetics. The Historical Loss Scale (HLS) and Historical Loss Associated Symptoms Scale (HLASS) are two validated scales that measure historical trauma among Native Americans. However, as different Indigenous communities have different colonial histories, it is critical to ensure that tools used to measure historical trauma are valid for that specific communities. When these scales are applied to Native Hawaiians, these measures may not provide an accurate picture of the historical trauma experienced by Native Hawaiians. As part of the effort to adapt the HLS for Native Hawaiians, we conducted a crosswalk analysis of the HLS and HLASS with a recent study on Native Hawaiian historical trauma (NHHT) to identify areas of overlap and divergence. We found that while there was significant overlap, several areas of divergence emerged likely stemming from the unique colonial histories of different Indigenous communities.
消除历史创伤的回声:一个比较分析
北美的土著社区有着独特的殖民历史,他们自己的故事讲述了他们的祖先是如何在大规模的努力中生存下来的,这些努力夺走了他们的土地、资源、语言、文化,有时甚至夺走了他们的生命。这些故事通过口头流传下来,并通过表观遗传学通过幸存者后代的DNA流传下来。历史损失量表(HLS)和历史损失相关症状量表(HLASS)是两个经过验证的测量美洲原住民历史创伤的量表。然而,由于不同的土著社区有不同的殖民历史,确保用于衡量历史创伤的工具对特定社区有效是至关重要的。当这些尺度应用于夏威夷原住民时,这些措施可能无法准确描述夏威夷原住民所经历的历史创伤。作为使HLS适应夏威夷原住民的努力的一部分,我们对HLS和hass进行了人行横道分析,并结合最近对夏威夷原住民历史创伤(NHHT)的研究,以确定重叠和分歧的区域。我们发现,虽然有显著的重叠,但几个领域的分歧可能源于不同土著社区独特的殖民历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信