Influence of eugenol-based materials and cleaning procedures previously to resin composite restoration on microleakage after 1-year storage

IF 1.68 Q2 Dentistry
Murilo Baena Lopes, Klissia Romero Felizardo, Renan Hideki Kaneshima, Sandrine Berger Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil Guiraldo, Alcides Gonini Júnior
{"title":"Influence of eugenol-based materials and cleaning procedures previously to resin composite restoration on microleakage after 1-year storage","authors":"Murilo Baena Lopes,&nbsp;Klissia Romero Felizardo,&nbsp;Renan Hideki Kaneshima,&nbsp;Sandrine Berger Guiraldo,&nbsp;Ricardo Danil Guiraldo,&nbsp;Alcides Gonini Júnior","doi":"10.1186/s40563-016-0072-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The interference of eugenol on the adhesive systems and composite polymerization could promote a higher marginal microleakage. This could be reduced by mechanical and chemical cleansing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the previous use of eugenol-based materials to a permanent restoration on the marginal microleakage. The influence of mechanical cleansing associated with chemical cleansing with chlorhexidine gel was also evaluated. Non-eugenol endodontic sealer and temporary material and mechanical cleansing was used as a control. Eighty bovine incisors were endodontic treated and divided into eight groups (n?=?10) according to the sealer, temporary material and removal method. The specimens were temporarily restored and stored for 1?week at 37?°C and 100?% relative humidity, followed by definitive restoration and one-year storage at the same environment. The teeth were then sealed, immersed in silver nitrate at 50?% for 2?h and sectioned to have the microleakage qualitatively and quantitatively visually analyzed under a stereomicroscope at 45×. The percentage data were submitted to an ANOVA and Tukey’s test, and the scores were submitted to a Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s test at 5?% of the significance level. There was no difference between the groups when mechanical removal was made (p?&gt;?0.05). When chlorhexidine was used, the group that used endodontic eugenol based material as a sealer and the resin-based material as a temporary restoration showed less microleakage than the other (p?&lt;?0.05). All groups showed less microleakage when chlorhexidine was used instead of solely using mechanical removal (p?&lt;?0.05). For scores, when the eugenol based sealer was combined with resin-based temporary material, and when the resin sealer was combined with eugenol based temporary material using chlorhexidine, a lower median was found (p?&lt;?0.05) compared to all other groups. Eugenol showed no influence, and chlorhexidine gel showed to be effective in reducing microleakage.</p>","PeriodicalId":464,"journal":{"name":"Applied Adhesion Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6800,"publicationDate":"2016-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-016-0072-6","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Adhesion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-016-0072-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The interference of eugenol on the adhesive systems and composite polymerization could promote a higher marginal microleakage. This could be reduced by mechanical and chemical cleansing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the previous use of eugenol-based materials to a permanent restoration on the marginal microleakage. The influence of mechanical cleansing associated with chemical cleansing with chlorhexidine gel was also evaluated. Non-eugenol endodontic sealer and temporary material and mechanical cleansing was used as a control. Eighty bovine incisors were endodontic treated and divided into eight groups (n?=?10) according to the sealer, temporary material and removal method. The specimens were temporarily restored and stored for 1?week at 37?°C and 100?% relative humidity, followed by definitive restoration and one-year storage at the same environment. The teeth were then sealed, immersed in silver nitrate at 50?% for 2?h and sectioned to have the microleakage qualitatively and quantitatively visually analyzed under a stereomicroscope at 45×. The percentage data were submitted to an ANOVA and Tukey’s test, and the scores were submitted to a Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s test at 5?% of the significance level. There was no difference between the groups when mechanical removal was made (p?>?0.05). When chlorhexidine was used, the group that used endodontic eugenol based material as a sealer and the resin-based material as a temporary restoration showed less microleakage than the other (p?<?0.05). All groups showed less microleakage when chlorhexidine was used instead of solely using mechanical removal (p?<?0.05). For scores, when the eugenol based sealer was combined with resin-based temporary material, and when the resin sealer was combined with eugenol based temporary material using chlorhexidine, a lower median was found (p?<?0.05) compared to all other groups. Eugenol showed no influence, and chlorhexidine gel showed to be effective in reducing microleakage.

Abstract Image

丁香酚基材料及前期清洗工艺对树脂复合材料修复1年后微渗漏的影响
丁香酚对胶粘剂体系和复合聚合的干扰会导致较高的边际微泄漏。这可以通过机械和化学清洗来减少。本研究的目的是评估先前使用的丁香酚基材料对边缘微渗漏的永久性修复的影响。同时对机械清洗和氯己定凝胶化学清洗的影响进行了评价。非丁香酚根管封闭剂、临时材料和机械清洁作为对照。对80只牛门牙进行根管治疗,根据封闭剂、临时材料和拔除方法分为8组(n = 10)。这些标本被暂时修复并保存了1?37岁?°C和100?%的相对湿度,然后在相同的环境下进行最终修复和一年的储存。然后将牙齿密封,浸入50度的硝酸银中。% 2?在45倍的立体显微镜下,对微渗漏进行定性和定量的视觉分析。百分比数据提交方差分析和Tukey检验,分数提交Kruskal-Wallis和Dunn的5?%的显著性水平。机械去除组间差异无统计学意义(p >?0.05)。使用氯己定时,牙髓中使用丁香酚基材料作为封闭剂和树脂基材料作为临时修复剂组的微渗漏较少(p <?0.05)。与单纯机械去除相比,使用氯己定治疗组微渗漏较少(p <?0.05)。对于分数,当丁香酚基封口剂与树脂基临时材料联合使用,以及树脂封口剂与丁香酚基临时材料使用氯己定联合使用时,与其他所有组相比,中位数较低(p?<?0.05)。丁香酚对微渗漏无影响,氯己定凝胶对微渗漏有抑制作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Adhesion Science
Applied Adhesion Science Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Adhesion Science focuses on practical applications of adhesives, with special emphasis in fields such as oil industry, aerospace and biomedicine. Topics related to the phenomena of adhesion and the application of adhesive materials are welcome, especially in biomedical areas such as adhesive dentistry. Both theoretical and experimental works are considered for publication. Applied Adhesion Science is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal''s open access policy offers a fast publication workflow whilst maintaining rigorous peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信