MEDIATION FOR INDONESIAN TAX DISPUTES: IS IT POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVE STRATEGY FOR RESOLVING INDONESIAN TAX DISPUTES?

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Khoirul Hidayah, Suhariningsih, Istislam, I. Permadi
{"title":"MEDIATION FOR INDONESIAN TAX DISPUTES: IS IT POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVE STRATEGY FOR RESOLVING INDONESIAN TAX DISPUTES?","authors":"Khoirul Hidayah, Suhariningsih, Istislam, I. Permadi","doi":"10.15742/ilrev.v8n2.486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tax dispute resolution in Indonesia has not yet met the principles of quick, simple, and economical. Taxpayers have to wait more than 3 years for the lawful certainty. This paper elaborates the potential strategy in resolving the tax dispute in Indonesia through administrative law. OECD has suggested taxpayers and revenue body to build positive connection through the changing of confrontation to the collaborative relationship. Mediation is a solution to encourage this positive bond in solving the dispute. It is successfully implemented in Australia. The similar way is strongly recommended for the Indonesian Government to develop a good relationship between taxpayers and revenue body. One of the chances for mediating in an attempt to minimize tax dispute is in the auditing process. This process cannot be easily done because it needs political will and high desired improvement from the Government to make a change. Mediation is an attempt to achieve a win-win solution and is in line with the principles of Pancasila, that is a deliberation for reaching an agreement. If it is done, then mediation will be a courteous way in tax dispute resolution and will be able to improve a good post-dispute relationship in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":13484,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v8n2.486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tax dispute resolution in Indonesia has not yet met the principles of quick, simple, and economical. Taxpayers have to wait more than 3 years for the lawful certainty. This paper elaborates the potential strategy in resolving the tax dispute in Indonesia through administrative law. OECD has suggested taxpayers and revenue body to build positive connection through the changing of confrontation to the collaborative relationship. Mediation is a solution to encourage this positive bond in solving the dispute. It is successfully implemented in Australia. The similar way is strongly recommended for the Indonesian Government to develop a good relationship between taxpayers and revenue body. One of the chances for mediating in an attempt to minimize tax dispute is in the auditing process. This process cannot be easily done because it needs political will and high desired improvement from the Government to make a change. Mediation is an attempt to achieve a win-win solution and is in line with the principles of Pancasila, that is a deliberation for reaching an agreement. If it is done, then mediation will be a courteous way in tax dispute resolution and will be able to improve a good post-dispute relationship in Indonesia.
印尼税务纠纷调解:这是解决印尼税务纠纷的潜在替代策略吗?
印尼的税务纠纷解决还没有达到快速、简单、经济的原则。纳税人必须等待3年以上的法律确定性。本文阐述了通过行政法解决印尼税务纠纷的潜在策略。经合组织建议纳税人和税收机构通过将对抗关系转变为合作关系来建立积极的联系。调解是鼓励这种积极纽带解决争端的一种解决办法。它在澳大利亚成功实施。强烈建议印尼政府以类似的方式发展纳税人和税收机构之间的良好关系。为尽量减少税务纠纷而进行调解的机会之一是在审计过程中。这一进程不可能轻易完成,因为它需要政府的政治意愿和高度期望的改进才能做出改变。调解是实现双赢解决方案的一种尝试,符合Pancasila的原则,即为达成协议而进行的审议。如果这样做了,那么调解将是解决税务纠纷的一种礼貌方式,并将能够改善印尼良好的纠纷后关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信