Towards a standardized annotation of rhyme judgments in Chinese historical phonology (and beyond)

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Johann-Mattis List, N. Hill, Christopher J. Foster
{"title":"Towards a standardized annotation of rhyme judgments in Chinese historical phonology (and beyond)","authors":"Johann-Mattis List, N. Hill, Christopher J. Foster","doi":"10.31826/jlr-2019-171-207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although rhyme analysis plays a crucial role in the reconstruction of Old Chinese phonology, the field has not yet developed a standardized annotation framework for rhyme judgments applied to Ancient Chinese texts. Building on initial attempts to standardize crosslinguistic data for the purpose of historical and typological language comparison (as part of \nthe Cross-Linguistic Data Formats initiative), we present a proposal for consistent and transparent rhyme annotation. This proposal allows scholars to annotate the rhymes they identify \nin historical texts in such a way that the judgments can be analyzed with computational tools \nas well as conveniently inspected by scholars. Our framework is accompanied by software \ntools and exemplary datasets, which were annotated by various scholars, and reflect not only \nChinese, but also contemporary poetry in different languages. In the paper, we present the \nframework and also point to caveats and current insufficiencies in annotation. In doing so, \nwe hope to inspire more scholars working on Old Chinese reconstruction to share their \njudgments, allowing others working in the field to improve, revise, and analyze them.","PeriodicalId":52215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Relationship","volume":"17 1","pages":"26 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Relationship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31826/jlr-2019-171-207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Although rhyme analysis plays a crucial role in the reconstruction of Old Chinese phonology, the field has not yet developed a standardized annotation framework for rhyme judgments applied to Ancient Chinese texts. Building on initial attempts to standardize crosslinguistic data for the purpose of historical and typological language comparison (as part of the Cross-Linguistic Data Formats initiative), we present a proposal for consistent and transparent rhyme annotation. This proposal allows scholars to annotate the rhymes they identify in historical texts in such a way that the judgments can be analyzed with computational tools as well as conveniently inspected by scholars. Our framework is accompanied by software tools and exemplary datasets, which were annotated by various scholars, and reflect not only Chinese, but also contemporary poetry in different languages. In the paper, we present the framework and also point to caveats and current insufficiencies in annotation. In doing so, we hope to inspire more scholars working on Old Chinese reconstruction to share their judgments, allowing others working in the field to improve, revise, and analyze them.
汉语历史音韵学(及以后)押韵判断的规范化注释
尽管押韵分析在古汉语音系重建中起着至关重要的作用,但该领域尚未形成一个适用于古汉语文本押韵判断的标准化注释框架。基于对跨语言数据标准化的初步尝试(作为跨语言数据格式倡议的一部分),我们提出了一致和透明的押韵注释的建议。这一提议允许学者们对他们在历史文本中发现的押韵进行注释,这样就可以用计算工具对判断进行分析,也可以方便地由学者进行检查。我们的框架配有软件工具和范例数据集,这些数据集由多位学者注释,不仅反映了中文,还反映了不同语言的当代诗歌。在本文中,我们提出了框架,并指出了注释方面的注意事项和当前的不足之处。通过这样做,我们希望激励更多从事古汉语重建的学者分享他们的判断,让其他在该领域工作的人能够改进、修改和分析这些判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Language Relationship
Journal of Language Relationship Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信