Analysis of dependencies between Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale test and Berg Balance Scale test as an assessment of the increased muscle tone in chronic-phase patients after a ischemic stroke

Q4 Medicine
M. Goliwąs, Joanna Małecka, J. Lewandowski, E. Kamińska, K. Adamczewska, P. Kocur
{"title":"Analysis of dependencies between Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale test and Berg Balance Scale test as an assessment of the increased muscle tone in chronic-phase patients after a ischemic stroke","authors":"M. Goliwąs, Joanna Małecka, J. Lewandowski, E. Kamińska, K. Adamczewska, P. Kocur","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.8241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The basic functional assessment, on the basis of which rehabilitation programming is carried out in a patient after a stroke, consists in examining the efficiency of the upper and lower limbs, balance and i.a. muscle tension. Therefore, it is important to identify and understand the relationships between these basic data in order to make conclusions easier and to set good goals in rehabilitation.\n\nObjective: The aim of the study was to investigate the relation between the assessment of the motor efficiency of the lower limb, measured Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale (FMA) and the balance, measured Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and between the FMA and the assessment of muscle tone, measured modified Ashworth scale in chronic-phase patients after an ischemic stroke before and after a 6-week rehabilitation process.\n\nMaterial and methods: The study group consisted of 37 patients after stroke (post-stroke duration > 1 year). All patients were subjected to a double functional assessment. Main measures: motor function in the lower limb, balance and spasticity in the lower limb. Spearman correlation coefficients was used to identify and analyze the relationship between the FMA and BBS as an assessment of the increased muscle tone.\n\nResults: There was a highly significant p <0.0001 positive correlation between the FMA and BBS tests: first period r = 0.6120, second period r = 0.6604. There was a highly significant (p <0.0001) negative correlation between the assessment of FMA test and the muscle tone: first period r = -0.6814, second period r = -0.6532.\n\nConclusions: People in chronic phase after an ischemic stroke have a high positive correlation between the motor efficiency of the lower limb and balance. This study shows also a high, negative correlation between the motor efficiency of the lower limb, and the muscle tone of this limb. Both before and after rehabilitation process.\n\n","PeriodicalId":35329,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacja Medyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacja Medyczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.8241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The basic functional assessment, on the basis of which rehabilitation programming is carried out in a patient after a stroke, consists in examining the efficiency of the upper and lower limbs, balance and i.a. muscle tension. Therefore, it is important to identify and understand the relationships between these basic data in order to make conclusions easier and to set good goals in rehabilitation. Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the relation between the assessment of the motor efficiency of the lower limb, measured Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale (FMA) and the balance, measured Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and between the FMA and the assessment of muscle tone, measured modified Ashworth scale in chronic-phase patients after an ischemic stroke before and after a 6-week rehabilitation process. Material and methods: The study group consisted of 37 patients after stroke (post-stroke duration > 1 year). All patients were subjected to a double functional assessment. Main measures: motor function in the lower limb, balance and spasticity in the lower limb. Spearman correlation coefficients was used to identify and analyze the relationship between the FMA and BBS as an assessment of the increased muscle tone. Results: There was a highly significant p <0.0001 positive correlation between the FMA and BBS tests: first period r = 0.6120, second period r = 0.6604. There was a highly significant (p <0.0001) negative correlation between the assessment of FMA test and the muscle tone: first period r = -0.6814, second period r = -0.6532. Conclusions: People in chronic phase after an ischemic stroke have a high positive correlation between the motor efficiency of the lower limb and balance. This study shows also a high, negative correlation between the motor efficiency of the lower limb, and the muscle tone of this limb. Both before and after rehabilitation process.
Fugl-Meyer评估量表与Berg平衡量表评估缺血性卒中后慢性期患者肌张力增高的相关性分析
基本功能评估是在中风患者进行康复规划的基础上进行的,包括检查上肢和下肢的效率,平衡和肌肉张力。因此,识别和理解这些基础数据之间的关系,对于更好地得出结论和制定良好的康复目标具有重要意义。目的:探讨慢性期缺血性脑卒中患者在康复治疗6周前后下肢运动效率、测量Fugl-Meyer评估量表(FMA)与平衡、测量Berg平衡量表(BBS)及FMA与肌肉张力、测量改良Ashworth量表的关系。材料与方法:研究对象为37例脑卒中患者(脑卒中后持续时间10 ~ 10年)。所有患者均接受双重功能评估。主要测量:下肢运动功能,下肢平衡和痉挛。Spearman相关系数用于识别和分析FMA和BBS之间的关系,作为肌肉张力增加的评估。结果:FMA与BBS检验呈极显著正相关p <0.0001,第一期r = 0.6120,第二期r = 0.6604。FMA测试与肌张力呈极显著负相关(p <0.0001):第一期r = -0.6814,第二期r = -0.6532。结论:缺血性脑卒中后慢性期患者下肢运动效率与平衡能力呈高度正相关。这项研究还表明,下肢的运动效率与下肢的肌肉张力之间存在高度的负相关。康复过程前后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rehabilitacja Medyczna
Rehabilitacja Medyczna Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信