J. A. Garcia Rodriguez, Edwin Eduardo Millán Rojas
{"title":"New methodological approaches and paradigms in the pedagogy of systems engineering","authors":"J. A. Garcia Rodriguez, Edwin Eduardo Millán Rojas","doi":"10.16925/2357-6014.2022.01.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Introduction: the literature review article is a product of the research \"New Methodological Approaches and Paradigms in the Pedagogy of Systems Engineering\" developed at the University of the Amazonia during the year 2020. \nProblem: the new challenges that systems engineering faces require the development of an integrated approach in the contents that are seen in the academic training processes, besides they imply significant changes in the methodologies and styles of teaching and learning. \nObjective: to analyze the methodological approaches and international paradigms in engineering pedagogy and teaching that have produced better results. \nMethodology: the existing literature on New Methodological Approaches and Paradigms in Systems Engineering Pedagogy was analyzed in a local, national and global context. The databases ScienceDirect, Scielo, Proquest, Web of Science Engineering, Scopus, Dialnet were intensively reviewed. \nResults: A comparison is established between international pedagogical approaches and those that have been developed in Colombia, to identify the key methods and principles that national universities should integrate to promote the development of more creative professionals with greater innovation capacities. \nConclusion: international teaching models choose to generate professionals who have more problem-solving skills, in the midst of a practical approach that allows them to influence and transform reality. \nOriginality: it is based on understanding the new teaching approaches from a particular reading of the current reality and the specific needs of the market in the digital era \nLimitations: the lack of primary sources such as interviews, through which the perceptions of university managers or engineering teachers are consulted.","PeriodicalId":41023,"journal":{"name":"Ingenieria Solidaria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ingenieria Solidaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-6014.2022.01.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Introduction: the literature review article is a product of the research "New Methodological Approaches and Paradigms in the Pedagogy of Systems Engineering" developed at the University of the Amazonia during the year 2020.
Problem: the new challenges that systems engineering faces require the development of an integrated approach in the contents that are seen in the academic training processes, besides they imply significant changes in the methodologies and styles of teaching and learning.
Objective: to analyze the methodological approaches and international paradigms in engineering pedagogy and teaching that have produced better results.
Methodology: the existing literature on New Methodological Approaches and Paradigms in Systems Engineering Pedagogy was analyzed in a local, national and global context. The databases ScienceDirect, Scielo, Proquest, Web of Science Engineering, Scopus, Dialnet were intensively reviewed.
Results: A comparison is established between international pedagogical approaches and those that have been developed in Colombia, to identify the key methods and principles that national universities should integrate to promote the development of more creative professionals with greater innovation capacities.
Conclusion: international teaching models choose to generate professionals who have more problem-solving skills, in the midst of a practical approach that allows them to influence and transform reality.
Originality: it is based on understanding the new teaching approaches from a particular reading of the current reality and the specific needs of the market in the digital era
Limitations: the lack of primary sources such as interviews, through which the perceptions of university managers or engineering teachers are consulted.
引言:引言:这篇文献综述文章是亚马逊大学2020年开发的“系统工程教育学中的新方法论方法和范式”研究的产物。问题:系统工程面临的新挑战需要在学术培训过程中的内容中开发一种综合的方法,此外还意味着教学方法和风格的重大变化。目的:分析在工程教育学和教学中产生较好效果的方法论方法和国际范式。方法论:从地方、国家和全球的角度分析了现有的关于系统工程教育学新方法论方法和范式的文献。对ScienceDirect、Scielo、Proquest、Web of Science Engineering、Scopus、Dialnet等数据库进行了深入的综述。结果:将国际教学方法与哥伦比亚制定的教学方法进行了比较,以确定国立大学应整合的关键方法和原则,以促进培养具有更大创新能力的更有创造力的专业人员。结论:国际教学模式选择培养具有更多解决问题技能的专业人员,同时采用实用的方法,使他们能够影响和改变现实。独创性:它基于对当前现实和数字时代市场具体需求的特殊解读来理解新的教学方法局限性:缺乏采访等主要来源,通过采访可以咨询大学管理人员或工程教师的看法。