Can Structural Differences Between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 Explain Differences in Drug Efficacy?

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Sridivya Raparla, Xiaoling Li, Jay S Srava, Sowmya Jasti, B. Jasti
{"title":"Can Structural Differences Between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 Explain Differences in Drug Efficacy?","authors":"Sridivya Raparla, Xiaoling Li, Jay S Srava, Sowmya Jasti, B. Jasti","doi":"10.5530/ctbp.2021.3.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus (SARS-CoV)and severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), both virus spike proteins are recognized by the cell surface receptors, human angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2).These viruses gain access into the host cell through ACE-2receptors.The main aim of the current study was to elaborate on the structural differences in the receptor binding domain (RBD) of spike glycoprotein in SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 that bind at the same active binding site. The crystal structures of receptor bound spikes of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 were compared using UCSF Chimera and pyMOL software which revealed significant differences in the receptor binding domain of the spikes with variation in the amino acid residues. It was also observed that conformational changes occurred in the amino acid residues at the binding site on ACE-2 receptor. These conformational changes in ACE-2 binding site of SARS-CoV-2 were attributed to a greater number of contacts forming between RBD and active binding site when compared to that of SARS-CoV and could explain any differences in the effectiveness of drugs against SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. In addition, using Autodock vina software, drugs that were found to be effective in SARS-COV treatment were docked at active binding site on ACE-2.Antivirals, ACE-2 inhibitors and corticosteroids were docked at the active binding site domains of ACE-2 receptor in SARS-CoV andSARS-CoV-2.Antivirals such as Oseltamivir, Umifenovir, Favipiravir, Remdesivir and antibiotics such as Moxifloxacin and Azithromycin, Ace-2. Antivirals inhibitors such as Losartan and steroids such as Dexamethasone have shown a greater negative docking score (indicating more binding affinity) in and SARS-CoV-2 when compared to that of SARS-CoV. This kind of preliminary analysis using computational techniques could help in screening and repurposing the existing drugs that are potential in treating new diseases such as CoVID-19.","PeriodicalId":10980,"journal":{"name":"Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/ctbp.2021.3.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus (SARS-CoV)and severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), both virus spike proteins are recognized by the cell surface receptors, human angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2).These viruses gain access into the host cell through ACE-2receptors.The main aim of the current study was to elaborate on the structural differences in the receptor binding domain (RBD) of spike glycoprotein in SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 that bind at the same active binding site. The crystal structures of receptor bound spikes of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 were compared using UCSF Chimera and pyMOL software which revealed significant differences in the receptor binding domain of the spikes with variation in the amino acid residues. It was also observed that conformational changes occurred in the amino acid residues at the binding site on ACE-2 receptor. These conformational changes in ACE-2 binding site of SARS-CoV-2 were attributed to a greater number of contacts forming between RBD and active binding site when compared to that of SARS-CoV and could explain any differences in the effectiveness of drugs against SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. In addition, using Autodock vina software, drugs that were found to be effective in SARS-COV treatment were docked at active binding site on ACE-2.Antivirals, ACE-2 inhibitors and corticosteroids were docked at the active binding site domains of ACE-2 receptor in SARS-CoV andSARS-CoV-2.Antivirals such as Oseltamivir, Umifenovir, Favipiravir, Remdesivir and antibiotics such as Moxifloxacin and Azithromycin, Ace-2. Antivirals inhibitors such as Losartan and steroids such as Dexamethasone have shown a greater negative docking score (indicating more binding affinity) in and SARS-CoV-2 when compared to that of SARS-CoV. This kind of preliminary analysis using computational techniques could help in screening and repurposing the existing drugs that are potential in treating new diseases such as CoVID-19.
SARS-CoV和SARS-CoV-2的结构差异能否解释疗效差异?
严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV)和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)这两种病毒刺突蛋白都被细胞表面受体识别,人类血管紧张素转换酶-2(ACE-2)。这些病毒通过ACE-2受体进入宿主细胞。本研究的主要目的是详细说明在同一活性结合位点结合的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒和严重急性呼吸系统冠状病毒2中刺突糖蛋白受体结合域(RBD)的结构差异。使用UCSF Chimera和pyMOL软件比较了SARS冠状病毒和严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型受体结合尖峰的晶体结构,发现尖峰的受体结合结构域随着氨基酸残基的变化而存在显著差异。还观察到ACE-2受体结合位点的氨基酸残基发生构象变化。与非典型肺炎冠状病毒相比,严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型ACE-2结合位点的这些构象变化归因于RBD和活性结合位点之间形成了更多的接触,这可以解释药物对抗严重急性呼吸系统冠状病毒2型和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒的有效性的任何差异。此外,使用Autodock-vina软件,将被发现对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒治疗有效的药物对接在ACE-2的活性结合位点。抗病毒药物、ACE-2抑制剂和皮质类固醇对接在严重急性呼吸系统冠状病毒和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2中的ACE-2受体的活性结合部位结构域,瑞德西韦和抗生素如莫西沙星和阿奇霉素,Ace-2。与严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒相比,氯沙坦等抗病毒抑制剂和地塞米松等类固醇在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型中显示出更大的负对接得分(表明更高的结合亲和力)。这种使用计算技术的初步分析可能有助于筛选和重新利用现有药物,这些药物有可能治疗新冠肺炎等新疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy
Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy (ABAP) will be useful to form a forum for scientists so that they can bring together to discuss and find scientific solutions to the problems of society. The annual meetings will help the members to share their knowledge and publish their research knowledge particularly by members and fellows of the Association and special care will be taken to provide an opportunity for young scientists. Besides this the association is planned to organize symposia, seminars and workshops on current developments of Biotechnology and Pharmacy particularly on the subject of current scientific interest, and the proceedings of which will be published regularly. And in view of the vast development of science and to disseminate the problems in publication of research work, an international journal of Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy has been started by ABAP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信