Signs of Difference: Language and Ideology in Social Life by Susan Gal and Judith T. Irvine (review)

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
J. Slotta
{"title":"Signs of Difference: Language and Ideology in Social Life by Susan Gal and Judith T. Irvine (review)","authors":"J. Slotta","doi":"10.1353/anq.2023.a900194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T concept of ideology has gone out of fashion in many quarters. Already in 1991, Terry Eagleton remarked on its disappearance from the writings of social theorists. Since then, turns toward affect, materiality, ontology, and the like have moved cultural anthropology and social theory even further from the discursive, representational, subjective domain of ideology. Coincidently, around the time Eagleton was remarking on the abandonment of the concept, ideology was beginning to find its legs in the field of linguistic anthropology. Since then, the study of language ideologies— people’s conceptions of language and its use—has grown to assume a central place in the field. It has not only provided a fruitful angle for approaching longstanding concerns of linguistic anthropologists, everything from the intricacies of conversational interaction to the historical transformations of languages. It has also opened up vast new terrain for research, serving as an intellectual trading zone where linguistic anthropologists draw on and contribute to scholarship on modernity, (post)coloniality, liberal democracy, neoliberal globalization, new media, religion, education, and a host of other topics. During this time, few scholars have had more of an impact on the study of language ideologies than Susan Gal and Judith T. Irvine. Their 2000 essay “Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation” is already a classic in the field. Now, with Signs of Difference: Language and Ideology in Social Life, we have the culmination of their decades-long investigation into the warp and woof of language ideologies. This book will be required reading","PeriodicalId":51536,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Quarterly","volume":"96 1","pages":"379 - 384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2023.a900194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

T concept of ideology has gone out of fashion in many quarters. Already in 1991, Terry Eagleton remarked on its disappearance from the writings of social theorists. Since then, turns toward affect, materiality, ontology, and the like have moved cultural anthropology and social theory even further from the discursive, representational, subjective domain of ideology. Coincidently, around the time Eagleton was remarking on the abandonment of the concept, ideology was beginning to find its legs in the field of linguistic anthropology. Since then, the study of language ideologies— people’s conceptions of language and its use—has grown to assume a central place in the field. It has not only provided a fruitful angle for approaching longstanding concerns of linguistic anthropologists, everything from the intricacies of conversational interaction to the historical transformations of languages. It has also opened up vast new terrain for research, serving as an intellectual trading zone where linguistic anthropologists draw on and contribute to scholarship on modernity, (post)coloniality, liberal democracy, neoliberal globalization, new media, religion, education, and a host of other topics. During this time, few scholars have had more of an impact on the study of language ideologies than Susan Gal and Judith T. Irvine. Their 2000 essay “Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation” is already a classic in the field. Now, with Signs of Difference: Language and Ideology in Social Life, we have the culmination of their decades-long investigation into the warp and woof of language ideologies. This book will be required reading
《差异的标志:社会生活中的语言与意识形态》苏珊·盖尔、朱迪思·t·欧文著
意识形态的概念在很多地方已经过时了。早在1991年,特里·伊格尔顿(Terry Eagleton)就指出,它从社会理论家的著作中消失了。从那时起,对情感、物质性、本体论等的转向使文化人类学和社会理论进一步脱离了意识形态的话语、表征和主观领域。巧合的是,大约在伊格尔顿谈论放弃这个概念的时候,意识形态开始在语言人类学领域找到立足之地。从那时起,对语言意识形态的研究——人们对语言及其使用的概念——已经在该领域占据了中心地位。它不仅为语言人类学家长期关注的问题提供了一个富有成效的角度,从错综复杂的对话互动到语言的历史转变。它也为研究开辟了广阔的新领域,作为一个知识贸易区,语言人类学家在现代性、(后)殖民、自由民主、新自由主义全球化、新媒体、宗教、教育和许多其他主题的学术研究中汲取并作出贡献。在这一时期,很少有学者对语言意识形态的研究有比苏珊·盖尔和朱迪思·t·欧文更大的影响。他们2000年的论文《语言意识形态与语言分化》已经是该领域的经典著作。现在,在《差异的迹象:社会生活中的语言和意识形态》一书中,我们看到了他们对语言意识形态的经纬长达数十年的研究的高潮。这本书将是必读的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Since 1921, Anthropological Quarterly has published scholarly articles, review articles, book reviews, and lists of recently published books in all areas of sociocultural anthropology. Its goal is the rapid dissemination of articles that blend precision with humanism, and scrupulous analysis with meticulous description.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信