Youtube as a source of information about Percutan Tracheostomy

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
MD Erkan Ozduran, V. Hancı, Özlem Öner, E. Özduran, Erol Gökel
{"title":"Youtube as a source of information about Percutan Tracheostomy","authors":"MD Erkan Ozduran, V. Hancı, Özlem Öner, E. Özduran, Erol Gökel","doi":"10.12996/gmj.2023.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Percutaneous tracheostomy one of the most common interventional procedures in the intensive care unit. The aim of our study is to investigate “Youtube ® ” videos about percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care unit in terms of the information value and quality they provide. Material and Method: Video search was performed on the “YouTube.com” in November 2021 with the “percutaneous tracheostomy” search key. The first 100 videos about percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care unit were listed and the number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, uploaded source, source country and continent were determined, and content analyzes were made. The quality, reliability and accuracy of the videos were determined by the \"Global Quality Score\"(GQS), \"Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Quality Test\" and \"Modified DISCERN\" questionnaire, respectively. Results: According to GQS, 45 low, 31 medium and 24 high quality videos were detected. 72 of the videos contained insufficient, 25 partially sufficient and 3 completely sufficient data. Academic and doctor-sourced videos comprised the majority (70,83%) of the high-quality group. There was no significant relationship between video sources, GQS, JAMA score, Modified DISCERN score and the number of views, likes, dislikes and comments(p>0,05). A weak positive correlation was found between video duration and GQS(r=0,206), JAMA(r=0.263), modified DISCERN(r=0,388) scores(p<0,05). Conclusion: According to our results, it was determined that most of the youtube videos about percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care unit were of poor quality and had insufficient data. It has been determined that high-quality videos are of longer duration and are uploaded by academic and doctor sources.","PeriodicalId":42791,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gazi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12996/gmj.2023.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous tracheostomy one of the most common interventional procedures in the intensive care unit. The aim of our study is to investigate “Youtube ® ” videos about percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care unit in terms of the information value and quality they provide. Material and Method: Video search was performed on the “YouTube.com” in November 2021 with the “percutaneous tracheostomy” search key. The first 100 videos about percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care unit were listed and the number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, uploaded source, source country and continent were determined, and content analyzes were made. The quality, reliability and accuracy of the videos were determined by the "Global Quality Score"(GQS), "Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Quality Test" and "Modified DISCERN" questionnaire, respectively. Results: According to GQS, 45 low, 31 medium and 24 high quality videos were detected. 72 of the videos contained insufficient, 25 partially sufficient and 3 completely sufficient data. Academic and doctor-sourced videos comprised the majority (70,83%) of the high-quality group. There was no significant relationship between video sources, GQS, JAMA score, Modified DISCERN score and the number of views, likes, dislikes and comments(p>0,05). A weak positive correlation was found between video duration and GQS(r=0,206), JAMA(r=0.263), modified DISCERN(r=0,388) scores(p<0,05). Conclusion: According to our results, it was determined that most of the youtube videos about percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care unit were of poor quality and had insufficient data. It has been determined that high-quality videos are of longer duration and are uploaded by academic and doctor sources.
Youtube作为Percutan气管切开术的信息来源
引言:经皮气管造口术是重症监护室最常见的介入手术之一。我们研究的目的是调查“Youtube®”关于重症监护室经皮气管造口术的视频提供的信息价值和质量。材料和方法:2021年11月,在“YouTube.com”上使用“经皮气管切开术”搜索键进行视频搜索。列出了前100个关于重症监护室经皮气管切开术的视频,并确定了观看次数、喜欢、不喜欢、评论、上传来源、来源国家和大陆,并进行了内容分析。视频的质量、可靠性和准确性分别通过“全球质量分数”(GQS)、“美国医学会杂志(JAMA)质量测试”和“改进的DISCERN”问卷确定。结果:根据GQS,检测到45个低质量视频、31个中等质量视频和24个高质量视频。其中72个视频包含不足的数据、25个部分足够的数据和3个完全足够的数据。学术和医生来源的视频占高质量群体的大多数(70.83%)。视频来源、GQS、JAMA评分、Modified DISCERN评分与观看次数、喜欢、不喜欢和评论之间没有显著关系(p>0.05)。视频持续时间与GQS(r=0206)、JAMA(r=0.263)、改良DISCERN(r=0388)评分之间存在弱正相关(p<0.05)。结论:根据我们的结果,确定大多数关于重症监护室经皮气管切开术的youtube视频质量较差,数据不足。已经确定,高质量的视频持续时间更长,由学术和医生来源上传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gazi Medical Journal
Gazi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Gazi Medical Journal is being published from 1990 four times annually. Gazi Medical Journal is an international journal presenting research results in all medical fields, with the aim of becoming the premier source of high quality research from Eastern Europe , Middle East and Asia. The Gazi Medical Journal is peer-reviewed and is published quarterly in paper and electronic version. The language of the Gazi Medical Journal is English and Turkish. Offerings include research articles, rapid communications, case reports, letters to the editor, meta-analyses and commentaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信