Editorial endeavours: plainchant revision in early modern Italian printed graduals

IF 0.5 1区 艺术学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Marianne C E Gillion
{"title":"Editorial endeavours: plainchant revision in early modern Italian printed graduals","authors":"Marianne C E Gillion","doi":"10.1017/S0961137120000066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The extensive melodic revision of plainchant in editions of the Graduale Romanum published in Italy from the late sixteenth century onward resulted in musically diverse repertoires that could depart widely from earlier chant traditions. The scale of the changes in these sources, both in type and in number, has obscured certain aspects of their editors’ work: their familiarity with the corpus, their aims and techniques, and their approach to the task. Previous analyses concluded that the editors worked on a chant-by-chant basis, and were either unaware of or ignored any shared melodic relationships between pieces of plainchant. An examination of the revisions to the recurrent melody used by the eight Ostende alleluias in three influential Italian printed graduals – Gardano 1591, Giunta 1596 and Medici 1614/15 – provides a different perspective. Analyses of the reshaped chants reveal that the editors possessed knowledge of the repertoire guiding aims, and favoured revision techniques. The combination of these factors, whether intentionally or not, resulted in the chants’ continued structural connection in the midst of increased melodic diversity. The individuation evident the chants did not necessarily signal the editors’ unfamiliarity with the repertoire, but could have been indicative of their intentional rejection of shared elements. Further, the revisions to the Ostende alleluias reveal that the editorial process could be flexible, with the chants approached both as individual entities and as groups. These findings demonstrate the complexity of the editorial process in early modern Italian printed graduals, and deepen our understanding of this multifaceted repertoire.","PeriodicalId":41539,"journal":{"name":"Plainsong & Medieval Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0961137120000066","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plainsong & Medieval Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0961137120000066","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The extensive melodic revision of plainchant in editions of the Graduale Romanum published in Italy from the late sixteenth century onward resulted in musically diverse repertoires that could depart widely from earlier chant traditions. The scale of the changes in these sources, both in type and in number, has obscured certain aspects of their editors’ work: their familiarity with the corpus, their aims and techniques, and their approach to the task. Previous analyses concluded that the editors worked on a chant-by-chant basis, and were either unaware of or ignored any shared melodic relationships between pieces of plainchant. An examination of the revisions to the recurrent melody used by the eight Ostende alleluias in three influential Italian printed graduals – Gardano 1591, Giunta 1596 and Medici 1614/15 – provides a different perspective. Analyses of the reshaped chants reveal that the editors possessed knowledge of the repertoire guiding aims, and favoured revision techniques. The combination of these factors, whether intentionally or not, resulted in the chants’ continued structural connection in the midst of increased melodic diversity. The individuation evident the chants did not necessarily signal the editors’ unfamiliarity with the repertoire, but could have been indicative of their intentional rejection of shared elements. Further, the revisions to the Ostende alleluias reveal that the editorial process could be flexible, with the chants approached both as individual entities and as groups. These findings demonstrate the complexity of the editorial process in early modern Italian printed graduals, and deepen our understanding of this multifaceted repertoire.
编辑的努力:早期现代意大利印刷渐进式的简明修订
摘要从16世纪末开始,意大利出版的《渐变罗马曲》对普通圣歌进行了大量的旋律修订,从而形成了音乐上多样化的曲目,这些曲目可能与早期的圣歌传统大相径庭。这些来源在类型和数量上的变化掩盖了编辑工作的某些方面:他们对语料库的熟悉程度、目标和技术,以及他们完成任务的方法。先前的分析得出结论,编辑们是在逐个圣歌的基础上工作的,他们要么没有意识到,要么忽略了普通圣歌之间的任何共同旋律关系。对三本有影响力的意大利印刷毕业论文(Gardano 1591、Giunta 1596和Medici 1614/15)中八首Ostende alleluias使用的反复旋律的修订进行了研究,提供了一个不同的视角。通过对改编后的圣歌的分析,可以发现编辑们对曲目的指导目的有一定的了解,并倾向于修改技巧。这些因素的结合,无论是有意还是无意,都导致了圣歌在旋律多样性增加的过程中持续的结构联系。圣歌的个性化并不一定意味着编辑们对曲目不熟悉,但可能表明他们有意拒绝共享元素。此外,对Ostende alleluias的修订表明,编辑过程可以是灵活的,圣歌既可以作为个人实体,也可以作为团体。这些发现表明了现代意大利早期印刷毕业论文编辑过程的复杂性,并加深了我们对这一多方面内容的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Plainsong & Medieval Music is published twice a year in association with the Plainsong and Medieval Music Society and Cantus Planus, study group of the International Musicological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of medieval music: Eastern and Western chant, secular lyric, music theory, palaeography, performance practice, and medieval polyphony, both sacred and secular, as well as the history of musical institutions. The chronological scope of the journal extends from late antiquity to the early Renaissance and to the present day in the case of chant. In addition to book reviews in each issue, a comprehensive bibliography of chant research and a discography of recent and re-issued plainchant recordings appear annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信