The effect of winter fodder beet or kale allocation on behaviour and blood metabolite status of non-lactating dairy cows

Q3 Environmental Science
D. Dalley, J. Edwards, Emma Masterson, R. Woods
{"title":"The effect of winter fodder beet or kale allocation on behaviour and blood metabolite status of non-lactating dairy cows","authors":"D. Dalley, J. Edwards, Emma Masterson, R. Woods","doi":"10.33584/jnzg.2021.83.3497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fodder beet (FB) was at first rapidly adopted by farmers, however, there is uncertainty around the impact of feeding high rates of FB on metabolic diseases and cow behaviour. This study aimed to establish if there was an effect of crop type and feed allocation on blood metabolites and behaviour of dairy cows. \nIn winter 2017, 328 mixed-aged pregnant non-lactating Friesian x Jersey cows were allocated to feeding treatments of either FB or kale, offered at two allocation rates: “target” (to achieve 0.5 BCS gain) or “high” (ad libitum allocation), supplemented with pasture baleage. Blood metabolites were monitored for 20 animals per treatment, 15 of those animals per treatment had an activity sensor fitted for 8 days in late July. \nCows fed FB had higher plasma magnesium and lower sodium, phosphate, total protein and urea levels than cows fed kale. The FB cows spent less time lying (9.4 vs 11.1 h/d), walked more (2113 vs 1737 steps/day), had fewer lying bouts per day (6.1 vs 9.3 bouts/day), but had longer bout duration (102 vs 81 min) than kale cows. These results indicate differences between winter crops in susceptibility to metabolic diseases and grazing activity which require further investigation.","PeriodicalId":36573,"journal":{"name":"Journal of New Zealand Grasslands","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of New Zealand Grasslands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2021.83.3497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Fodder beet (FB) was at first rapidly adopted by farmers, however, there is uncertainty around the impact of feeding high rates of FB on metabolic diseases and cow behaviour. This study aimed to establish if there was an effect of crop type and feed allocation on blood metabolites and behaviour of dairy cows. In winter 2017, 328 mixed-aged pregnant non-lactating Friesian x Jersey cows were allocated to feeding treatments of either FB or kale, offered at two allocation rates: “target” (to achieve 0.5 BCS gain) or “high” (ad libitum allocation), supplemented with pasture baleage. Blood metabolites were monitored for 20 animals per treatment, 15 of those animals per treatment had an activity sensor fitted for 8 days in late July. Cows fed FB had higher plasma magnesium and lower sodium, phosphate, total protein and urea levels than cows fed kale. The FB cows spent less time lying (9.4 vs 11.1 h/d), walked more (2113 vs 1737 steps/day), had fewer lying bouts per day (6.1 vs 9.3 bouts/day), but had longer bout duration (102 vs 81 min) than kale cows. These results indicate differences between winter crops in susceptibility to metabolic diseases and grazing activity which require further investigation.
冬季饲料甜菜或羽衣甘蓝分配对非泌乳奶牛行为和血液代谢状况的影响
饲料甜菜(FB)最初很快被农民采用,然而,喂养高FB率对代谢疾病和奶牛行为的影响尚不确定。本研究旨在确定作物类型和饲料分配是否对奶牛的血液代谢产物和行为产生影响。2017年冬天,328头混合年龄怀孕的非泌乳弗里森x泽西奶牛被分配到FB或羽衣甘蓝的喂养处理中,以两种分配率提供:“目标”(实现0.5 BCS增益)或“高”(随意分配),并补充牧场打捆。每次治疗监测20只动物的血液代谢产物,其中每次治疗的15只动物在7月下旬安装了8天的活性传感器。喂食FB的奶牛比喂食羽衣甘蓝的奶牛血浆镁含量更高,钠、磷酸盐、总蛋白和尿素含量更低。FB奶牛躺着的时间更少(9.4 vs 11.1 h/d),走路的次数更多(2113 vs 1737步/天),每天躺着的次数更少(6.1 vs 9.3次/天)。但与羽衣甘蓝奶牛相比,躺着的时间更长(102 vs 81分钟)。这些结果表明,冬季作物对代谢性疾病的易感性和放牧活动存在差异,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of New Zealand Grasslands
Journal of New Zealand Grasslands Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信