Identifying and prioritizing the factors affecting the knowledge flow in high-tech industries

IF 2.9 Q2 MANAGEMENT
M. Zahedi, Shayan Naghdi Khanachah, Shirin Papoli
{"title":"Identifying and prioritizing the factors affecting the knowledge flow in high-tech industries","authors":"M. Zahedi, Shayan Naghdi Khanachah, Shirin Papoli","doi":"10.1108/jstpm-01-2021-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study paper is to identify and prioritize the factors affecting the knowledge flow in high-tech industries.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of data collection method. This research has been done in a qualitative–quantitative method. In the qualitative part, due to the nature of the data in this study, expert interviews have been used. The sample studied in this research includes 35 managers and expert professors with experience in the field of knowledge management working in universities and high-tech industries who have been selected by the method of snowball. In the quantitative part, the questionnaire tool and DANP multivariate decision-making method have been used.\n\n\nFindings\nIn this study, a multicriteria decision-making technique using a combination of DEMATEL and ANP (DANP) was used to identify and prioritize the factors affecting the knowledge flow in high-tech industries. In this study, the factors affecting the knowledge flow, including 8 main factors and 31 subfactors, were selected. Human resources, organizational structure, organizational culture, knowledge communication, knowledge management tools, knowledge characteristics, laws, policies and regulations and financial resources were effective in improving knowledge flow, respectively.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nBy studying the research, it was found that the study area is limited, and the previous work has remained at the level of documentation and little practical use has been done. In previous research, the discussion of knowledge flow has not been very open, and doing incomplete work causes limited experiences and increases cost and time wastage, and parallel work may also occur. Therefore, to complete the knowledge management circle and fully achieve the research objectives, as well as to make available and transfer the experiences of people working in this field and also to save time and reduce costs, the contents and factors of previous models have been counted. It is designed for high-tech industries, a model for the flow of knowledge.\n","PeriodicalId":45751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-01-2021-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study paper is to identify and prioritize the factors affecting the knowledge flow in high-tech industries. Design/methodology/approach This research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of data collection method. This research has been done in a qualitative–quantitative method. In the qualitative part, due to the nature of the data in this study, expert interviews have been used. The sample studied in this research includes 35 managers and expert professors with experience in the field of knowledge management working in universities and high-tech industries who have been selected by the method of snowball. In the quantitative part, the questionnaire tool and DANP multivariate decision-making method have been used. Findings In this study, a multicriteria decision-making technique using a combination of DEMATEL and ANP (DANP) was used to identify and prioritize the factors affecting the knowledge flow in high-tech industries. In this study, the factors affecting the knowledge flow, including 8 main factors and 31 subfactors, were selected. Human resources, organizational structure, organizational culture, knowledge communication, knowledge management tools, knowledge characteristics, laws, policies and regulations and financial resources were effective in improving knowledge flow, respectively. Originality/value By studying the research, it was found that the study area is limited, and the previous work has remained at the level of documentation and little practical use has been done. In previous research, the discussion of knowledge flow has not been very open, and doing incomplete work causes limited experiences and increases cost and time wastage, and parallel work may also occur. Therefore, to complete the knowledge management circle and fully achieve the research objectives, as well as to make available and transfer the experiences of people working in this field and also to save time and reduce costs, the contents and factors of previous models have been counted. It is designed for high-tech industries, a model for the flow of knowledge.
识别并优先考虑影响高科技产业知识流动的因素
目的本研究的目的是识别影响高科技产业知识流动的因素并确定其优先级。设计/方法论/方法本研究在目的方面进行应用,在数据收集方法方面进行描述性调查。这项研究采用了定性-定量的方法。在定性部分,由于本研究数据的性质,使用了专家访谈。本研究的样本包括35名在大学和高科技行业具有知识管理经验的管理者和专家教授,他们是通过滚雪球的方法选择的。在定量部分,使用了问卷调查工具和DANP多元决策方法。发现在本研究中,使用DEMATEL和ANP(DANP)相结合的多准则决策技术来识别和排序影响高科技产业知识流动的因素。本研究选取了影响知识流动的因素,包括8个主要因素和31个子因素。人力资源、组织结构、组织文化、知识交流、知识管理工具、知识特征、法律、政策法规和财政资源分别有效地改善了知识流动。原创性/价值通过研究这项研究,发现研究领域有限,以前的工作一直停留在文献层面,很少有实际应用。在以往的研究中,对知识流动的讨论并不是很开放,做不完整的工作会导致经验有限,增加成本和时间浪费,还可能出现并行工作。因此,为了完成知识管理圈并完全实现研究目标,为了提供和转移该领域工作人员的经验,为了节省时间和降低成本,已经计算了以前模型的内容和因素。它是为高科技产业设计的,是知识流动的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信