Combination Intervention Mulligan’s Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides and Ultrasounds Better Than Combination Intervention Stretching And Ultrasounds For Increasing Functional Activity Non-Specific Low Back Pain Patient

Yudi Pramana Putra, M. Widnyana, Ni Luh Putu Gita Karunia Saraswati
{"title":"Combination Intervention Mulligan’s Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides and Ultrasounds Better Than Combination Intervention Stretching And Ultrasounds For Increasing Functional Activity Non-Specific Low Back Pain Patient","authors":"Yudi Pramana Putra, M. Widnyana, Ni Luh Putu Gita Karunia Saraswati","doi":"10.24843/spj.2022.v10.i01.p07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract— Non-specific low back pain is one of the complaints that very often encountered with a picture of complaints originating without a clear cause. Non-specific low back pain is often a reason for the limitation of functional activity in patients because of pain symptoms and muscle tightness around the patient's lower back. The aim of this research is to prove that the Mulligan intervention, namely SNAGS as the latest intervention combined with physiotherapy modalities of ultrasounds, is more effective in improving the functional quality of non-specific low back pain patients than the combination of conventional stretching interventions with ultrasounds. The research method used in this study is the design of experimental research methods in the form of a pre-test and post-test two group design. In its implementation, there will be two groups with the number of each sample in each group consisting of 16 samples selected at random with the block permutation technique. Group 1 will receive conventional stretching and ultrasounds, while group 2 will receive mulligan's “sustained natural apophyseal glides” (SNAGS) and ultrasounds. The patient's functional activity was measured by the MODI (Modified Oswestry Disability Index) questionnaire. The study was conducted at a physiotherapy clinic in Denpasar. The results obtained in this study after processing the Paired T-Test test data in each group to determine whether there is a significant difference between pre and post from each combination, obtained with a p value <0.05, this indicates that there is a difference significant. The difference test between groups was carried out showing that there was a significant difference between the treatment group and the control group with the Independent T-Test test, getting a p value of <0.05 which has an interpretation of a significant difference. The conclusion obtained after the test and discussion of this study is that the mulligan intervention, namely SNAGS as the latest intervention combined with physiotherapy modalities of ultrasounds, is more effective in improving the functional quality of patients with non-specific low back pain than the combination of conventional stretching interventions with ultrasounds. \n  \nKeywords: Mulligan's SNAGS, Ultrasound, Conventional Stretching, Non Specific Low Back Pain, Decreased Functional Activity","PeriodicalId":30774,"journal":{"name":"Sport and Fitness Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport and Fitness Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/spj.2022.v10.i01.p07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract— Non-specific low back pain is one of the complaints that very often encountered with a picture of complaints originating without a clear cause. Non-specific low back pain is often a reason for the limitation of functional activity in patients because of pain symptoms and muscle tightness around the patient's lower back. The aim of this research is to prove that the Mulligan intervention, namely SNAGS as the latest intervention combined with physiotherapy modalities of ultrasounds, is more effective in improving the functional quality of non-specific low back pain patients than the combination of conventional stretching interventions with ultrasounds. The research method used in this study is the design of experimental research methods in the form of a pre-test and post-test two group design. In its implementation, there will be two groups with the number of each sample in each group consisting of 16 samples selected at random with the block permutation technique. Group 1 will receive conventional stretching and ultrasounds, while group 2 will receive mulligan's “sustained natural apophyseal glides” (SNAGS) and ultrasounds. The patient's functional activity was measured by the MODI (Modified Oswestry Disability Index) questionnaire. The study was conducted at a physiotherapy clinic in Denpasar. The results obtained in this study after processing the Paired T-Test test data in each group to determine whether there is a significant difference between pre and post from each combination, obtained with a p value <0.05, this indicates that there is a difference significant. The difference test between groups was carried out showing that there was a significant difference between the treatment group and the control group with the Independent T-Test test, getting a p value of <0.05 which has an interpretation of a significant difference. The conclusion obtained after the test and discussion of this study is that the mulligan intervention, namely SNAGS as the latest intervention combined with physiotherapy modalities of ultrasounds, is more effective in improving the functional quality of patients with non-specific low back pain than the combination of conventional stretching interventions with ultrasounds.   Keywords: Mulligan's SNAGS, Ultrasound, Conventional Stretching, Non Specific Low Back Pain, Decreased Functional Activity
联合干预Mulligan持续自然椎体滑动和超声对增加非特异性腰痛患者功能活动的效果优于联合干预拉伸和超声
摘要——非特异性腰痛是一种常见的主诉,其症状来源不明。由于疼痛症状和患者下背部肌肉紧绷,非特异性腰痛通常是患者功能活动受限的原因。本研究的目的是证明Mulligan干预措施,即SNAGS作为最新的干预措施,结合超声波的物理治疗模式,在改善非特异性腰痛患者的功能质量方面比传统的拉伸干预措施和超声波相结合更有效。本研究采用的研究方法是设计实验研究方法,采用测试前和测试后两组设计的形式。在其实现中,将存在两个组,每组中的每个样本的数量由使用块置换技术随机选择的16个样本组成。第1组将接受常规拉伸和超声波检查,而第2组将接受mulligan的“持续的自然中风滑行”(SNAGS)和超声波检查。患者的功能活动通过MODI(改良奥斯韦斯特里残疾指数)问卷进行测量。这项研究是在登巴萨的一家理疗诊所进行的。本研究在处理各组的配对T检验数据以确定每个组合的前后是否存在显著差异后获得的结果,p值<0.05,这表明存在显著差异。组间差异检验显示,独立T检验显示治疗组与对照组之间存在显著差异,p值<0.05,这可以解释为显著差异。经过本研究的测试和讨论,得出的结论是,mulligan干预措施,即SNAGS作为最新的干预措施,结合超声波的物理治疗模式,在改善非特异性腰痛患者的功能质量方面比传统的拉伸干预措施和超声波相结合更有效。关键词:Mulligan氏SNAGS,超声,常规拉伸,非特异性腰痛,功能活动减少
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信