Crowdsourcing as production model that uses collective intelligence, the collaborative culture and the formation of communities

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Luciano Augusto Toledo, Felix Aguero Dias Leon
{"title":"Crowdsourcing as production model that uses collective intelligence, the collaborative culture and the formation of communities","authors":"Luciano Augusto Toledo, Felix Aguero Dias Leon","doi":"10.1108/INMR-06-2018-0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIt has been verified that companies are using crowdsourcing to carry out tasks related with the market, concentrating on three main areas: product development, advertising and promotion and market research. This study aims to carry out qualitative research using the case study method. The analysis unit that will be used will be marketing activities based on crowdsourcing. Finally, the study subjects used to understand the phenomenon are Coca Cola, PepsiCo, Netflix and Amazon.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nFor this study, the decision was made to use the case study method due to its qualitative character. Thus, the analysis unit of the study is composed of the activities of the company investigated related to the activities of the marketing information system. For this study, a unique case study was used. The object companies were Coca Cola, PepsiCo, Netflix and Amazon.\n\n\nFindings\nA significant number of advantages are therefore perceived for companies that adopt mass collaboration practices in the research and development of products. The strategic importance of this concept for companies that launch themselves into these surprising endeavors is ever more clear and consolidated in their planning. It is up to those sectors that are responsible for communication to think of strategies that incorporate the collaborative work of consumers into their actions.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study presents some limitations that give rise to the opportunity to embark on future studies. As it is an exploratory study, there was no validation of causality between variables, which may diminish the empirical value of the findings. In this context, the sample is small and non-probabilistic, which on one hand made applying the interviews in the field study viable, but on the other does not enable the results to be generalized.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe transfer of power to crowds of consumers has led to a reduction in costs. This combination of innovative and cost reduction constitutes value innovation, a basic factor for customer retention, standing apart from the competition and obtaining appreciable results, thus reducing mortality.\n\n\nSocial implications\nA collaborative action is an integrated marketing and communication action. In the same way, using bloggers to evaluate products today is a basic form of research and development, networking and communication with consumers, who become co-creators of products and services, as well as interlocutors with those responsible for corporate communication.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nA significant number of advantages are therefore perceived for companies that adopt mass collaboration practices in the research and development of products. The strategic importance of this concept for companies that launch themselves into these surprising endeavors is even more clear and consolidated in their planning. It is up to those sectors that are responsible for communication to think of strategies that incorporate the collaborative work of consumers into their actions.\n","PeriodicalId":42220,"journal":{"name":"Innovation & Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/INMR-06-2018-0040","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-06-2018-0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose It has been verified that companies are using crowdsourcing to carry out tasks related with the market, concentrating on three main areas: product development, advertising and promotion and market research. This study aims to carry out qualitative research using the case study method. The analysis unit that will be used will be marketing activities based on crowdsourcing. Finally, the study subjects used to understand the phenomenon are Coca Cola, PepsiCo, Netflix and Amazon. Design/methodology/approach For this study, the decision was made to use the case study method due to its qualitative character. Thus, the analysis unit of the study is composed of the activities of the company investigated related to the activities of the marketing information system. For this study, a unique case study was used. The object companies were Coca Cola, PepsiCo, Netflix and Amazon. Findings A significant number of advantages are therefore perceived for companies that adopt mass collaboration practices in the research and development of products. The strategic importance of this concept for companies that launch themselves into these surprising endeavors is ever more clear and consolidated in their planning. It is up to those sectors that are responsible for communication to think of strategies that incorporate the collaborative work of consumers into their actions. Research limitations/implications The study presents some limitations that give rise to the opportunity to embark on future studies. As it is an exploratory study, there was no validation of causality between variables, which may diminish the empirical value of the findings. In this context, the sample is small and non-probabilistic, which on one hand made applying the interviews in the field study viable, but on the other does not enable the results to be generalized. Practical implications The transfer of power to crowds of consumers has led to a reduction in costs. This combination of innovative and cost reduction constitutes value innovation, a basic factor for customer retention, standing apart from the competition and obtaining appreciable results, thus reducing mortality. Social implications A collaborative action is an integrated marketing and communication action. In the same way, using bloggers to evaluate products today is a basic form of research and development, networking and communication with consumers, who become co-creators of products and services, as well as interlocutors with those responsible for corporate communication. Originality/value A significant number of advantages are therefore perceived for companies that adopt mass collaboration practices in the research and development of products. The strategic importance of this concept for companies that launch themselves into these surprising endeavors is even more clear and consolidated in their planning. It is up to those sectors that are responsible for communication to think of strategies that incorporate the collaborative work of consumers into their actions.
众包是一种利用集体智慧、协作文化和社区形成的生产模式
经过验证,公司正在使用众包来执行与市场相关的任务,主要集中在三个方面:产品开发,广告和促销以及市场研究。本研究旨在采用个案研究法进行定性研究。将使用的分析单元将是基于众包的营销活动。最后,用来理解这一现象的研究对象是可口可乐、百事可乐、Netflix和亚马逊。设计/方法/方法在本研究中,由于其定性特征,决定使用案例研究方法。因此,本研究的分析单元是由被调查公司与营销信息系统活动相关的活动组成的。本研究采用了一个独特的案例研究。目标公司是可口可乐、百事可乐、网飞和亚马逊。因此,对于在产品研究和开发中采用大规模协作实践的公司来说,可以看到大量的优势。对于那些投身于这些令人惊讶的努力的公司来说,这一概念的战略重要性在他们的计划中更加清晰和巩固。负责沟通的部门应该考虑将消费者的协作工作纳入其行动的策略。研究的局限性/意义本研究提出了一些局限性,为今后的研究提供了机会。由于这是一项探索性研究,没有验证变量之间的因果关系,这可能会降低研究结果的经验价值。在这种情况下,样本是小的和非概率的,这一方面使得在实地研究中应用访谈是可行的,但另一方面却不能使结果普遍化。实际意义权力向消费者群体的转移导致了成本的降低。这种创新和降低成本的结合构成了价值创新,这是保持客户的基本因素,在竞争中脱颖而出,获得可观的结果,从而降低死亡率。协同行动是一种整合的营销和传播行动。同样地,今天使用博客来评估产品是一种基本的研发、网络和与消费者沟通的形式,消费者成为产品和服务的共同创造者,也成为负责企业沟通的人的对话者。独创性/价值因此,在产品研发中采用大规模协作实践的公司可以获得大量优势。对于那些投身于这些令人惊讶的努力的公司来说,这一概念的战略重要性在他们的计划中更加明确和巩固。负责沟通的部门应该考虑将消费者的协作工作纳入其行动的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信