Tool assisted task on touchscreen: a case study on drawing behaviour in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

IF 1.2 4区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY
Lison Martinet, C. Sueur, T. Matsuzawa, S. Hirata, N. Morimura, M. Pele
{"title":"Tool assisted task on touchscreen: a case study on drawing behaviour in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)","authors":"Lison Martinet, C. Sueur, T. Matsuzawa, S. Hirata, N. Morimura, M. Pele","doi":"10.1163/14219980-bja10008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nObservations of drawing behaviour in chimpanzees have often focused on the completed drawings. Here, we compared drawing behaviour using fingers or tools on a touch-sensitive monitor between five chimpanzees from the Kumamoto Sanctuary (KS) and two from the Primate Research Institute (PRI), both located at Kyoto University, Japan. Regarding drawing duration, both PRI females drew relatively longer than the other, with the exception of one KS female. However, a long drawing duration did not correspond with a decrease in the number of pauses, which can be interpreted as a lack of concentration or interest. Therefore, to better understand the engagement of individuals, we recorded the time spent looking at the touchscreen. Pan, one of the two PRI females, had the longest drawing periods and spent the most time looking at the screen. We compared her with Ai, the other PRI female, to better understand their individual marking techniques and behaviours. By adapting to each one’s specific behaviour and previous experience with tool-assisted drawing on paper, we offered the females appropriate tools for making marks on the touchscreen. Our results indicate that electronic devices are not limiting in the expression of drawing behaviour. The females did not have the same drawing technique and also showed different types of engagement as motivation, which could not have been detected by only studying the completed drawings. By focusing more on the process rather than on the drawings themselves, we try to show inter-individual differences in drawing behaviour of chimpanzees and the relevance to adapt to it as experimenters.","PeriodicalId":50437,"journal":{"name":"Folia Primatologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Primatologica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/14219980-bja10008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Observations of drawing behaviour in chimpanzees have often focused on the completed drawings. Here, we compared drawing behaviour using fingers or tools on a touch-sensitive monitor between five chimpanzees from the Kumamoto Sanctuary (KS) and two from the Primate Research Institute (PRI), both located at Kyoto University, Japan. Regarding drawing duration, both PRI females drew relatively longer than the other, with the exception of one KS female. However, a long drawing duration did not correspond with a decrease in the number of pauses, which can be interpreted as a lack of concentration or interest. Therefore, to better understand the engagement of individuals, we recorded the time spent looking at the touchscreen. Pan, one of the two PRI females, had the longest drawing periods and spent the most time looking at the screen. We compared her with Ai, the other PRI female, to better understand their individual marking techniques and behaviours. By adapting to each one’s specific behaviour and previous experience with tool-assisted drawing on paper, we offered the females appropriate tools for making marks on the touchscreen. Our results indicate that electronic devices are not limiting in the expression of drawing behaviour. The females did not have the same drawing technique and also showed different types of engagement as motivation, which could not have been detected by only studying the completed drawings. By focusing more on the process rather than on the drawings themselves, we try to show inter-individual differences in drawing behaviour of chimpanzees and the relevance to adapt to it as experimenters.
触屏上的工具辅助任务:黑猩猩绘画行为的案例研究(类人猿)
对黑猩猩绘画行为的观察通常集中在已完成的绘画上。在这里,我们比较了来自熊本保护区(KS)的五只黑猩猩和来自日本京都大学灵长类动物研究所(PRI)的两只黑猩猩在触摸感应监视器上使用手指或工具的绘画行为。在绘制时间方面,除了一位KS女性外,两位PRI女性的绘制时间都相对较长。然而,长时间的绘画并不对应于停顿次数的减少,这可以解释为缺乏注意力或兴趣。因此,为了更好地了解用户的参与度,我们记录了他们看触屏的时间。潘是两只PRI雌性中的一只,画画的时间最长,花在看屏幕上的时间最多。我们将她与另一只PRI雌性Ai进行了比较,以更好地了解它们的个体标记技术和行为。通过适应每个人的特定行为和以前在纸上工具辅助绘画的经验,我们为女性提供了在触摸屏上做标记的合适工具。我们的研究结果表明,电子设备在绘图行为的表达上没有限制。女性没有相同的绘画技巧,也表现出不同类型的参与作为动机,这不能通过只研究完成的绘画来检测。通过更多地关注过程而不是绘画本身,我们试图展示黑猩猩绘画行为的个体间差异,以及作为实验者适应这种差异的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia Primatologica
Folia Primatologica 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Recognizing that research in human biology must be founded on a comparative knowledge of our closest relatives, this journal is the natural scientist''s ideal means of access to the best of current primate research. ''Folia Primatologica'' covers fields as diverse as molecular biology and social behaviour, and features articles on ecology, conservation, palaeontology, systematics and functional anatomy. In-depth articles and invited reviews are contributed by the world’s leading primatologists. In addition, special issues provide rapid peer-reviewed publication of conference proceedings. ''Folia Primatologica'' is one of the top-rated primatology publications and is acknowledged worldwide as a high-impact core journal for primatologists, zoologists and anthropologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信