Prompted Self-Explanations Improve Learning in Statistics but Not Retention

Pub Date : 2022-07-13 DOI:10.1177/00986283221114196
Robert S. Ryan, James A. Koppenhofer
{"title":"Prompted Self-Explanations Improve Learning in Statistics but Not Retention","authors":"Robert S. Ryan, James A. Koppenhofer","doi":"10.1177/00986283221114196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"College students often do not retain what they learn in Statistics in order to apply it in Experimental Psychology. Self-explanation, that is, elaborating on what one is trying to learn by asking questions, making inferences, etc., improves learning and may improve retention. The purpose of this study was to determine whether self-explanation was superior to students’ usual study methods specifically for learning some basic concepts in statistics, and, if so, if it was similarly useful for retention a semester after the initial learning. We used 199 college students as participants in a randomized, between participant, two-part experiment examining the effects of training by prompting self-explanations as a potential solution to this applied problem. The self-explanations that we elicited improved initial learning and were superior to students’ usual study methods, but did not benefit retention. Future research on improving the quality of the self-explanations and training with spaced retrieval practice, in order to benefit retention, is suggested. Self-explanation should be implemented for teaching statistics in order to benefit initial learning. However, teachers should explore other methods to accomplish retention.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283221114196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

College students often do not retain what they learn in Statistics in order to apply it in Experimental Psychology. Self-explanation, that is, elaborating on what one is trying to learn by asking questions, making inferences, etc., improves learning and may improve retention. The purpose of this study was to determine whether self-explanation was superior to students’ usual study methods specifically for learning some basic concepts in statistics, and, if so, if it was similarly useful for retention a semester after the initial learning. We used 199 college students as participants in a randomized, between participant, two-part experiment examining the effects of training by prompting self-explanations as a potential solution to this applied problem. The self-explanations that we elicited improved initial learning and were superior to students’ usual study methods, but did not benefit retention. Future research on improving the quality of the self-explanations and training with spaced retrieval practice, in order to benefit retention, is suggested. Self-explanation should be implemented for teaching statistics in order to benefit initial learning. However, teachers should explore other methods to accomplish retention.
分享
查看原文
促进自我解释提高了统计学的学习,但不是记忆
大学生往往不把他们在统计学中学到的知识应用到实验心理学中。自我解释,即通过提问、推理等方式详细说明自己想学的东西,可以提高学习效果,并可能提高记忆力。本研究的目的是确定自我解释是否优于学生通常的学习方法,特别是在学习统计中的一些基本概念时,如果是这样,那么在最初学习后的一个学期中,自我解释是否同样有用。我们用199名大学生作为参与者,进行了一项随机的、参与者之间的两部分实验,以检验通过促使自我解释作为这个应用问题的潜在解决方案的训练的效果。我们引出的自我解释改善了学生的初始学习,优于学生通常的学习方法,但不利于记忆。建议今后进一步研究如何利用间隔检索练习提高自我解释和训练的质量,以促进记忆。在统计学教学中,应实行自我解释,以有利于学生的初始学习。然而,教师应该探索其他方法来完成记忆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信