Test and Re-Test Reliability of the Special Judo Fitness Test

M. Štefanovský, M. Poliak, Dušana Augustovičová, Stanislav Kraček, Radovan Hadža
{"title":"Test and Re-Test Reliability of the Special Judo Fitness Test","authors":"M. Štefanovský, M. Poliak, Dušana Augustovičová, Stanislav Kraček, Radovan Hadža","doi":"10.2478/afepuc-2021-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Background. When analyzing the available literature, we found differences and considerable variability in the Special Judo Fitness Test (SJFT) reliability methods. Problems and Aim. For this reason, we have set our goal to determine the reliability and measurement error of all parameters by SJFT. Methods. The research sample consisted of 15 judo athletes (17.13 ± 1.96 years, body height 174.4 ± 10.64 cm, body weight 72 ± 15.37 kg) who trained in judo on average 8.73 ± 2.12 years in two different Slovak judo clubs. The results were processed using interclass correlation analysis and measurement error percentage. Results. Our results indicate poor reliability for HR0 (α= 0.374, Err = 4.2 %) and moderate reliability for the following parameters: the number of throws in section A (α = 0.641, Err = 5.9 %), section B (α = 0.512, Err = 6.0 %), and section C (α = 0.644, Err = 5.9 %), respectively. Moderate reliability was also found for the total number of throws (α = 0.687, Err = 5.1 %). Good reliability was found for HR1 (α = 0797, Err = 3.5 %) and SJFT index (α = 0.807, Err = 4.5 %). Conclusions. According to the results of this study, by testing the special level of judo fitness, as well as its changes, we recommend using the HR1 and SJFT index as good reliable parameters.","PeriodicalId":31087,"journal":{"name":"Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae","volume":"61 1","pages":"97 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/afepuc-2021-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Summary Background. When analyzing the available literature, we found differences and considerable variability in the Special Judo Fitness Test (SJFT) reliability methods. Problems and Aim. For this reason, we have set our goal to determine the reliability and measurement error of all parameters by SJFT. Methods. The research sample consisted of 15 judo athletes (17.13 ± 1.96 years, body height 174.4 ± 10.64 cm, body weight 72 ± 15.37 kg) who trained in judo on average 8.73 ± 2.12 years in two different Slovak judo clubs. The results were processed using interclass correlation analysis and measurement error percentage. Results. Our results indicate poor reliability for HR0 (α= 0.374, Err = 4.2 %) and moderate reliability for the following parameters: the number of throws in section A (α = 0.641, Err = 5.9 %), section B (α = 0.512, Err = 6.0 %), and section C (α = 0.644, Err = 5.9 %), respectively. Moderate reliability was also found for the total number of throws (α = 0.687, Err = 5.1 %). Good reliability was found for HR1 (α = 0797, Err = 3.5 %) and SJFT index (α = 0.807, Err = 4.5 %). Conclusions. According to the results of this study, by testing the special level of judo fitness, as well as its changes, we recommend using the HR1 and SJFT index as good reliable parameters.
专项柔道体能测试的测试与复试可靠性
摘要背景。在分析现有文献时,我们发现特殊柔道体能测试(SJFT)可靠性方法存在差异和相当大的可变性。问题和目标。因此,我们设定了通过SJFT确定所有参数的可靠性和测量误差的目标。方法。研究样本包括15名柔道运动员(17.13±1.96岁,身高174.4±10.64厘米,体重72±15.37公斤),他们在斯洛伐克两个不同的柔道俱乐部平均训练了8.73±2.12年。使用类间相关性分析和测量误差百分比对结果进行处理。后果我们的结果表明,HR0的可靠性较差(α=0.374,Err=4.2%),以下参数的可靠性中等:A段(α=0.641,Err=5.9%)、B段(α0.512,Err=6.0%)和C段(α0.644,Err=5.9%)的投掷次数。投掷总数的可靠性也中等(α=0.687,Err=5.1%)。HR1(α=0.0797,Err=3.5%)和SJFT指数(α=0.807,Err=4.5%)具有良好的可靠性。结论。根据本研究的结果,通过测试柔道体能的特殊水平及其变化,我们建议使用HR1和SJFT指数作为良好的可靠参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书