Neural model to estimate permeability from well logs and core data

IF 0.5 Q4 GEOLOGY
Silvia Raquel García-Benítez, Omar Alejandro Arana-Hernández
{"title":"Neural model to estimate permeability from well logs and core data","authors":"Silvia Raquel García-Benítez, Omar Alejandro Arana-Hernández","doi":"10.18273/revbol.v45n1-2023007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A case study testing the effectiveness of neural networks for permeability determination in heterogeneous media using basic rock properties is presented. The dataset used consists of 213 core samples from the Morrow and Viola formations in Kansas, United States. The characterizing parameters of the cores are porosity (ϕ), water and oil saturations (Sw and So), and grain density (GD), and the additional variables from well logs are induction resistivity (ILD), gamma ray (GR) and neutron-porosity (NPHI). The neural predictions are compared with permeability values obtained from three semi-empirical models (Timur, Coates, and Pape) widely used in reservoir characterization. It is concluded that the neural network provides the best overall prediction quantified by the highest correlation coefficients (R and R2) far above those achieved with conventional methods in formations with rock heterogeneity and complex diagenetic nature. Applying Timur’s method R was 0.58 and R2 was 0.343, for Coates’ model R was 0.60 and R2 0.365 and for Pape’s model R was 0.60 and R2 was 0.372, while for the neural model, 0.97 and 0.94 were obtained for R and R2, respectively.","PeriodicalId":44188,"journal":{"name":"Boletin de Geologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletin de Geologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18273/revbol.v45n1-2023007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A case study testing the effectiveness of neural networks for permeability determination in heterogeneous media using basic rock properties is presented. The dataset used consists of 213 core samples from the Morrow and Viola formations in Kansas, United States. The characterizing parameters of the cores are porosity (ϕ), water and oil saturations (Sw and So), and grain density (GD), and the additional variables from well logs are induction resistivity (ILD), gamma ray (GR) and neutron-porosity (NPHI). The neural predictions are compared with permeability values obtained from three semi-empirical models (Timur, Coates, and Pape) widely used in reservoir characterization. It is concluded that the neural network provides the best overall prediction quantified by the highest correlation coefficients (R and R2) far above those achieved with conventional methods in formations with rock heterogeneity and complex diagenetic nature. Applying Timur’s method R was 0.58 and R2 was 0.343, for Coates’ model R was 0.60 and R2 0.365 and for Pape’s model R was 0.60 and R2 was 0.372, while for the neural model, 0.97 and 0.94 were obtained for R and R2, respectively.
根据测井和岩心数据估计渗透率的神经模型
介绍了一个利用岩石基本特性测试神经网络在非均质介质中渗透率的有效性的案例研究。所使用的数据集由213个来自美国堪萨斯州Morrow和Viola地层的岩心样本组成。岩心的特征参数是孔隙度(ξ)、水和油饱和度(Sw和So)以及颗粒密度(GD),测井的其他变量是感应电阻率(ILD)、伽马射线(GR)和中子孔隙度(NPHI)。将神经预测与从储层表征中广泛使用的三个半经验模型(Timur、Coates和Pape)获得的渗透率值进行比较。得出的结论是,在具有岩石非均质性和复杂成岩性质的地层中,神经网络提供了由最高相关系数(R和R2)量化的最佳总体预测,远高于传统方法。应用Timur的方法,R为0.58,R2为0.343,对于Coates的模型,R为0.60,R2为0.365,对于Pape的模型,R=0.60,R2为0.372,而对于神经模型,R和R2分别获得0.97和0.94。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信