Why Do Physicians Volunteer at Student-Run Free Clinics? A Look into What Drives or Hinders Their Participation

Susan Greni, Stephanie Radil, Benjamin McIntire, M. Menning
{"title":"Why Do Physicians Volunteer at Student-Run Free Clinics? A Look into What Drives or Hinders Their Participation","authors":"Susan Greni, Stephanie Radil, Benjamin McIntire, M. Menning","doi":"10.59586/jsrc.v8i1.312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) provide students space to join and lead the care of patients who may not have access to care elsewhere. This is done under supervision of a physician preceptor who ensures safety and quality care while fostering a learning environment for students. The SRFC cannot function without physician preceptors. Concerns about retention and participation at the Student Health Alliance Reaching Indigent Needy Groups (SHARING) Clinic, a SRFC at University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), fueled the investigation into motivations and barriers of physician volunteerism. This study aims to find why physicians volunteer and to propose meaningful strategies to increase retention rates at our institution and other SRFCs. \nMethods: An anonymous electronic survey was emailed to 348 physicians from various departments at UNMC. The survey assessed frequency of volunteerism, motivations and barriers, preceptor experiences, demographic information, and free form questions with respect to volunteering at the university associated SRFC.  \nResults: Of the 348 survey recipients, 49 (13.5%) physicians responded. The most common barriers to physician volunteerism are work (n=23, 59%) and family obligations (n=23, 59%). The most common motivations are the ability to mentor students (n=14, 36%) and help patients in need (n=12, 31%). Of the respondents, 25 (61%) had never previously volunteered at SHARING. Of those who had volunteered, 7 (44%) reported volunteering at SHARING Clinic on average once or less per year over multiple years. Additionally, 13 (81%) volunteers report that they agree or strongly agree that they were satisfied with the experience and that it helped them improve their mentoring relationships with students. \nConclusions: Collectively, the results indicate that the physicians sampled feel it is valuable to volunteer at the SRFC but are often impeded by other obligations. SRFCs may implement our proposed strategies to enhance motivations and mitigate barriers to physician volunteering.","PeriodicalId":73958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of student-run clinics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of student-run clinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v8i1.312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) provide students space to join and lead the care of patients who may not have access to care elsewhere. This is done under supervision of a physician preceptor who ensures safety and quality care while fostering a learning environment for students. The SRFC cannot function without physician preceptors. Concerns about retention and participation at the Student Health Alliance Reaching Indigent Needy Groups (SHARING) Clinic, a SRFC at University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), fueled the investigation into motivations and barriers of physician volunteerism. This study aims to find why physicians volunteer and to propose meaningful strategies to increase retention rates at our institution and other SRFCs. Methods: An anonymous electronic survey was emailed to 348 physicians from various departments at UNMC. The survey assessed frequency of volunteerism, motivations and barriers, preceptor experiences, demographic information, and free form questions with respect to volunteering at the university associated SRFC.  Results: Of the 348 survey recipients, 49 (13.5%) physicians responded. The most common barriers to physician volunteerism are work (n=23, 59%) and family obligations (n=23, 59%). The most common motivations are the ability to mentor students (n=14, 36%) and help patients in need (n=12, 31%). Of the respondents, 25 (61%) had never previously volunteered at SHARING. Of those who had volunteered, 7 (44%) reported volunteering at SHARING Clinic on average once or less per year over multiple years. Additionally, 13 (81%) volunteers report that they agree or strongly agree that they were satisfied with the experience and that it helped them improve their mentoring relationships with students. Conclusions: Collectively, the results indicate that the physicians sampled feel it is valuable to volunteer at the SRFC but are often impeded by other obligations. SRFCs may implement our proposed strategies to enhance motivations and mitigate barriers to physician volunteering.
为什么医生在学生开办的免费诊所做志愿者?调查是什么驱使或阻碍了他们的参与
背景:学生开办的免费诊所(SRFCs)为学生提供了参与和领导病人护理的空间,这些病人可能无法在其他地方获得护理。这是在医生导师的监督下完成的,他确保安全和高质量的护理,同时为学生营造一个学习环境。没有医生的指导,SRFC无法正常运作。内布拉斯加大学医学中心(UNMC)的学生健康联盟援助贫困群体诊所(SHARING)对保留和参与的关注,推动了对医生志愿服务动机和障碍的调查。本研究旨在找出医生志愿服务的原因,并提出有意义的策略来提高我们机构和其他srfc的保留率。方法:通过电子邮件对来自UNMC各科室的348名医生进行匿名电子调查。该调查评估了志愿服务的频率、动机和障碍、导师经验、人口统计信息以及与大学相关的SRFC志愿服务有关的自由形式问题。结果:在348名接受调查的医生中,有49名(13.5%)医生回复。医生志愿服务最常见的障碍是工作(n= 23.59%)和家庭义务(n= 23.59%)。最常见的动机是能够指导学生(n=14, 36%)和帮助有需要的患者(n=12, 31%)。在受访者中,有25人(61%)以前从未在SHARING做过志愿者。在那些做过志愿者的人中,7人(44%)报告说,在多年的时间里,他们平均每年在SHARING诊所做一次或更少的志愿者。此外,13名(81%)志愿者报告说,他们同意或非常同意他们对这一经历感到满意,并认为这有助于他们改善与学生的指导关系。结论:总的来说,结果表明,抽样的医生认为在SRFC做志愿者是有价值的,但往往受到其他义务的阻碍。srfc可以实施我们提出的策略来增强医生志愿服务的动机和减少障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信