Does the benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation differ between phenotypes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

IF 0.1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
M. Buyukşirin, G. Polat, H. Sahin, A. Ayrancı, G. Karadeniz, F. Güldaval, S. Susam, F. Üçsular, C. Anar, Onur Süneçlı
{"title":"Does the benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation differ between phenotypes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?","authors":"M. Buyukşirin, G. Polat, H. Sahin, A. Ayrancı, G. Karadeniz, F. Güldaval, S. Susam, F. Üçsular, C. Anar, Onur Süneçlı","doi":"10.4103/ejop.ejop_26_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disease caused by airway and/or parenchymal pathology. Therefore, some patients inevitably have chronic bronchitis and some patients have emphysema. The current thinking is that exercise affects these two major phenotypes differently. In this study, we investigated the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in chronic bronchitis- and emphysema-predominant COPD patients. METHODS: Retrospective data of chronic bronchitis- and emphysema-predominant COPD patients who completed an outpatient 8-week PR program between the years 2013 and 2017 in the PR unit of our hospital were examined. Demographic data (age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, long-term oxygen therapy, noninvasive ventilation, emergency admissions, and number of hospitalizations) were recorded. The patients were divided into two groups: chronic bronchitis predominant and emphysema predominant. Patients were assigned to the emphysema-predominant group based on radiology results. Patients were assigned to the chronic bronchitis-predominant group according to clinical description. The two groups were compared using the recorded data cited above. RESULTS: Of the 146 patients, 85 (58.2%) were assigned to the emphysema-predominant group and 61 (41.8%) were assigned to the chronic bronchitis-predominant group. There was no difference between the two groups in age and gender. Pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 s and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO)), arterial blood gas values (pO2, PCO2, and SpO2), 6 min of walking time, and quality of life scores were significantly improved after PR. However, there was no difference between the emphysema- and chronic bronchitis-predominant groups in terms of the improvements after PR. CONCLUSION: In this study, it was observed that the improvement due to PR seen in COPD patients was independent of phenotype. Therefore, all COPD patients should be encouraged to participate in PR programs regardless of their phenotypes.","PeriodicalId":42933,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology","volume":"23 1","pages":"32 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejop.ejop_26_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disease caused by airway and/or parenchymal pathology. Therefore, some patients inevitably have chronic bronchitis and some patients have emphysema. The current thinking is that exercise affects these two major phenotypes differently. In this study, we investigated the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in chronic bronchitis- and emphysema-predominant COPD patients. METHODS: Retrospective data of chronic bronchitis- and emphysema-predominant COPD patients who completed an outpatient 8-week PR program between the years 2013 and 2017 in the PR unit of our hospital were examined. Demographic data (age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, long-term oxygen therapy, noninvasive ventilation, emergency admissions, and number of hospitalizations) were recorded. The patients were divided into two groups: chronic bronchitis predominant and emphysema predominant. Patients were assigned to the emphysema-predominant group based on radiology results. Patients were assigned to the chronic bronchitis-predominant group according to clinical description. The two groups were compared using the recorded data cited above. RESULTS: Of the 146 patients, 85 (58.2%) were assigned to the emphysema-predominant group and 61 (41.8%) were assigned to the chronic bronchitis-predominant group. There was no difference between the two groups in age and gender. Pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 s and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO)), arterial blood gas values (pO2, PCO2, and SpO2), 6 min of walking time, and quality of life scores were significantly improved after PR. However, there was no difference between the emphysema- and chronic bronchitis-predominant groups in terms of the improvements after PR. CONCLUSION: In this study, it was observed that the improvement due to PR seen in COPD patients was independent of phenotype. Therefore, all COPD patients should be encouraged to participate in PR programs regardless of their phenotypes.
慢性阻塞性肺病的不同表型对肺部康复的益处是否不同?
简介:慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)是一种由气道和/或实质病理引起的疾病。因此,一些患者不可避免地患有慢性支气管炎,一些患者患有肺气肿。目前的想法是,运动对这两种主要表型的影响不同。在这项研究中,我们调查了肺康复(PR)对慢性支气管炎和肺气肿为主的COPD患者的益处。方法:回顾性分析2013年至2017年在我院PR室完成门诊8周PR项目的慢性支气管炎和肺气肿为主的COPD患者的数据。记录人口统计学数据(年龄、性别、体重指数、吸烟史、长期氧疗、无创通气、急诊入院和住院人数)。将患者分为两组:以慢性支气管炎为主和以肺气肿为主。根据放射学结果,将患者分为肺气肿为主组。根据临床描述将患者分为慢性支气管炎优势组。使用上述记录数据对两组进行比较。结果:146例患者中,85例(58.2%)属于肺气肿为主组,61例(41.8%)属于慢性支气管炎为主组。两组在年龄和性别上没有差异。肺功能测试(PFT)参数(1秒内用力呼气量和肺部一氧化碳扩散能力(DLCO))、动脉血气值(pO2、PCO2和SpO2)、6分钟步行时间和生活质量评分在PR后显著改善。然而,以肺气肿和慢性支气管炎为主的组在PR后的改善方面没有差异。结论:在本研究中,观察到COPD患者因PR而出现的改善与表型无关。因此,应鼓励所有COPD患者参与PR项目,无论其表型如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology
Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信