Animals in the Writing of Bharati Mukherjee

IF 0.4 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
R. Maxey
{"title":"Animals in the Writing of Bharati Mukherjee","authors":"R. Maxey","doi":"10.1353/ari.2023.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:James Kim argues that \"despite long noting the links between animalisation and racialisation, critical animal studies have yet to consider their relationship to Asian American studies\" (136). Relating to this wider scholarly gap, studies of the South Asian American writer Bharati Mukherjee (1940–2017) have yet to examine the importance of fauna within her œuvre. Tracing specific animal metaphors—from avian to marine mammalian and reptilian to canine—this essay confronts that critical silence via close textual analysis and the use of critical animal studies as a theoretical lens. It compares Mukherjee's recurrent, often intertextual and interreferential use of such tropes and interrogates the cultural and gendered associations of animals evoked by her fiction and essays. Writing Indian animal imagery into American literature, Mukherjee's neglected creaturely motifs signify the power of dreams, the fall of the Mughal Empire in India, human communities as endangered species, and predator versus prey dynamics within a Darwinian logic of survival. A shorthand for both India and the United States, animal metaphors expose a brutal world of danger, inequality, and corruption.","PeriodicalId":51893,"journal":{"name":"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE","volume":"54 1","pages":"55 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ari.2023.0002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:James Kim argues that "despite long noting the links between animalisation and racialisation, critical animal studies have yet to consider their relationship to Asian American studies" (136). Relating to this wider scholarly gap, studies of the South Asian American writer Bharati Mukherjee (1940–2017) have yet to examine the importance of fauna within her œuvre. Tracing specific animal metaphors—from avian to marine mammalian and reptilian to canine—this essay confronts that critical silence via close textual analysis and the use of critical animal studies as a theoretical lens. It compares Mukherjee's recurrent, often intertextual and interreferential use of such tropes and interrogates the cultural and gendered associations of animals evoked by her fiction and essays. Writing Indian animal imagery into American literature, Mukherjee's neglected creaturely motifs signify the power of dreams, the fall of the Mughal Empire in India, human communities as endangered species, and predator versus prey dynamics within a Darwinian logic of survival. A shorthand for both India and the United States, animal metaphors expose a brutal world of danger, inequality, and corruption.
巴拉蒂·慕克吉笔下的动物
摘要:James Kim认为,“尽管长期以来一直注意到动物化和种族化之间的联系,但批判性动物研究尚未考虑它们与亚裔美国人研究的关系”(136)。关于这一更大的学术差距,南亚裔美国作家巴拉蒂·穆克吉(1940–2017)的研究尚未考察动物群在其作品中的重要性。追踪特定的动物隐喻——从鸟类到海洋哺乳动物,从爬行动物到犬科动物——本文通过密切的文本分析和使用批判性动物研究作为理论视角来面对这种批判性沉默。它比较了穆克吉对这些比喻的反复、经常是互文和互指的使用,并质疑了她的小说和散文所唤起的动物的文化和性别联想。穆克吉将印度动物形象写入美国文学,他被忽视的造物主题象征着梦想的力量、莫卧儿帝国在印度的衰落、作为濒危物种的人类社区,以及达尔文生存逻辑中捕食者与猎物的动态。作为印度和美国的缩写,动物隐喻暴露了一个充满危险、不平等和腐败的残酷世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信