A new war on nature and people: taking stock of the Colombian peace agreement

IF 4.6 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
T. Krause, N. Clerici, Jesica Murcia López, Paula Andrea Sánchez, Sandra Valencia, Juanita Esguerra-Rezk, Kristina Van Dexter
{"title":"A new war on nature and people: taking stock of the Colombian peace agreement","authors":"T. Krause, N. Clerici, Jesica Murcia López, Paula Andrea Sánchez, Sandra Valencia, Juanita Esguerra-Rezk, Kristina Van Dexter","doi":"10.1017/sus.2022.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-technical summary Almost 6 years have passed since the Colombian peace agreement was signed. However, the promise of a ‘Stable and lasting peace’ is slipping away as the transition towards peace is increasingly tainted and overshadowed with violence. The future of Colombia is at a crossroad and without international support and action taken to monitor global supply chains, these particular drivers of conflict, violence and environmental degradation will persist. We summarize the current situation and shed light on the complexities of building peace in Colombia, with a particular focus on the environmental changes that took place since the peace agreement was signed. Technical summary The Colombian peace agreement officially ended one of the world's longest internal armed conflicts. But the transformation of land use that takes place in the wake of the peace agreement has made the historic inequalities of access to land more visible and revealed inherent and violent struggles over resources that persist across the country. In this briefing we analyse the current status of peacebuilding in Colombia and highlight the major barriers and challenges in the current peacebuilding efforts. We show how the last few years brought severe and negative repercussions for people, communities and the natural environment in Colombia as cattle ranching, ‘productive agriculture’ and extractive industries are increasingly encroaching into indigenous territories, protected areas and forest ecosystems, replacing diverse natural forests that support biodiversity and contribute to human well-being locally and globally. The resurging presence of numerous armed groups seeking to control the profitable drug trade and mineral deposits are a major problem and obstacle for building lasting and sustainable peace among people and with the natural environment in Colombia. We conclude this briefing with points that we see as crucial to support the implementation of the peace agreement. Social media summary Colombia's peacebuilding effort must foster environmental stewardship and respect its biological and cultural diversity.","PeriodicalId":36849,"journal":{"name":"Global Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2022.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Non-technical summary Almost 6 years have passed since the Colombian peace agreement was signed. However, the promise of a ‘Stable and lasting peace’ is slipping away as the transition towards peace is increasingly tainted and overshadowed with violence. The future of Colombia is at a crossroad and without international support and action taken to monitor global supply chains, these particular drivers of conflict, violence and environmental degradation will persist. We summarize the current situation and shed light on the complexities of building peace in Colombia, with a particular focus on the environmental changes that took place since the peace agreement was signed. Technical summary The Colombian peace agreement officially ended one of the world's longest internal armed conflicts. But the transformation of land use that takes place in the wake of the peace agreement has made the historic inequalities of access to land more visible and revealed inherent and violent struggles over resources that persist across the country. In this briefing we analyse the current status of peacebuilding in Colombia and highlight the major barriers and challenges in the current peacebuilding efforts. We show how the last few years brought severe and negative repercussions for people, communities and the natural environment in Colombia as cattle ranching, ‘productive agriculture’ and extractive industries are increasingly encroaching into indigenous territories, protected areas and forest ecosystems, replacing diverse natural forests that support biodiversity and contribute to human well-being locally and globally. The resurging presence of numerous armed groups seeking to control the profitable drug trade and mineral deposits are a major problem and obstacle for building lasting and sustainable peace among people and with the natural environment in Colombia. We conclude this briefing with points that we see as crucial to support the implementation of the peace agreement. Social media summary Colombia's peacebuilding effort must foster environmental stewardship and respect its biological and cultural diversity.
一场针对自然和人类的新战争:回顾哥伦比亚和平协议
哥伦比亚和平协议签署至今已近6年。然而,随着向和平的过渡日益受到暴力的污染和阴影,“稳定和持久和平”的承诺正在溜走。哥伦比亚的未来正处于十字路口,如果没有国际支持和采取行动监测全球供应链,这些冲突、暴力和环境退化的特殊驱动因素将持续存在。我们总结了目前的局势,并阐明了在哥伦比亚建立和平的复杂性,特别着重于自签署和平协定以来所发生的环境变化。哥伦比亚和平协议正式结束了世界上最长的内部武装冲突之一。但是,在和平协议之后发生的土地利用的转变,使历史上在获得土地方面的不平等更加明显,并揭示了在全国各地持续存在的对资源的固有和暴力斗争。在本简报中,我们分析了哥伦比亚建设和平的现状,并强调了当前建设和平努力中的主要障碍和挑战。我们展示了过去几年如何给哥伦比亚人民、社区和自然环境带来严重的负面影响,因为畜牧业、“生产性农业”和采掘业日益侵占土著领土、保护区和森林生态系统,取代了支持生物多样性并为当地和全球人类福祉做出贡献的多样化天然林。试图控制有利可图的毒品贸易和矿藏的许多武装团体重新出现,这是在哥伦比亚人民之间以及与自然环境建立持久和可持续和平的一个主要问题和障碍。我们以我们认为对支持执行和平协定至关重要的几点来结束这次简报。哥伦比亚建设和平的努力必须促进环境管理,尊重其生物和文化多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Sustainability
Global Sustainability Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
19
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信