Affinity for Technology Relates to Group Cohesion for New, But Not Existing, Groups

Marlena R. Fraune, Danielle Langlois, Harrison R. Preusse, Jennifer Rheman, Katrina M. Ling, Katherine M. Tsui
{"title":"Affinity for Technology Relates to Group Cohesion for New, But Not Existing, Groups","authors":"Marlena R. Fraune, Danielle Langlois, Harrison R. Preusse, Jennifer Rheman, Katrina M. Ling, Katherine M. Tsui","doi":"10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2303182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, governments around the world mandated shutdowns and social distancing, limiting how much people could see other people outside of their household. Because of this, people had negative mental health outcomes, and many people turned to technology to maintain connections and create new ones. In this paper, we examine the relationship between technology, mental health, and group cohesion with existing groups (N = 202) and new groups (N = 74). We surveyed U.S. participants in June 2020, two to three months after the start of mandated social distancing. Results indicated that, as predicted, higher levels of reported group cohesion typically related to better reported mental health; however, the relationship occurred differently for existing groups compared to new groups. Further, higher levels of affinity for technology did not relate to group cohesion for existing groups, but did relate to more perceived cohesion for new groups. Researchers and mental health practitioners can use these results to help people develop a sense of group cohesion with new and existing groups and improve mental health during relative social isolation; technology may be especially beneficial for people to connect with new groups compared to existing groups.","PeriodicalId":74334,"journal":{"name":"OBM neurobiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OBM neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2303182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, governments around the world mandated shutdowns and social distancing, limiting how much people could see other people outside of their household. Because of this, people had negative mental health outcomes, and many people turned to technology to maintain connections and create new ones. In this paper, we examine the relationship between technology, mental health, and group cohesion with existing groups (N = 202) and new groups (N = 74). We surveyed U.S. participants in June 2020, two to three months after the start of mandated social distancing. Results indicated that, as predicted, higher levels of reported group cohesion typically related to better reported mental health; however, the relationship occurred differently for existing groups compared to new groups. Further, higher levels of affinity for technology did not relate to group cohesion for existing groups, but did relate to more perceived cohesion for new groups. Researchers and mental health practitioners can use these results to help people develop a sense of group cohesion with new and existing groups and improve mental health during relative social isolation; technology may be especially beneficial for people to connect with new groups compared to existing groups.
对技术的亲和力与群体对新的但不存在的群体的凝聚力有关
在2020年新冠肺炎大流行期间,世界各国政府强制要求关闭和保持社交距离,限制了人们在家庭之外与他人见面的次数。正因为如此,人们的心理健康状况出现了负面影响,许多人转向技术来维持联系并创造新的联系。在本文中,我们考察了技术、心理健康和群体凝聚力与现有群体(N=202)和新群体(N=74)之间的关系。我们在2020年6月对美国参与者进行了调查,当时距离强制保持社交距离已有两到三个月。结果表明,正如预测的那样,报告的群体凝聚力水平越高,通常与报告的心理健康状况越好有关;然而,与新组相比,现有组的关系发生了不同的变化。此外,对技术的亲和力水平越高,与现有群体的群体凝聚力无关,但与新群体感知到的凝聚力越强有关。研究人员和心理健康从业者可以利用这些结果帮助人们与新的和现有的群体建立群体凝聚力,并在相对社会孤立期间改善心理健康;与现有群体相比,技术可能特别有利于人们与新群体建立联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信