Controlled Future as a Factor of Human Behavior Intentionality

M. Repin, D. Dolganov
{"title":"Controlled Future as a Factor of Human Behavior Intentionality","authors":"M. Repin, D. Dolganov","doi":"10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-6-793-801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This theoretical and empirical study verifies the hypothesis that the desire to control one’s own future is a significant behavioral factor. A controlled future is a phenomenon at the intersection of internality and emotional response. The relationship between the level of internality and emotional response was analyzed at two levels. The first level featured stable personality traits. They were identified using standard personality questionnaires, namely the Standard Personality Traits Questionnaire modified by E. G. Ksenofontov and C. Izard’s Differential Emotions Scale adapted by A. V. Leonov and M. S. Kapitsa. The second level featured situational personal traits manifested in particular situations as a general state of emotional comfort or discomfort. The authors developed a questionnaire that included six types of situations, each of which had three response options. The first option presupposed a passive (external) position, i.e., waiting for help from others. The second option described an active (internal) position. The third option was intermediate (50/50). Each behavioral option required an assessment of emotional comfort. At the level of subjective-personal traits, the general level of personal internality determined the readiness for action and overcoming difficulties, often associated with negative emotional experiences. A lower readiness for action and transformation triggered stronger negative emotions. The level of situational behavior demonstrated a similar trend: a lower control over the situation was associated with a greater emotional discomfort. However, the relationship between control and emotional comfort was not linear. The level of emotional discomfort increased following the rise in the control level.","PeriodicalId":33387,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-6-793-801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This theoretical and empirical study verifies the hypothesis that the desire to control one’s own future is a significant behavioral factor. A controlled future is a phenomenon at the intersection of internality and emotional response. The relationship between the level of internality and emotional response was analyzed at two levels. The first level featured stable personality traits. They were identified using standard personality questionnaires, namely the Standard Personality Traits Questionnaire modified by E. G. Ksenofontov and C. Izard’s Differential Emotions Scale adapted by A. V. Leonov and M. S. Kapitsa. The second level featured situational personal traits manifested in particular situations as a general state of emotional comfort or discomfort. The authors developed a questionnaire that included six types of situations, each of which had three response options. The first option presupposed a passive (external) position, i.e., waiting for help from others. The second option described an active (internal) position. The third option was intermediate (50/50). Each behavioral option required an assessment of emotional comfort. At the level of subjective-personal traits, the general level of personal internality determined the readiness for action and overcoming difficulties, often associated with negative emotional experiences. A lower readiness for action and transformation triggered stronger negative emotions. The level of situational behavior demonstrated a similar trend: a lower control over the situation was associated with a greater emotional discomfort. However, the relationship between control and emotional comfort was not linear. The level of emotional discomfort increased following the rise in the control level.
作为人类行为意向性因素的可控未来
这项理论和实证研究验证了一个假设,即控制自己未来的愿望是一个重要的行为因素。受控的未来是一种内在性和情绪反应交叉的现象。从两个层面分析了内在水平与情绪反应之间的关系。第一层次具有稳定的人格特征。他们使用标准人格问卷进行识别,即E.G.Ksenofontov修改的标准人格特征问卷和A.V.Leonov和M.s.Kapitsa修改的C.Izard差异情绪量表。第二个层次的特点是在特定情况下表现出的情境个人特征,即情绪舒适或不适的一般状态。作者编制了一份问卷,其中包括六种情况,每种情况都有三种回答选项。第一种选择以被动(外部)立场为前提,即等待他人的帮助。第二个选项描述了主动(内部)位置。第三种选择是中间(50/50)。每个行为选择都需要对情绪舒适度进行评估。在主观个人特质层面,个人内在性的总体水平决定了行动和克服困难的准备程度,这通常与负面情绪体验有关。行动和转变的准备程度较低会引发更强的负面情绪。情境行为的水平表现出类似的趋势:对情境的控制越低,情绪越不舒服。然而,控制和情绪安慰之间的关系并不是线性的。情绪不适的程度随着控制水平的提高而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信