Dosimetric Comparison of two linear accelerator based radiosurgery system for Intracranial tumours with Rapid Arc and Dynamic conformal Arc therapy

Q3 Health Professions
V. Mhatre, P. Chadha, R. Chauhan, K. Talapatra, Abhaya P Kumar
{"title":"Dosimetric Comparison of two linear accelerator based radiosurgery system for Intracranial tumours with Rapid Arc and Dynamic conformal Arc therapy","authors":"V. Mhatre, P. Chadha, R. Chauhan, K. Talapatra, Abhaya P Kumar","doi":"10.22038/IJMP.2020.48162.1775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : Present study focused on dosimetric evaluation of Edge and Novalis Tx (NTx) linear accelerator (LA) based radiosurgery system by using rapid arc (RA) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) planning techniques.Materials and Methods: Forty patients with brain lesions of variable sizes (1.1-15.98 cc) were planned for Edge and NTx system by using RA and DCA planning techniques on eclipse treatment planning system version 13.6 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). All the plans were evaluated on the basis of paddick conformity index (PCI), homogeneity index (HI) and gradient index (GI). The maximum doses to organs at risk (OAR), V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy for healthy brain tissue were also evaluated for all the plans. The treatment delivery efficiency for both the systems was also evaluated. Results: The mean PCI and GI for both RA and DCA plans were found to be better in Edge as compared to NTx system (PCIEdge,RA=0.77±0.1, PCINTx,RA=0.66±0.11, PCIEdge,DCA= 0.69±0.12, PCINTx,DCA= 0.67±0.12). Significant difference in HI, doses to OAR and V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy brain volume was observed for both the systems with p-value less than 0.05. Reduced treatment time was observed in Edge LA as compared to NTx LA. Conclusion: Edge LA produced clinically better target volume conformity, rapid dose fall-off, reduced reduction in normal brain volume irradiation and treatment time compared to NTx. Thus in the set of patients plan evaluated it was noted that Edge stereotactic suite in more efficacious and diametrically suitable for intracranial radiosurgery.","PeriodicalId":14613,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2020.48162.1775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction : Present study focused on dosimetric evaluation of Edge and Novalis Tx (NTx) linear accelerator (LA) based radiosurgery system by using rapid arc (RA) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) planning techniques.Materials and Methods: Forty patients with brain lesions of variable sizes (1.1-15.98 cc) were planned for Edge and NTx system by using RA and DCA planning techniques on eclipse treatment planning system version 13.6 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). All the plans were evaluated on the basis of paddick conformity index (PCI), homogeneity index (HI) and gradient index (GI). The maximum doses to organs at risk (OAR), V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy for healthy brain tissue were also evaluated for all the plans. The treatment delivery efficiency for both the systems was also evaluated. Results: The mean PCI and GI for both RA and DCA plans were found to be better in Edge as compared to NTx system (PCIEdge,RA=0.77±0.1, PCINTx,RA=0.66±0.11, PCIEdge,DCA= 0.69±0.12, PCINTx,DCA= 0.67±0.12). Significant difference in HI, doses to OAR and V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy brain volume was observed for both the systems with p-value less than 0.05. Reduced treatment time was observed in Edge LA as compared to NTx LA. Conclusion: Edge LA produced clinically better target volume conformity, rapid dose fall-off, reduced reduction in normal brain volume irradiation and treatment time compared to NTx. Thus in the set of patients plan evaluated it was noted that Edge stereotactic suite in more efficacious and diametrically suitable for intracranial radiosurgery.
两种基于直线加速器的颅内肿瘤放射治疗系统在快速电弧和动态适形电弧治疗中的剂量学比较
摘要:本研究主要利用快速电弧(RA)和动态共形电弧(DCA)规划技术,对Edge和Novalis Tx (NTx)线性加速器(LA)放射手术系统进行剂量学评价。材料和方法:采用eclipse治疗计划系统版本13.6 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA)上的RA和DCA计划技术,对40例不同大小(1.1-15.98 cc)的脑病变患者进行Edge和NTx系统的计划。采用帕迪克一致性指数(PCI)、均匀性指数(HI)和梯度指数(GI)对各方案进行评价。评估了所有方案对健康脑组织的最大危险器官剂量(OAR)、V12Gy、V10Gy和V5Gy。还对两种系统的处理输送效率进行了评估。结果:与NTx系统相比,RA和DCA方案Edge的平均PCI和GI (PCIEdge,RA=0.77±0.1,PCINTx,RA=0.66±0.11,PCIEdge,DCA= 0.69±0.12,PCINTx,DCA= 0.67±0.12)均优于DCA方案。两组HI、OAR剂量及V12Gy、V10Gy、V5Gy脑容量差异均有统计学意义,p值均小于0.05。与NTx LA相比,Edge LA的治疗时间缩短。结论:与NTx相比,Edge LA在临床上具有更好的靶体积一致性,剂量下降快,正常脑容量照射减少和治疗时间缩短。因此,在一组患者计划评估中,我们注意到Edge立体定向套件更有效,更适合颅内放射手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (IJMP) is the official scientific bimonthly publication of the Iranian Association of Medical Physicists. IJMP is an international and multidisciplinary journal, peer review, free of charge publication and open access. This journal devoted to publish Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Technical Notes, Editorial and Letters to the Editor in the field of “Medical Physics” involving both basic and clinical research. Submissions of manuscript from all countries are welcome and will be reviewed by at least two expert reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信