At the Limits of the Consenting Subject: Chronotopic Formulations of Consent and the Figure of the Porn Performer

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Signs and Society Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1086/710312
Esra Padgett
{"title":"At the Limits of the Consenting Subject: Chronotopic Formulations of Consent and the Figure of the Porn Performer","authors":"Esra Padgett","doi":"10.1086/710312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article traces the 2015 controversy following porn performer Stoya’s accusation of rape by fellow performer James Deen, in which competing ideas about Stoya’s ability to consent circulated through popular and social media discourse. Focusing on the occupational class of porn performers, the article suggests that interpretations of sexual assault and notions of consent rely on particular models of personhood to prescribe and delimit definitions of who and how one can occupy a consenting (and thus, nonconsenting) subjectivity. The article introduces three chronotopic formulations of consent, spatiotemporal parameters for when and where consent is considered applicable, demonstrating how each is applied to a victim of sexual violence according to how the victim is interpellated as a particular kind of subject.","PeriodicalId":51908,"journal":{"name":"Signs and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/710312","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signs and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/710312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article traces the 2015 controversy following porn performer Stoya’s accusation of rape by fellow performer James Deen, in which competing ideas about Stoya’s ability to consent circulated through popular and social media discourse. Focusing on the occupational class of porn performers, the article suggests that interpretations of sexual assault and notions of consent rely on particular models of personhood to prescribe and delimit definitions of who and how one can occupy a consenting (and thus, nonconsenting) subjectivity. The article introduces three chronotopic formulations of consent, spatiotemporal parameters for when and where consent is considered applicable, demonstrating how each is applied to a victim of sexual violence according to how the victim is interpellated as a particular kind of subject.
在同意主体的限度:同意的时序表述与色情表演者的形象
本文追溯了2015年色情演员斯托亚(Stoya)指控同为演员的詹姆斯·迪恩(James Deen)强奸后的争议,在这场争议中,关于斯托亚的同意能力的不同观点在大众和社交媒体上流传。这篇文章关注的是色情表演者的职业阶层,认为对性侵犯和同意的概念的解释依赖于特定的人格模型来规定和界定谁以及如何占据同意(因此,不同意)主体性的定义。本文介绍了同意的三种时间顺序提法,即同意在何时何地被认为适用的时空参数,并展示了如何根据受害者作为一种特定主体被讯问的方式将每种提法应用于性暴力受害者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Signs and Society
Signs and Society Multiple-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信