Film is dangerous: ten years of censorship in Thailand’s cinema, 2010–2020

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 N/A ASIAN STUDIES
Sudarat Musikawong, Malinee Khumsupa
{"title":"Film is dangerous: ten years of censorship in Thailand’s cinema, 2010–2020","authors":"Sudarat Musikawong, Malinee Khumsupa","doi":"10.1080/0967828X.2022.2129429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The passing of the Cinema Act of 1930 marked the enforcement of the first official cinematic censorship measures in Thailand. However, it was constitutive censorship combined with official and expansive censorship practices enforced by the Film Censor Board that created an environment of self-censorship which is most dangerous for freedom of speech in cinema. The justification for banning films was that they constituted a threat to the nation – national security, unity, culture, religious values or good morality. In Thailand, the paramount framing of censorship is nationalism. Even in contemporary times, these nationalist formations of censorship are put into effect in the 2008 National Film and Video Act. This article analyses the expansive and subjective interpretation of national threat, especially the term of ‘morality’, which is not exclusive to film production, but extends into curatorial exhibitions and audiences’ access to cinema, an art form which is constrained by the censor/rating boards.","PeriodicalId":45498,"journal":{"name":"South East Asia Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South East Asia Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2022.2129429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The passing of the Cinema Act of 1930 marked the enforcement of the first official cinematic censorship measures in Thailand. However, it was constitutive censorship combined with official and expansive censorship practices enforced by the Film Censor Board that created an environment of self-censorship which is most dangerous for freedom of speech in cinema. The justification for banning films was that they constituted a threat to the nation – national security, unity, culture, religious values or good morality. In Thailand, the paramount framing of censorship is nationalism. Even in contemporary times, these nationalist formations of censorship are put into effect in the 2008 National Film and Video Act. This article analyses the expansive and subjective interpretation of national threat, especially the term of ‘morality’, which is not exclusive to film production, but extends into curatorial exhibitions and audiences’ access to cinema, an art form which is constrained by the censor/rating boards.
电影是危险的:2010-2020年,泰国电影审查制度的十年
1930年电影法案的通过标志着泰国第一次正式的电影审查措施的实施。然而,正是宪法审查制度与电影审查委员会实施的官方和广泛的审查制度相结合,创造了一个自我审查的环境,这对电影中的言论自由是最危险的。禁止电影的理由是它们对国家安全、统一、文化、宗教价值或良好道德构成威胁。在泰国,审查制度的首要框架是民族主义。即使在当代,这些民族主义的审查形式也在2008年的《国家电影和录像法》中得以实施。本文分析了对国家威胁的广泛和主观的解释,特别是“道德”一词,它不仅限于电影制作,而且延伸到策展展览和观众进入电影,这是一种受审查/评级委员会限制的艺术形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South East Asia Research
South East Asia Research ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Published three times per year by IP Publishing on behalf of SOAS (increasing to quarterly in 2010), South East Asia Research includes papers on all aspects of South East Asia within the disciplines of archaeology, art history, economics, geography, history, language and literature, law, music, political science, social anthropology and religious studies. Papers are based on original research or field work.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信