Weapon of the Discontented? Trans-River Migration as Tax Avoidance Practice and Lever in Eastern Bukhara

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY
Jeanine Dağyeli
{"title":"Weapon of the Discontented? Trans-River Migration as Tax Avoidance Practice and Lever in Eastern Bukhara","authors":"Jeanine Dağyeli","doi":"10.17885/HEIUP.TS.2017.1.23587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Until the early twentieth century, the border formed between contemporary Tajikistan and Afghanistan by the River Panj/Amu Darya was relatively easily traversable, even for larger groups of people with bulk loads and animals. Migration from one bank to the other was frequent and family units in riparian areas often had members on both sides of the river. Migration, especially collective outmigration, was, however, also an act of protest by dissatisfied peasants and pastoralists who sought to evade disproportionate or irregular taxes. Out-migration affected the interests of authorities and different social actors more intensely than other forms of evasive protest; it forced rulers or local authorities to negotiate terms of return, or contend with labour deficits, degradation of lands and irrigation structures, (cash) crop shortages, and unprotected border zones. Evasive tax flight and barter arrangements for return were a promising avenue for poorer population segments to pressure authorities for better conditions. This implied the involvement of mediators, community elders, local authorities, and others, who negotiated on behalf of the different stakeholders. This paper examines various incidences of evasive, trans-border migration in the late 19th and early 20th centuries against the background of British and Russian colonial encroachment and increasing marginalisation of these riparian regions and population regimes in the border lands. It argues that marginality equipped the local population with a lever for pressuring authorities, which, however, could also be turned against them.","PeriodicalId":42064,"journal":{"name":"Transcultural Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"169-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17885/HEIUP.TS.2017.1.23587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Until the early twentieth century, the border formed between contemporary Tajikistan and Afghanistan by the River Panj/Amu Darya was relatively easily traversable, even for larger groups of people with bulk loads and animals. Migration from one bank to the other was frequent and family units in riparian areas often had members on both sides of the river. Migration, especially collective outmigration, was, however, also an act of protest by dissatisfied peasants and pastoralists who sought to evade disproportionate or irregular taxes. Out-migration affected the interests of authorities and different social actors more intensely than other forms of evasive protest; it forced rulers or local authorities to negotiate terms of return, or contend with labour deficits, degradation of lands and irrigation structures, (cash) crop shortages, and unprotected border zones. Evasive tax flight and barter arrangements for return were a promising avenue for poorer population segments to pressure authorities for better conditions. This implied the involvement of mediators, community elders, local authorities, and others, who negotiated on behalf of the different stakeholders. This paper examines various incidences of evasive, trans-border migration in the late 19th and early 20th centuries against the background of British and Russian colonial encroachment and increasing marginalisation of these riparian regions and population regimes in the border lands. It argues that marginality equipped the local population with a lever for pressuring authorities, which, however, could also be turned against them.
不满者的武器?跨河移民:东布哈拉地区的避税实践与杠杆
直到20世纪初,当代塔吉克斯坦和阿富汗之间沿潘杰河/阿姆河形成的边界相对容易通行,即使是对携带散装货物和动物的较大群体来说也是如此。从一岸迁移到另一岸是频繁的,河岸地区的家庭单位通常有成员在河的两侧。然而,移民,特别是集体移民,也是不满的农民和牧民的抗议行为,他们试图逃避不成比例或不正常的税收。与其他形式的回避抗议相比,移民对当局和不同社会行为者的利益影响更大;它迫使统治者或地方当局就回归条款进行谈判,或应对劳动力短缺、土地和灌溉结构退化、(现金)作物短缺和无保护的边境地区。逃税和以物易物的回国安排是贫困人口向当局施压要求改善条件的一条有希望的途径。这意味着调解人、社区长老、地方当局和其他代表不同利益攸关方进行谈判的人的参与。本文研究了19世纪末和20世纪初,在英国和俄罗斯殖民侵占以及这些河岸地区和边境地区人口制度日益边缘化的背景下,发生的各种逃避性跨境移民事件。它认为,边缘化为当地居民提供了向当局施压的杠杆,然而,当局也可能对他们不利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Transcultural Studies is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal committed to promoting the knowledge and research of transculturality in all disciplines. It is published by the Cluster of Excellence “Asia and Europe in a Global Context: The Dynamics of Transculturality” of the Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信