INFLUENCE OF THE BRITISH COLONIALISTS ON WAQF PRACTICE IN PENANG, MALAYSIA: REFLECTIONS ON ITS LEGAL HISTORY

Q3 Social Sciences
Salehuddin Md. Dahlan, N. Mohamad, Nuarrual Hilal Md Dahlan
{"title":"INFLUENCE OF THE BRITISH COLONIALISTS ON WAQF PRACTICE IN PENANG, MALAYSIA: REFLECTIONS ON ITS LEGAL HISTORY","authors":"Salehuddin Md. Dahlan, N. Mohamad, Nuarrual Hilal Md Dahlan","doi":"10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous researchers’ general impression inferred that western colonialists contributed to the decline of waqf practice in the Muslim world. However, whether this statement is accurate in the case of the British colonial rule in Penang is uncertain. This research paper reviewed waqf practice in Penang under the British colonial rule. This paper also discussed how the colonial rule influenced and impacted waqf development in the state. Due to the nature of the study, doctrinal legal research methodology was employed, which involved examining law cases, legal provisions, policy documents, books, journal articles, and working papers. This study found that the British colonialists did not abolish waqf but improved its practice according to English trust and charitable laws. Unlike other colonialists, waqf practice under British rule in Penang had flourished, albeit with some flaws. The authors are convinced that this writing will provide a balanced perception of the colonialists and their hidden purpose in occupying the Malay states.","PeriodicalId":37075,"journal":{"name":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous researchers’ general impression inferred that western colonialists contributed to the decline of waqf practice in the Muslim world. However, whether this statement is accurate in the case of the British colonial rule in Penang is uncertain. This research paper reviewed waqf practice in Penang under the British colonial rule. This paper also discussed how the colonial rule influenced and impacted waqf development in the state. Due to the nature of the study, doctrinal legal research methodology was employed, which involved examining law cases, legal provisions, policy documents, books, journal articles, and working papers. This study found that the British colonialists did not abolish waqf but improved its practice according to English trust and charitable laws. Unlike other colonialists, waqf practice under British rule in Penang had flourished, albeit with some flaws. The authors are convinced that this writing will provide a balanced perception of the colonialists and their hidden purpose in occupying the Malay states.
英国殖民者对马来西亚槟城宗教基金实践的影响&对其法律史的思考
先前研究人员的总体印象是,西方殖民主义者对穆斯林世界waqf习俗的衰落做出了贡献。然而,在英国殖民统治槟城的情况下,这种说法是否准确是不确定的。本文回顾了英国殖民统治时期槟城的waqf实践。本文还讨论了殖民统治如何影响和影响该州的waqf发展。由于研究的性质,我们采用了理论法学研究方法,包括审查法律案例、法律规定、政策文件、书籍、期刊文章和工作文件。本研究发现,英国殖民者并没有废除waqf,而是根据英国信托和慈善法改进了waqf的实践。与其他殖民主义者不同的是,在英国统治下的槟城,尽管存在一些缺陷,但waqf的实践却很繁荣。作者相信,这篇文章将提供一个平衡的看法,殖民主义者和他们在占领马来国家的隐藏目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
UUM Journal of Legal Studies
UUM Journal of Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信