Method for Estimating Non-study Cigarette Use among Switchers to Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Ambulatory Clinical Studies

Mingda Zhang, J. Edmiston, G. Karles, Donna C. Smith
{"title":"Method for Estimating Non-study Cigarette Use among Switchers to Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Ambulatory Clinical Studies","authors":"Mingda Zhang, J. Edmiston, G. Karles, Donna C. Smith","doi":"10.21203/rs.2.14909/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background FDA is considering to establish a product standard to reduce nicotine in cigarettes to make them “minimally addictive or nonaddictive.” FDA has funded many clinical studies where smokers are switched to smoking low nicotine cigarettes to determine a nicotine ceiling that is appropriate for the protection of the public health. Unlike typical clinical trials involving pharmaceuticals or medical devices, ambulatory studies with low nicotine cigarettes face a unique challenge in that conventional nicotine non-study cigarettes are readily available to participants when protocols require them to exclusively use study cigarettes. As a consequence, protocol deviation in non-study product use is a major limitation common in such ambulatory studies, with up to 80 percent of participants using non-study cigarettes during the study. There is no published method for estimating the magnitude of such protocol deviation, i.e., the number of non-study cigarettes smoked by participants, in such studies.Methods We present a method for estimating the magnitude of noncompliance based on the proposition that the level of biomarker of exposure to a smoke constituent is proportional to the amount of the constituent per cigarette and the number of cigarettes smoked by participants. The method estimates the number of non-study cigarettes smoked by participants based on the discrepancies between the yield of smoke constituents (e.g., nicotine) and the level of the corresponding biomarkers measured in a study.Results Data from a confined study confirmed the validity of this method. Under-reporting on the magnitude of non-study cigarette use is widespread across studies using different low nicotine cigarettes. Participants in one of the largest published studies under-reported the number of non-study cigarette used by 79-90%.Conclusions Controlling and accurately estimating non-study cigarette use is critical for ambulatory low nicotine cigarette switching studies to ensure the resulting data can be appropriately evaluated to support science-based regulatory decision-making. In planning future studies, researchers should consider incorporating specific biomarkers that would enable objective assessment of both the prevalence and the magnitude of non-study cigarette use.","PeriodicalId":73437,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical research & trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical research & trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.14909/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background FDA is considering to establish a product standard to reduce nicotine in cigarettes to make them “minimally addictive or nonaddictive.” FDA has funded many clinical studies where smokers are switched to smoking low nicotine cigarettes to determine a nicotine ceiling that is appropriate for the protection of the public health. Unlike typical clinical trials involving pharmaceuticals or medical devices, ambulatory studies with low nicotine cigarettes face a unique challenge in that conventional nicotine non-study cigarettes are readily available to participants when protocols require them to exclusively use study cigarettes. As a consequence, protocol deviation in non-study product use is a major limitation common in such ambulatory studies, with up to 80 percent of participants using non-study cigarettes during the study. There is no published method for estimating the magnitude of such protocol deviation, i.e., the number of non-study cigarettes smoked by participants, in such studies.Methods We present a method for estimating the magnitude of noncompliance based on the proposition that the level of biomarker of exposure to a smoke constituent is proportional to the amount of the constituent per cigarette and the number of cigarettes smoked by participants. The method estimates the number of non-study cigarettes smoked by participants based on the discrepancies between the yield of smoke constituents (e.g., nicotine) and the level of the corresponding biomarkers measured in a study.Results Data from a confined study confirmed the validity of this method. Under-reporting on the magnitude of non-study cigarette use is widespread across studies using different low nicotine cigarettes. Participants in one of the largest published studies under-reported the number of non-study cigarette used by 79-90%.Conclusions Controlling and accurately estimating non-study cigarette use is critical for ambulatory low nicotine cigarette switching studies to ensure the resulting data can be appropriately evaluated to support science-based regulatory decision-making. In planning future studies, researchers should consider incorporating specific biomarkers that would enable objective assessment of both the prevalence and the magnitude of non-study cigarette use.
在门诊临床研究中,估计转入低尼古丁含量香烟的非研究卷烟使用量的方法
FDA正在考虑制定一项产品标准,以减少香烟中的尼古丁含量,使其“最低程度地成瘾性或不成瘾性”。FDA资助了许多临床研究,让吸烟者转而吸低尼古丁的香烟,以确定适合保护公众健康的尼古丁上限。与涉及药物或医疗设备的典型临床试验不同,使用低尼古丁香烟的门诊研究面临着一个独特的挑战,因为当协议要求参与者只使用研究香烟时,他们可以随时获得传统的尼古丁非研究香烟。因此,非研究产品使用的协议偏差是此类门诊研究中常见的主要限制,多达80%的参与者在研究期间使用非研究卷烟。目前还没有公开的方法来估计这种协议偏差的程度,即在这些研究中,参与者吸烟的非研究卷烟的数量。我们提出了一种估计不合规程度的方法,该方法基于暴露于烟雾成分的生物标志物水平与每支香烟的成分量和参与者吸烟的数量成正比的命题。该方法根据烟雾成分(如尼古丁)的产量与研究中测量的相应生物标志物水平之间的差异来估计参与者吸烟的非研究卷烟数量。结果一项限制性研究的数据证实了该方法的有效性。在使用不同低尼古丁香烟的研究中,普遍存在对非研究香烟使用程度的低报告。在一项已发表的规模最大的研究中,参与者少报了79-90%的非研究卷烟使用量。控制和准确估计非研究卷烟使用对于动态低尼古丁卷烟转换研究至关重要,以确保结果数据能够得到适当评估,以支持基于科学的监管决策。在规划未来的研究时,研究人员应考虑纳入特定的生物标志物,以便对非研究卷烟使用的流行程度和程度进行客观评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信