A feasibility pilot study of the effects of neurostimulation on dysphagia recovery in Parkinson’s Disease

A. Sasegbon, U. Hammerbeck, E. Michou, Ivy Cheng, Mengqing Zhang, C. James, S. Hamdy
{"title":"A feasibility pilot study of the effects of neurostimulation on dysphagia recovery in Parkinson’s Disease","authors":"A. Sasegbon, U. Hammerbeck, E. Michou, Ivy Cheng, Mengqing Zhang, C. James, S. Hamdy","doi":"10.12688/amrcopenres.13007.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Dysphagia often occurs during Parkinson’s disease (PD) and can have severe consequences. Recently, neuromodulatory techniques have been used to treat neurogenic dysphagia. Here we aimed to compare the neurophysiological and swallowing effects of three different types of neurostimulation, 5 Hertz (Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), 1 Hz rTMS and pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES).   Method: 12 PD patients with dysphagia were randomised to receive either 5 Hz rTMS, 1 Hz rTMS, or PES. In a cross-over design, patients were assigned to one intervention and received both real and sham stimulation. Patients received a baseline videofluoroscopic (VFS) assessment of their swallowing, enabling penetration aspiration scores (PAs) to be calculated for: thin fluids, paste, solids and cup drinking. Swallowing timing measurements were also performed on thin fluid swallows only. They then had baseline recordings of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from both pharyngeal and (as a control) abductor pollicis brevis (APB) cortical areas using single-pulse TMS. Subsequently, the intervention was administered and post interventional TMS recordings were taken at 0 and 30 minutes followed by a repeat VFS within 60 minutes of intervention. Results: All interventions were well tolerated. Due to lower than expected recruitment, statistical analysis of the data was not undertaken. However, with respect to PAs swallowing timings and MEP amplitudes, there was visual separation in a positive direction between active and sham groups for all interventions. Conclusion: PES, 5 Hz rTMS and 1 Hz rTMS are tolerable interventions in PD related dysphagia. Due to small patient numbers no definitive conclusions could be drawn from the data with respect to individual interventions improving swallowing function and comparative effectiveness between interventions. Larger future studies are needed to further explore the efficacy of these neuromodulatory treatments in Parkinson’s Disease associated dysphagia.","PeriodicalId":72183,"journal":{"name":"AMRC open research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMRC open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/amrcopenres.13007.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: Dysphagia often occurs during Parkinson’s disease (PD) and can have severe consequences. Recently, neuromodulatory techniques have been used to treat neurogenic dysphagia. Here we aimed to compare the neurophysiological and swallowing effects of three different types of neurostimulation, 5 Hertz (Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), 1 Hz rTMS and pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES).   Method: 12 PD patients with dysphagia were randomised to receive either 5 Hz rTMS, 1 Hz rTMS, or PES. In a cross-over design, patients were assigned to one intervention and received both real and sham stimulation. Patients received a baseline videofluoroscopic (VFS) assessment of their swallowing, enabling penetration aspiration scores (PAs) to be calculated for: thin fluids, paste, solids and cup drinking. Swallowing timing measurements were also performed on thin fluid swallows only. They then had baseline recordings of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from both pharyngeal and (as a control) abductor pollicis brevis (APB) cortical areas using single-pulse TMS. Subsequently, the intervention was administered and post interventional TMS recordings were taken at 0 and 30 minutes followed by a repeat VFS within 60 minutes of intervention. Results: All interventions were well tolerated. Due to lower than expected recruitment, statistical analysis of the data was not undertaken. However, with respect to PAs swallowing timings and MEP amplitudes, there was visual separation in a positive direction between active and sham groups for all interventions. Conclusion: PES, 5 Hz rTMS and 1 Hz rTMS are tolerable interventions in PD related dysphagia. Due to small patient numbers no definitive conclusions could be drawn from the data with respect to individual interventions improving swallowing function and comparative effectiveness between interventions. Larger future studies are needed to further explore the efficacy of these neuromodulatory treatments in Parkinson’s Disease associated dysphagia.
神经刺激对帕金森病吞咽困难恢复影响的可行性初步研究
引言:吞咽困难经常发生在帕金森病(PD)期间,并可能产生严重后果。最近,神经调节技术已被用于治疗神经源性吞咽困难。在这里,我们旨在比较三种不同类型的神经刺激的神经生理学和吞咽效果,5赫兹(Hz)重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)、1赫兹rTMS和咽电刺激(PES)。方法:将12例伴有吞咽困难的帕金森病患者随机分为5 Hz rTMS、1 Hz rTMSs或PES组。在交叉设计中,患者被分配到一个干预,并接受真实和虚假刺激。患者接受了吞咽的基线视频荧光透视(VFS)评估,从而能够计算出稀液、糊状物、固体物和杯子饮用的穿透-抽吸分数(PA)。吞咽时间测量也仅对稀液燕子进行。然后,他们使用单脉冲TMS对咽和(作为对照)拇短展肌(APB)皮层区域的运动诱发电位(MEP)进行基线记录。随后,进行干预,并在0和30分钟进行介入后TMS记录,然后在干预的60分钟内重复VFS。结果:所有干预措施耐受性良好。由于征聘人数低于预期,因此没有对数据进行统计分析。然而,就PAs吞咽时间和MEP振幅而言,对于所有干预措施,活动组和假手术组之间存在正向的视觉分离。结论:PES、5Hz rTMS和1Hz rTMS是PD相关吞咽困难的可耐受干预措施。由于患者人数较少,无法从数据中得出关于个体干预措施改善吞咽功能和干预措施之间比较有效性的确切结论。需要进行更大规模的未来研究,以进一步探索这些神经调节治疗对帕金森病相关吞咽困难的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信