A. Emecen, H. Caskurlu, P. Ergen, Y. Çağ, F. Arslan, H. Vahaboğlu
{"title":"The Direct Medical Cost of Regular Monitoring of Patients with HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection","authors":"A. Emecen, H. Caskurlu, P. Ergen, Y. Çağ, F. Arslan, H. Vahaboğlu","doi":"10.4274/vhd.galenos.2022.2021-12-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic infection (inactive carriers) account for most of the people living with hepatitis B virus (HBV). This study investigated the direct medical cost of monitoring patients within this group. Materials and Methods: A total of 293 outpatients receiving regular monitoring in a large university hospital were included in the study. Direct medical costs included laboratory tests, imaging, liver biopsies and co-payments. Linear mixed effect models were applied to investigate the effect of follow-up time on the annual cost of monitoring. We made quarterly, semi-annual and annual monitoring cost trajectories in accordance with international guideline recommendations. Results: The average annual direct medical cost per patient was 160 USD and the average laboratory visit cost per patient was 68.5 USD. HBV DNA testing contributed to a majority percentage of the total cost (59.6%). As follow-up time increased, the total annual cost ( β =-2.07) and annual cost for DNA testing ( β =-1.03) decreased. The cost trajectory of the first two years of monitoring remained above the semi-annual follow-up strategy. After three years, the cost trajectory of monitoring, while reducing slightly, remained between the semi-annual and annual follow-up strategy trend lines. Conclusion: Due to high-patient numbers, the total cost of monitoring presents a large economic burden. Taking into consideration the generally benign nature of the disease; the length of intervals between outpatient hospital visits could be reviewed and alternative strategies implemented with the aim of reducing expenditure.","PeriodicalId":42346,"journal":{"name":"Viral Hepatit Dergisi-Viral Hepatitis Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viral Hepatit Dergisi-Viral Hepatitis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/vhd.galenos.2022.2021-12-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic infection (inactive carriers) account for most of the people living with hepatitis B virus (HBV). This study investigated the direct medical cost of monitoring patients within this group. Materials and Methods: A total of 293 outpatients receiving regular monitoring in a large university hospital were included in the study. Direct medical costs included laboratory tests, imaging, liver biopsies and co-payments. Linear mixed effect models were applied to investigate the effect of follow-up time on the annual cost of monitoring. We made quarterly, semi-annual and annual monitoring cost trajectories in accordance with international guideline recommendations. Results: The average annual direct medical cost per patient was 160 USD and the average laboratory visit cost per patient was 68.5 USD. HBV DNA testing contributed to a majority percentage of the total cost (59.6%). As follow-up time increased, the total annual cost ( β =-2.07) and annual cost for DNA testing ( β =-1.03) decreased. The cost trajectory of the first two years of monitoring remained above the semi-annual follow-up strategy. After three years, the cost trajectory of monitoring, while reducing slightly, remained between the semi-annual and annual follow-up strategy trend lines. Conclusion: Due to high-patient numbers, the total cost of monitoring presents a large economic burden. Taking into consideration the generally benign nature of the disease; the length of intervals between outpatient hospital visits could be reviewed and alternative strategies implemented with the aim of reducing expenditure.