The effect of antibacterial agents of composite resin materials in dental caries prevention and reduction of flexural strength of the material: Systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.1 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
F. Nilchian, Neda Mosayebi, M. Tarrahi, A. Feiz, Omid Sadr, Yahya Forozande
{"title":"The effect of antibacterial agents of composite resin materials in dental caries prevention and reduction of flexural strength of the material: Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"F. Nilchian, Neda Mosayebi, M. Tarrahi, A. Feiz, Omid Sadr, Yahya Forozande","doi":"10.34172/johoe.2022.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial agents of composite resin materials, their efficacy in caries prevention, and their impact on the mechanical properties (flexural strength) of composite resin restorative materials. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, all published articles on the effects of antibacterial properties of composite resin materials in the prevention of dental caries (between 2005 to 2020) were evaluated using valid databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, ISI, Scopus, Cochrane, ProQuest, and Embase, found by searching the keywords \"anti-bacterial agents,\" \"composite resins,\" \"dental restoration,\" and \"dental caries\" according to the MeSH system. The context of the studies was extracted and subjected to modified CONSORT. The required data were extracted and analyzed with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Results: According to the results of the random effect model, the heterogeneity of biofilm colony forming unit (CFU) average was -1.90 (CI: -1.68 to -2.13). The mean value of the control group was higher than the intervention. The heterogeneity of flexural strength (FS) average was -11.92 (CI: -8.30 to -15.55). The mean value of the control group was higher than the intervention group. The heterogeneity of thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) absorbance average was -0.90 (CI: -0.65 to -1.14). The mean value of the control group was higher than the intervention group. Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that the antibacterial agents had a significant effect on the caries prevention properties of the composite resin materials; however, due to the bias related to different control groups, laboratory conditions, and mismatch between in vitro and in vivo conditions, more studies are needed in this regard.","PeriodicalId":41793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/johoe.2022.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial agents of composite resin materials, their efficacy in caries prevention, and their impact on the mechanical properties (flexural strength) of composite resin restorative materials. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, all published articles on the effects of antibacterial properties of composite resin materials in the prevention of dental caries (between 2005 to 2020) were evaluated using valid databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, ISI, Scopus, Cochrane, ProQuest, and Embase, found by searching the keywords "anti-bacterial agents," "composite resins," "dental restoration," and "dental caries" according to the MeSH system. The context of the studies was extracted and subjected to modified CONSORT. The required data were extracted and analyzed with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Results: According to the results of the random effect model, the heterogeneity of biofilm colony forming unit (CFU) average was -1.90 (CI: -1.68 to -2.13). The mean value of the control group was higher than the intervention. The heterogeneity of flexural strength (FS) average was -11.92 (CI: -8.30 to -15.55). The mean value of the control group was higher than the intervention group. The heterogeneity of thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) absorbance average was -0.90 (CI: -0.65 to -1.14). The mean value of the control group was higher than the intervention group. Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that the antibacterial agents had a significant effect on the caries prevention properties of the composite resin materials; however, due to the bias related to different control groups, laboratory conditions, and mismatch between in vitro and in vivo conditions, more studies are needed in this regard.
复合树脂材料抗菌剂在预防龋病和降低材料抗弯强度中的作用:系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:本研究旨在评价复合树脂材料的抗菌剂、防龋效果及其对复合树脂修复材料力学性能(抗弯强度)的影响。方法:系统回顾和荟萃分析2005年至2020年间发表的所有关于复合树脂材料抗菌性能在预防龋病中的作用的文章,使用PubMed、谷歌Scholar、Web of Science、ISI、Scopus、Cochrane、ProQuest和Embase等有效数据库,根据MeSH系统检索关键词“抗菌剂”、“复合树脂”、“牙齿修复”和“龋齿”,进行评价。提取研究的背景并进行改良的CONSORT。采用综合meta分析软件提取所需数据并进行分析。结果:随机效应模型结果显示,生物膜菌落形成单位(CFU)平均异质性为-1.90 (CI: -1.68 ~ -2.13)。对照组的平均值高于干预组。抗弯强度(FS)平均异质性为-11.92 (CI: -8.30 ~ -15.55)。对照组的平均值高于干预组。噻唑蓝溴化四唑铵(MTT)吸光度平均异质性为-0.90 (CI: -0.65 ~ -1.14)。对照组的平均值高于干预组。结论:抗菌药物对复合树脂材料的防龋性能有显著影响;然而,由于不同的对照组、实验室条件、体外和体内条件不匹配等因素的偏倚,这方面还需要更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology
Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信