Defining and finding an endgame in education on race

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jerel M. Ezell, Angie Torres-Beltran, S. Hamdi
{"title":"Defining and finding an endgame in education on race","authors":"Jerel M. Ezell, Angie Torres-Beltran, S. Hamdi","doi":"10.1177/17577438211052643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long regarded as the “great equalizer” across all social identity categories, including race/ethnicity, class, and gender, the education system plays a pronounced role in the curation and dissemination of knowledge on social stratification. In contemporary times, this role is perhaps no more evident than in academia’s gatekeeping role in discussions of race and racism. Contemporary racial injustice in the U.S. provides raw material for consideration of how the American education system in particular has articulated the forces that give rise to racial injustice and, in turn, how academia shapes--and also places itself inside and outside of--these conversations. Examining the pedagogy of “education on race,” this piece explores whether academia can be expected to meaningfully set a course for addressing systemic and structural racism, or indeed directly address it. Considering Foucault, Freire, and Bonilla-Silva’s interlocking arguments about the persuasive nature of power, we contextualize the emergence of corrosive academic \"love languages\" on race to explore how educational institutes produce and reproduce systems of oppression through gestures of racial solidarity that stop purposefully short of substantive action. We close with a proposal for using indigenous, empathy-focused interventions to generate impactful dialogue and action towards anti-racism in educational spaces and beyond.","PeriodicalId":37109,"journal":{"name":"Power and Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"82 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Power and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438211052643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long regarded as the “great equalizer” across all social identity categories, including race/ethnicity, class, and gender, the education system plays a pronounced role in the curation and dissemination of knowledge on social stratification. In contemporary times, this role is perhaps no more evident than in academia’s gatekeeping role in discussions of race and racism. Contemporary racial injustice in the U.S. provides raw material for consideration of how the American education system in particular has articulated the forces that give rise to racial injustice and, in turn, how academia shapes--and also places itself inside and outside of--these conversations. Examining the pedagogy of “education on race,” this piece explores whether academia can be expected to meaningfully set a course for addressing systemic and structural racism, or indeed directly address it. Considering Foucault, Freire, and Bonilla-Silva’s interlocking arguments about the persuasive nature of power, we contextualize the emergence of corrosive academic "love languages" on race to explore how educational institutes produce and reproduce systems of oppression through gestures of racial solidarity that stop purposefully short of substantive action. We close with a proposal for using indigenous, empathy-focused interventions to generate impactful dialogue and action towards anti-racism in educational spaces and beyond.
定义并找到种族教育的终点
长期以来,教育系统被视为跨越所有社会身份类别(包括种族/民族、阶级和性别)的“伟大均衡器”,在管理和传播有关社会分层的知识方面发挥着显著的作用。在当代,这一角色在学术界对种族和种族主义讨论中的把关作用可能并不比这更明显。当代美国的种族不公正现象为思考美国教育体系(尤其是美国教育体系)是如何明确表达导致种族不公正的力量,以及反过来,学术界是如何塑造——并将自己置于这些对话的内部和外部——提供了原始材料。这篇文章考察了“种族教育”的教学法,探讨了学术界是否可以有意义地为解决系统性和结构性种族主义设置课程,或者实际上直接解决它。考虑到福柯、弗莱雷和博尼拉-席尔瓦关于权力的说服性本质的相互关联的论点,我们将种族问题上具有腐蚀性的学术“爱的语言”的出现置于背景中,以探索教育机构如何通过种族团结的姿态产生和再现压迫系统,而这种姿态有目的地停止了实质性的行动。最后,我们提出了一项建议,即利用土著的、以移情为重点的干预措施,在教育空间及其他领域开展有影响力的反种族主义对话和行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Power and Education
Power and Education Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信