Students' Analytical Thinking Ability through the Strategy of Giving Feedback on Excretion System Learning

Yuni Astuti, Siti Aulia Febrianti, Budhi Akbar, Luthpi Safahi
{"title":"Students' Analytical Thinking Ability through the Strategy of Giving Feedback on Excretion System Learning","authors":"Yuni Astuti, Siti Aulia Febrianti, Budhi Akbar, Luthpi Safahi","doi":"10.22236/j.bes/537767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The ability to think analytically is one part of higher-order thinking skills, which should be owned by students according to the reference in the curriculum. Giving feedback is one of the efforts to support students' analytical thinking skills. Methods: The research used is Quasi-Experimental, with a Posttest-Only Control Design. The sampling technique used was Cluster Random Sampling. The research instrument was used through a test in the form of a description of 6 questions integrated into three indicators of analytical thinking ability (Differentiating, Attributing and Organizing). Results: showed that the average value of posttest analytical thinking ability in the experimental class was 63.67, which was greater than the control class, which was 56.63. Hypothesis testing through t-test at the 5% significance level obtained the value of tcount = 2.13 while ttable = 2.00, it is mean that tcount > ttable then H0 is rejected. Conclusions: The conclusion that can be formulated is that giving feedback has a significant effect on students' analytical thinking skills on the excretory system material, with the highest achievement indicator of analytical thinking ability achieved by indicators attributing.","PeriodicalId":33216,"journal":{"name":"Bioeduscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioeduscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22236/j.bes/537767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The ability to think analytically is one part of higher-order thinking skills, which should be owned by students according to the reference in the curriculum. Giving feedback is one of the efforts to support students' analytical thinking skills. Methods: The research used is Quasi-Experimental, with a Posttest-Only Control Design. The sampling technique used was Cluster Random Sampling. The research instrument was used through a test in the form of a description of 6 questions integrated into three indicators of analytical thinking ability (Differentiating, Attributing and Organizing). Results: showed that the average value of posttest analytical thinking ability in the experimental class was 63.67, which was greater than the control class, which was 56.63. Hypothesis testing through t-test at the 5% significance level obtained the value of tcount = 2.13 while ttable = 2.00, it is mean that tcount > ttable then H0 is rejected. Conclusions: The conclusion that can be formulated is that giving feedback has a significant effect on students' analytical thinking skills on the excretory system material, with the highest achievement indicator of analytical thinking ability achieved by indicators attributing.
排泄系统学习反馈策略对学生分析思维能力的影响
背景:分析思维能力是高阶思维技能的一部分,根据课程中的参考资料,高阶思维能力应为学生所拥有。给予反馈是支持学生分析思维能力的努力之一。方法:采用准实验的研究方法,采用仅测试后的控制设计。所使用的采样技术是聚类随机采样。该研究工具是通过测试使用的,其形式是将6个问题描述为分析思维能力的三个指标(区分、归因和组织)。结果:实验班的测试后分析思维能力平均值为63.67,高于对照班的56.63。在5%的显著性水平上,通过t检验进行假设检验,得到tcount=2.13的值,而ttable=2.00,这意味着tcount>ttable,那么H0被拒绝。结论:可以得出的结论是,给予反馈对学生对排泄系统材料的分析思维能力有显著影响,其中指标归因对分析思维能力的成就指标最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信