Writing Fear: Russian Realism and the Gothic by Katherine Bowers (review)

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Vaysman
{"title":"Writing Fear: Russian Realism and the Gothic by Katherine Bowers (review)","authors":"M. Vaysman","doi":"10.1353/see.2023.a897291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russian legal consciousness and juridical objectivity during the nineteenth century a ‘glorious but tragic episode’, which foundered on ‘formidable and eventually insuperable obstacles’ (see Wortman, ‘Russian Monarchy and the Rule of Law: New Considerations of the Court Reform of 1864’, Kritika, 6, 1, 2005, pp. 145–70 [p. 147]). In her conclusion, Schur points to the reassertion of conscience over the rule of law as the ultimate Russian legal arbiter during most of the twentieth century: ‘the ultimate travesty’, as she writes, ‘of merciful justice’ (p. 152). Perhaps Shakespeare, Dostoevskii and Saltykov-Schedrin were correct to be wary of lawyers’ eloquence: Lenin was one, after all.","PeriodicalId":45292,"journal":{"name":"SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW","volume":"101 1","pages":"157 - 159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/see.2023.a897291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Russian legal consciousness and juridical objectivity during the nineteenth century a ‘glorious but tragic episode’, which foundered on ‘formidable and eventually insuperable obstacles’ (see Wortman, ‘Russian Monarchy and the Rule of Law: New Considerations of the Court Reform of 1864’, Kritika, 6, 1, 2005, pp. 145–70 [p. 147]). In her conclusion, Schur points to the reassertion of conscience over the rule of law as the ultimate Russian legal arbiter during most of the twentieth century: ‘the ultimate travesty’, as she writes, ‘of merciful justice’ (p. 152). Perhaps Shakespeare, Dostoevskii and Saltykov-Schedrin were correct to be wary of lawyers’ eloquence: Lenin was one, after all.
《书写恐惧:俄国现实主义与哥特式》凯瑟琳·鲍尔斯著(书评)
19世纪俄罗斯的法律意识和司法客观性是一个“光荣但悲剧性的事件”,它在“可怕的和最终无法克服的障碍”中失败(见Wortman,“俄罗斯君主制和法治:1864年法院改革的新思考”,Kritika, 2005年6月1日,第145-70页)。147])。在她的结论中,舒尔指出,在20世纪的大部分时间里,良心对法治的重申是俄罗斯最终的法律仲裁者:正如她所写的那样,这是“对仁慈正义的终极嘲弄”(第152页)。也许莎士比亚、陀思妥耶夫斯基和萨尔提科夫-谢德林对律师的雄辩保持警惕是正确的:毕竟列宁就是其中之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW
SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Review is the oldest British journal in the field, having been in existence since 1922. Edited and managed by the School of Slavonic and East European Studies, it covers not only the modern and medieval languages and literatures of the Slavonic and East European area, but also history, culture, and political studies. It is published in January, April, July, and October of each year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信