U.S. Semiconductor Policy and South Korea: A Delicate Balancing Act between National Priorities and International Collaboration

IF 1.3
Seong-hyon Lee
{"title":"U.S. Semiconductor Policy and South Korea: A Delicate Balancing Act between National Priorities and International Collaboration","authors":"Seong-hyon Lee","doi":"10.1353/asp.2023.a903868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"executive summary:This article provides insights on how U.S. semiconductor policy is reported, discussed, and perceived in the South Korean public sphere and proposes potential actions for Washington and Seoul as allies.main argumentAlthough not widely known in Washington, the U.S. faces accusations of pursuing \"economic nationalism\" at the expense of its allies. There are growing perceptions in South Korea that the U.S. is prioritizing its own self-interests while concurrently emphasizing unity among its allies against China. This view has led to grievances about U.S. strategy, particularly in relation to the semiconductor sector and supply chains—sensitive topics in Northeast Asia's trade-focused economies. While the U.S. has advocated for an alliancecentered reorganization of semiconductor supply chains, concerns persist that it is ultimately pursuing semiconductor hegemony. Increasing public discontent in South Korea regarding U.S. semiconductor and technology policies serves as an illustrative example and could develop into a contentious issue for the broader alliance between the two countries unless handled with care and attention to South Korea's concerns. While Washington may disregard South Korean public sentiment as inconsequential, in South Korea's vibrant and vocal democracy, public opinion can quickly shift to the extremes and significantly influence Seoul's policy choices. To maintain a strong alliance with South Korea and effectively advance its policy regarding China, the U.S. must closely monitor South Korean public opinion and confront these concerns.policy implications • Economic sacrifices made by allies will not benefit U.S. national interests and may lead to disenchantment and resentment on the part of these partners. It is imperative that the U.S. engage in dialogue with its allies to enhance economic collaboration and explore new market opportunities.• The public uproar observed so far in South Korea's young democracy has the potential to suddenly turn volatile. Consequently, preventive public diplomacy by Washington can play a crucial role in managing the semiconductor issue.• A technology alliance commits countries to jointly secure their national interests; thus, mutual trust and a shared vision for the future are essential.","PeriodicalId":53442,"journal":{"name":"Asia Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.a903868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

executive summary:This article provides insights on how U.S. semiconductor policy is reported, discussed, and perceived in the South Korean public sphere and proposes potential actions for Washington and Seoul as allies.main argumentAlthough not widely known in Washington, the U.S. faces accusations of pursuing "economic nationalism" at the expense of its allies. There are growing perceptions in South Korea that the U.S. is prioritizing its own self-interests while concurrently emphasizing unity among its allies against China. This view has led to grievances about U.S. strategy, particularly in relation to the semiconductor sector and supply chains—sensitive topics in Northeast Asia's trade-focused economies. While the U.S. has advocated for an alliancecentered reorganization of semiconductor supply chains, concerns persist that it is ultimately pursuing semiconductor hegemony. Increasing public discontent in South Korea regarding U.S. semiconductor and technology policies serves as an illustrative example and could develop into a contentious issue for the broader alliance between the two countries unless handled with care and attention to South Korea's concerns. While Washington may disregard South Korean public sentiment as inconsequential, in South Korea's vibrant and vocal democracy, public opinion can quickly shift to the extremes and significantly influence Seoul's policy choices. To maintain a strong alliance with South Korea and effectively advance its policy regarding China, the U.S. must closely monitor South Korean public opinion and confront these concerns.policy implications • Economic sacrifices made by allies will not benefit U.S. national interests and may lead to disenchantment and resentment on the part of these partners. It is imperative that the U.S. engage in dialogue with its allies to enhance economic collaboration and explore new market opportunities.• The public uproar observed so far in South Korea's young democracy has the potential to suddenly turn volatile. Consequently, preventive public diplomacy by Washington can play a crucial role in managing the semiconductor issue.• A technology alliance commits countries to jointly secure their national interests; thus, mutual trust and a shared vision for the future are essential.
美国半导体政策与韩国:国家优先事项与国际合作之间的微妙平衡
执行摘要:这篇文章深入了解了美国半导体政策在韩国公共领域的报道、讨论和看法,并提出了华盛顿和首尔作为盟友的潜在行动。主要论点尽管在华盛顿并不广为人知,但美国面临着以牺牲盟友为代价追求“经济民族主义”的指控。韩国越来越多的人认为,美国在优先考虑自身利益的同时,也在强调盟友团结一致反对中国。这种观点引发了人们对美国战略的不满,尤其是在半导体行业和供应链方面,这是东北亚以贸易为重点的经济体的敏感话题。尽管美国一直主张对半导体供应链进行以联盟为中心的重组,但人们仍然担心它最终是在追求半导体霸权。韩国公众对美国半导体和技术政策日益不满就是一个例证,如果不小心和关注韩国的担忧,这可能会成为两国更广泛联盟的一个有争议的问题。尽管华盛顿可能会无视韩国公众的情绪,认为这无关紧要,但在韩国充满活力和声音的民主国家,公众舆论可能会迅速转向极端,并对首尔的政策选择产生重大影响。为了与韩国保持强有力的联盟并有效推进其对华政策,美国必须密切关注韩国公众舆论,应对这些担忧。政策影响•盟友做出的经济牺牲不会有利于美国的国家利益,可能会导致这些伙伴的失望和怨恨。美国必须与其盟友进行对话,以加强经济合作并探索新的市场机会。•到目前为止,在韩国年轻的民主国家中观察到的公众骚动有可能突然变得动荡。因此,华盛顿的预防性公共外交可以在管理半导体问题方面发挥关键作用。•技术联盟承诺各国共同确保其国家利益;因此,相互信任和对未来的共同愿景至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Policy
Asia Policy Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Asia Policy is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal presenting policy-relevant academic research on the Asia-Pacific that draws clear and concise conclusions useful to today’s policymakers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信