THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY SYMPTOMS WITH SIX CORE COMPONENTS OF SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES ADDICTION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN SERBIA

T. Jovanović, A. Višnjić, Marko Gmijović
{"title":"THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY SYMPTOMS WITH SIX CORE COMPONENTS OF SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES ADDICTION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN SERBIA","authors":"T. Jovanović, A. Višnjić, Marko Gmijović","doi":"10.5633/AMM.2021.0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It would seem that today the most important thing for many individuals is to have a good profile picture on online social networks. Accordingly, there is a serious possibility that addiction to social networking sites (SNS) can lead to psychosocial and mental disorders and other negative consequences on health-related issues. So, the aim of this study was to determine the association between the excessive use of social networking sites with the symptoms of depression and anxiety. This cross-sectional study was carried out at the University of Niš, Faculty of Medicine (Serbia) from September to December 2019. The study included 1,405 participants and all of them were assessed by using an appropriate questionnaire. The statistical analysis of the data included the binary logistic regression. The strongest predictor of whether one has high levels of depression symptoms was the state of conflict where the odds ratio (OR) was 10.28 (95% CI: 5.84 — 18.08). It has been observed that depression symptoms are also more common in those respondents with expressed withdrawal symptoms (OR = 4.27, 95% CI: 3.04 — 6.00), and with mood modification (OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.12 — 2.96). Anxiety symptoms, similar to those of depression, are most present in individuals with conflict state (OR = 10.31, 95% CI: 5.25 — 20.26), in those with withdrawal symptoms (OR = 6.83, 95% CI: 4.98 — 9.38), and then with mood modification (OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.60 — 4.07). The number of active accounts/profiles and number of devices, as well as state of salience and tolerance played no part in any of the cases. This study has shown a direct link between excessive SNS use and depression and anxiety symptoms. Further detailed research, especially longitudinal studies, is needed to understand the essential nature of these links. In any case, public health professionals should draw the attention of people, especially the younger population, in terms of limiting the use of social networks. Acta Medica Medianae 2021;60(1):28-37.","PeriodicalId":31409,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Medianae","volume":"60 1","pages":"28-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Medianae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5633/AMM.2021.0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

It would seem that today the most important thing for many individuals is to have a good profile picture on online social networks. Accordingly, there is a serious possibility that addiction to social networking sites (SNS) can lead to psychosocial and mental disorders and other negative consequences on health-related issues. So, the aim of this study was to determine the association between the excessive use of social networking sites with the symptoms of depression and anxiety. This cross-sectional study was carried out at the University of Niš, Faculty of Medicine (Serbia) from September to December 2019. The study included 1,405 participants and all of them were assessed by using an appropriate questionnaire. The statistical analysis of the data included the binary logistic regression. The strongest predictor of whether one has high levels of depression symptoms was the state of conflict where the odds ratio (OR) was 10.28 (95% CI: 5.84 — 18.08). It has been observed that depression symptoms are also more common in those respondents with expressed withdrawal symptoms (OR = 4.27, 95% CI: 3.04 — 6.00), and with mood modification (OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.12 — 2.96). Anxiety symptoms, similar to those of depression, are most present in individuals with conflict state (OR = 10.31, 95% CI: 5.25 — 20.26), in those with withdrawal symptoms (OR = 6.83, 95% CI: 4.98 — 9.38), and then with mood modification (OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.60 — 4.07). The number of active accounts/profiles and number of devices, as well as state of salience and tolerance played no part in any of the cases. This study has shown a direct link between excessive SNS use and depression and anxiety symptoms. Further detailed research, especially longitudinal studies, is needed to understand the essential nature of these links. In any case, public health professionals should draw the attention of people, especially the younger population, in terms of limiting the use of social networks. Acta Medica Medianae 2021;60(1):28-37.
抑郁和焦虑症状与社交网站成瘾的六个核心组成部分之间的关系:塞尔维亚的一项横断面研究
今天,对许多人来说,最重要的事情似乎是在在线社交网络上拥有良好的个人资料。因此,对社交网站的成瘾极有可能导致心理社会和精神障碍,以及对健康相关问题的其他负面影响。因此,本研究的目的是确定过度使用社交网站与抑郁和焦虑症状之间的联系。这项横断面研究于2019年9月至12月在尼什大学医学院(塞尔维亚)进行。该研究包括1405名参与者,所有参与者都使用适当的问卷进行了评估。数据的统计分析包括二元逻辑回归。一个人是否有高度抑郁症状的最强预测因素是冲突状态,其中比值比(OR)为10.28(95%CI:5.84-18.08)。据观察,抑郁症状在那些有明显戒断症状的受访者中也更常见(OR=4.27,95%CI:3.04-6.00),焦虑症状与抑郁症状相似,最常见于有冲突状态的人(OR=10.31,95%CI:5.25-20.26),有戒断症状的人(OR=6.83,95%CI:4.98-9.38),然后是情绪调节(OR=2.55,95%CI:1.60-4.07)。活跃账户/档案的数量和设备的数量,以及显著性和耐受性在任何情况下都没有起到作用。这项研究表明,过度使用社交网络与抑郁和焦虑症状之间存在直接联系。需要进一步的详细研究,特别是纵向研究,以了解这些联系的本质。在任何情况下,公共卫生专业人员都应该在限制社交网络的使用方面引起人们的注意,尤其是年轻人。医学媒体杂志2021;60(1):28-37。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信