Inflammation in embryology: A review of neuroinflammation in spina bifida

Q4 Neuroscience
Singh Nivrenjeet, S. Mohd-Zin, Singh Nisheljeet, A. Azizi, K. Palaniandy, Mohd Firdaus-Raih, M. H. Muhamad Ariffin, Nicholas Daniel Edward Greene, N. M. Abdul-Aziz
{"title":"Inflammation in embryology: A review of neuroinflammation in spina bifida","authors":"Singh Nivrenjeet, S. Mohd-Zin, Singh Nisheljeet, A. Azizi, K. Palaniandy, Mohd Firdaus-Raih, M. H. Muhamad Ariffin, Nicholas Daniel Edward Greene, N. M. Abdul-Aziz","doi":"10.31117/neuroscirn.v5i1.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The occurrence of neuroinflammation after the failure of neural tube closure, resulting in spina bifida aperta, is well established but whether or not neuroinflammation contributes to damage to the neuroepithelium prior to and during closure is not known. Neuroinflammation may occur at different time periods after perturbation to the developing spinal cord. Evidence suggests that early neuroinflammation is detrimental, whereas the later chronic phase of neuroinflammation may have useful roles. The role of neuroinflammation in neural tube defects is complex. It is important to make the distinction of whether neuroinflammation is important for neuroprotection or detrimental to the neural tissue. This may directly be influenced by the location, magnitude and duration of the insult, as well as the expression of neurotrophic or neurotoxic molecules. The current understanding remains that the chronic damage to the developing spinal cord is likely due to the chemical and mechanical damage of the exposed neural tissue owing to the aggressive intrauterine environment, described as the “two-hit mechanism”. Astrogliosis in the exposed spinal cord has been described in animal models of spina bifida after the failure of closure during embryonic life. Still, its association with neuroinflammatory processes is poorly understood. In this review, we will discuss the current understanding of neuroinflammation in neural tube defects, specifically spina bifida, and highlight inflammation-targeted strategies that may potentially be used to treat this pathophysiological condition.","PeriodicalId":36108,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Research Notes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31117/neuroscirn.v5i1.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The occurrence of neuroinflammation after the failure of neural tube closure, resulting in spina bifida aperta, is well established but whether or not neuroinflammation contributes to damage to the neuroepithelium prior to and during closure is not known. Neuroinflammation may occur at different time periods after perturbation to the developing spinal cord. Evidence suggests that early neuroinflammation is detrimental, whereas the later chronic phase of neuroinflammation may have useful roles. The role of neuroinflammation in neural tube defects is complex. It is important to make the distinction of whether neuroinflammation is important for neuroprotection or detrimental to the neural tissue. This may directly be influenced by the location, magnitude and duration of the insult, as well as the expression of neurotrophic or neurotoxic molecules. The current understanding remains that the chronic damage to the developing spinal cord is likely due to the chemical and mechanical damage of the exposed neural tissue owing to the aggressive intrauterine environment, described as the “two-hit mechanism”. Astrogliosis in the exposed spinal cord has been described in animal models of spina bifida after the failure of closure during embryonic life. Still, its association with neuroinflammatory processes is poorly understood. In this review, we will discuss the current understanding of neuroinflammation in neural tube defects, specifically spina bifida, and highlight inflammation-targeted strategies that may potentially be used to treat this pathophysiological condition.
胚胎学中的炎症:脊柱裂神经炎症综述
神经管闭合失败后发生神经炎症,导致脊柱裂,这一点已经得到了很好的证实,但神经炎症是否会在闭合前和闭合过程中对神经上皮造成损伤尚不清楚。神经炎症可能发生在发育中的脊髓受到干扰后的不同时间段。有证据表明,早期的神经炎症是有害的,而晚期的慢性神经炎症可能发挥有用的作用。神经炎症在神经管缺陷中的作用是复杂的。区分神经炎症是对神经保护重要还是对神经组织有害是很重要的。这可能直接受到损伤的位置、程度和持续时间,以及神经营养或神经毒性分子的表达的影响。目前的理解仍然是,对发育中的脊髓的慢性损伤可能是由于暴露的神经组织的化学和机械损伤,这种损伤是由侵略性的宫内环境引起的,被称为“双重打击机制”。胚胎期闭合失败后的脊柱裂动物模型中描述了暴露在外的脊髓中的星形胶质细胞增生。尽管如此,人们对其与神经炎症过程的关系知之甚少。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论目前对神经管缺陷,特别是脊柱裂的神经炎症的理解,并强调可能用于治疗这种病理生理状况的炎症靶向策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience Research Notes
Neuroscience Research Notes Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信