Comparison of monozygotic twins who received orthodontic treatment with self-ligated and conventional brackets: Case report

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ricardo Alves de Souza , Gregório Bonfim Dourado , Marcelo de Castellucci e Barbosa , João Batista de Paiva
{"title":"Comparison of monozygotic twins who received orthodontic treatment with self-ligated and conventional brackets: Case report","authors":"Ricardo Alves de Souza ,&nbsp;Gregório Bonfim Dourado ,&nbsp;Marcelo de Castellucci e Barbosa ,&nbsp;João Batista de Paiva","doi":"10.1016/j.odw.2017.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study objectived to compare the performance of different brackets, conventional and self-ligated, under similar conditions, in monozygotic twins<span> patients with severe tooth crowding<span>. It was evaluated the rapidness of treatment, chair time, quality of finalization, comfort and hygiene of the patients. The treatments had a duration of 24 months in both cases, however, with the conventional appliance, less time was required for performing alignment and leveling. Whereas, treatment with the self-ligated appliance required fewer appointments, and chair time was reduced about 20%. Both patients had satisfactory hygiene, and did not complain of discomfort during the treatment. The self-ligated appliance was not superior, as both cases presented similar results and were concluded at the same time.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":43169,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Waves","volume":"77 1","pages":"Pages 66-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.odw.2017.12.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Waves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344024117301048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study objectived to compare the performance of different brackets, conventional and self-ligated, under similar conditions, in monozygotic twins patients with severe tooth crowding. It was evaluated the rapidness of treatment, chair time, quality of finalization, comfort and hygiene of the patients. The treatments had a duration of 24 months in both cases, however, with the conventional appliance, less time was required for performing alignment and leveling. Whereas, treatment with the self-ligated appliance required fewer appointments, and chair time was reduced about 20%. Both patients had satisfactory hygiene, and did not complain of discomfort during the treatment. The self-ligated appliance was not superior, as both cases presented similar results and were concluded at the same time.

自结扎托槽与常规托槽正畸治疗的同卵双生儿比较:病例报告
本研究的目的是比较不同的托槽,传统和自结扎,在类似的条件下,对同卵双胞胎严重牙拥挤的患者的性能。评估治疗的快速性、坐诊时间、手术质量、患者的舒适度和卫生状况。在这两种情况下,治疗持续时间为24个月,然而,使用传统矫治器,进行矫直和调平所需的时间更少。然而,使用自结扎器治疗需要较少的预约,并且椅子时间减少了约20%。两例患者均具有良好的卫生习惯,在治疗过程中均未出现不适。自结扎矫治器并不优越,因为两例的结果相似,并在同一时间得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthodontic Waves
Orthodontic Waves DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Orthodontic Waves is the official publication of the Japanese Orthodontic Society. The aim of this journal is to foster the advancement of orthodontic research and practice. The journal seeks to publish original articles (i) definitive reports of wide interest to the orthodontic community, (ii) Case Reports and (iii) Short Communications. Research papers stand on the scientific basis of orthodontics. Clinical topics covered include all techniques and approaches to treatment planning. All submissions are subject to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信