Out of Intensive Care and Operating Theatre Intubations: Prospective Observational Study

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
W. Priyankara, E. M. Manoj, W. Samaranayake, A. Ranaweera
{"title":"Out of Intensive Care and Operating Theatre Intubations: Prospective Observational Study","authors":"W. Priyankara, E. M. Manoj, W. Samaranayake, A. Ranaweera","doi":"10.4038/slja.v30i1.8725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tracheal intubations are not infrequent out of ICUs and operating theatres and carry a substantial risk of adverse events. Our objective was t o study the current practices of tracheal intubations in medical wards of the national hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL). A prospective observational study was performed among all adult patients who had an endotracheal intubation in a medical ward of NHSL over a 6-month period. There were 47 intubations. Majority, 29 (61.7%) of intubations occurred during out of hours (after 4pm) and 23 (48.9%) of them were emergency intubations. Most common reason for intubation was respiratory distress 26 (55.3%). Other indications were cardiac arrest 11 (23.4%), Low GCS 7 (14.9%) and shock 2 (4.3%). Capnography and 2 laryngoscopes were not available during any of the intubations. Bougie was available only in 23 (48.9%) cases and alternative airway equipment were available only in 9 (19.1) cases. Midazolam was the most common induction agent 34 (72.3%). Majority 27(57.4%) of the intubators had less than 6 months of experience in anaesthesia. Most of the intubations 32 (68.1%) were done by a registrar and 6 (12.8%) were done by an intern medical officer. There were 39 adverse events during all intubations and hypotension 14(29.8%) was the most frequent adverse event. Therefore, we conclude that intubations in medical wards are done by less experienced doctors with lack of facilities and has high incidence of adverse","PeriodicalId":41531,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/slja.v30i1.8725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tracheal intubations are not infrequent out of ICUs and operating theatres and carry a substantial risk of adverse events. Our objective was t o study the current practices of tracheal intubations in medical wards of the national hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL). A prospective observational study was performed among all adult patients who had an endotracheal intubation in a medical ward of NHSL over a 6-month period. There were 47 intubations. Majority, 29 (61.7%) of intubations occurred during out of hours (after 4pm) and 23 (48.9%) of them were emergency intubations. Most common reason for intubation was respiratory distress 26 (55.3%). Other indications were cardiac arrest 11 (23.4%), Low GCS 7 (14.9%) and shock 2 (4.3%). Capnography and 2 laryngoscopes were not available during any of the intubations. Bougie was available only in 23 (48.9%) cases and alternative airway equipment were available only in 9 (19.1) cases. Midazolam was the most common induction agent 34 (72.3%). Majority 27(57.4%) of the intubators had less than 6 months of experience in anaesthesia. Most of the intubations 32 (68.1%) were done by a registrar and 6 (12.8%) were done by an intern medical officer. There were 39 adverse events during all intubations and hypotension 14(29.8%) was the most frequent adverse event. Therefore, we conclude that intubations in medical wards are done by less experienced doctors with lack of facilities and has high incidence of adverse
重症监护和手术室外插管:前瞻性观察研究
气管插管在重症监护室和手术室外并不罕见,并且有很大的不良事件风险。我们的目的是研究斯里兰卡国家医院(NHSL)内科病房气管插管的现状。一项前瞻性观察性研究对在NHSL医疗病房进行气管插管的所有成年患者进行了为期6个月的研究。共有47次插管。大多数情况下,29例(61.7%)插管发生在非工作时间(下午4点后),其中23例(48.9%)为紧急插管。插管最常见的原因是呼吸窘迫26例(55.3%)。其他指征是心脏骤停11例(23.4%)、GCS低7例(14.9%)和休克2例(4.3%)。在任何插管过程中都无法使用脑电图和2个喉镜。Bougie仅在23例(48.9%)中可用,而替代气道设备仅在9例(19.1)中可用。咪唑安定是最常见的诱导剂34(72.3%)。大多数插管者27(57.4%)的麻醉经验不到6个月。大多数插管32例(68.1%)由注册医生完成,6例(12.8%)由实习医生完成。所有插管期间共发生39例不良事件,低血压14例(29.8%)是最常见的不良事件。因此,我们得出结论,医疗病房的插管是由经验不足的医生完成的,他们缺乏设施,不良反应发生率很高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信