Ablative Volume of Radiofrequency Ablation Related to Intrahepatic Recurrence-Free Survival of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Nakarin Inmutto, Siripong Thaimai, Tanop Srisuwan, Thanate Kattipathanapong, Natthaphong Nimitrungtawee
{"title":"Ablative Volume of Radiofrequency Ablation Related to Intrahepatic Recurrence-Free Survival of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","authors":"Nakarin Inmutto, Siripong Thaimai, Tanop Srisuwan, Thanate Kattipathanapong, Natthaphong Nimitrungtawee","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1742654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate intrahepatic recurrence-free survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)\n Methods A retrospective cohort study of single HCC treated by RFA between 2015 and 2017. Fifty patients were enrolled in the study. Tumor volume and ablative volume were measured by using Syngo.via application (Siemen Healthineers, United States). Ablative volume classified into small and large ablative volumes. Ablative margin was evaluated by visual comparison between pre- and post-RFA images and classified into two groups: closed ablative margin (<0.5cm) and large ablative margin (>0.5 cm). The recurrence tumor was classified as local tumor progression (LTP) and intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR). The recurrence-free survival rate and independent risk for tumor recurrence were analyzed.\n Results Recurrence-free survival rate at the first, second, third, and fourth year after RFA was 83, 56, 44, and 44%, respectively. The average recurrence-free survival time in large ablative volume group was significantly longer than small ablative volume group (31.57 vs. 8.50 months, p = 0.003). A significant independent risk factor for tumor recurrence was large ablative volume (hazard ratio = 0.12, 95% confidence interval = 0.02–0.84, p = 0.033). The IDR group had ratio of actual ablative volume by ideal ablative volume (ablative ratio) higher than LTP group and nonrecurrent group.\n Conclusion The large ablative volume prevented tumor recurrence and increased recurrence-free survival rate. But aggressive ablation with high ablative volume ratio could increase risk of IDR.","PeriodicalId":32940,"journal":{"name":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate intrahepatic recurrence-free survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) Methods A retrospective cohort study of single HCC treated by RFA between 2015 and 2017. Fifty patients were enrolled in the study. Tumor volume and ablative volume were measured by using Syngo.via application (Siemen Healthineers, United States). Ablative volume classified into small and large ablative volumes. Ablative margin was evaluated by visual comparison between pre- and post-RFA images and classified into two groups: closed ablative margin (<0.5cm) and large ablative margin (>0.5 cm). The recurrence tumor was classified as local tumor progression (LTP) and intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR). The recurrence-free survival rate and independent risk for tumor recurrence were analyzed. Results Recurrence-free survival rate at the first, second, third, and fourth year after RFA was 83, 56, 44, and 44%, respectively. The average recurrence-free survival time in large ablative volume group was significantly longer than small ablative volume group (31.57 vs. 8.50 months, p = 0.003). A significant independent risk factor for tumor recurrence was large ablative volume (hazard ratio = 0.12, 95% confidence interval = 0.02–0.84, p = 0.033). The IDR group had ratio of actual ablative volume by ideal ablative volume (ablative ratio) higher than LTP group and nonrecurrent group. Conclusion The large ablative volume prevented tumor recurrence and increased recurrence-free survival rate. But aggressive ablation with high ablative volume ratio could increase risk of IDR.
射频消融体积与肝癌肝内无复发生存率的关系
意图 本研究的目的是评估肝细胞癌(HCC)在射频消融(RFA)后的肝内无复发生存率。方法 2015年至2017年间RFA治疗的单个HCC的回顾性队列研究。50名患者被纳入研究。肿瘤体积和消融体积通过使用Syngo.via应用程序(Siemen Healthineers,美国)测量。消融体积分为小消融体积和大消融体积。消融边缘通过RFA前后图像的视觉比较进行评估,并分为两组:闭合消融边缘(0.5 cm)。复发肿瘤分为局部肿瘤进展(LTP)和肝内远处复发(IDR)。分析无复发生存率和肿瘤复发的独立风险。后果 RFA后第一年、第二年、第三年和第四年的无复发生存率分别为83%、56%、44%和44%。大消融体积组的平均无复发生存时间明显长于小消融体积组(31.57个月vs.8.50个月,p = 0.003)。肿瘤复发的一个重要独立危险因素是消融体积大(危险比 = 0.12,95%置信区间 = 0.02–0.84,p = 0.033)。IDR组的实际消融体积与理想消融体积之比(消融比)高于LTP组和非复发组。结论 大的消融体积防止了肿瘤复发,提高了无复发生存率。但高消融体积比的积极消融可能会增加IDR的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信