COVID-19, inequality, and the intersection between wealth, race, and gender

IF 1.9 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Saths Cooper, A. Kramers-Olen
{"title":"COVID-19, inequality, and the intersection between wealth, race, and gender","authors":"Saths Cooper, A. Kramers-Olen","doi":"10.1177/00812463211015517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As this special issue goes to press, the COVID-19 pandemic will likely continue to be devastating communities, societies, and economies globally. This pandemic has touched all of humanity, forcing us to acclimate to a strange ‘new normal’ that belies our very nature – relatedness. The pandemic has compelled us to maintain physical distance, to wear masks that indelibly affect our ability to connect and communicate, to forsake rituals and rites of passage that anchor us, and for many of us, to lose loved ones, colleagues, and livelihoods. As with many disease outbreaks, the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed global and national fractures between the rich and the poor, the disadvantaged, and the privileged. It has spotlighted the glaring inequities in access to healthcare and highlighted the dire consequences of insufficiently investing in public health infrastructure and human resources. It has revealed how the responses of those in power and governance have impacted (in some cases positively, and in others, negatively) on the health and livelihoods of citizens globally. Very importantly, it has exposed how historical and systemic inequalities have continued to disadvantage communities and forefronted the risks inherent in the climate crisis. A recent Oxfam report titled ‘The Inequality Virus’ details how the COVID-19 virus has ‘exposed, fed off and increased existing inequalities of wealth, gender and race’ (Oxfam, 2021). While the world’s richest individuals and companies have already witnessed a financial recovery, for the world’s poorest individuals – the majority – economic recovery to pre-pandemic levels could take more than a decade (Oxfam, 2021). For those working in the informal economy, and in caring roles (predominantly women), the economic fallout has been pronounced (United Nations, 2020). Individuals most at risk include older people, people living with disabilities and pre-existing illnesses, as well as those living in poverty (United Nations, 2020). The Statistics South Africa Vulnerability Index (VIndex) uses 2011 census data to describe spatially and statistically the vulnerability status of South Africans to COVID-19 (Statistics South Africa, 2020). At-risk","PeriodicalId":47237,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Psychology","volume":"51 1","pages":"195 - 198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/00812463211015517","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00812463211015517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As this special issue goes to press, the COVID-19 pandemic will likely continue to be devastating communities, societies, and economies globally. This pandemic has touched all of humanity, forcing us to acclimate to a strange ‘new normal’ that belies our very nature – relatedness. The pandemic has compelled us to maintain physical distance, to wear masks that indelibly affect our ability to connect and communicate, to forsake rituals and rites of passage that anchor us, and for many of us, to lose loved ones, colleagues, and livelihoods. As with many disease outbreaks, the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed global and national fractures between the rich and the poor, the disadvantaged, and the privileged. It has spotlighted the glaring inequities in access to healthcare and highlighted the dire consequences of insufficiently investing in public health infrastructure and human resources. It has revealed how the responses of those in power and governance have impacted (in some cases positively, and in others, negatively) on the health and livelihoods of citizens globally. Very importantly, it has exposed how historical and systemic inequalities have continued to disadvantage communities and forefronted the risks inherent in the climate crisis. A recent Oxfam report titled ‘The Inequality Virus’ details how the COVID-19 virus has ‘exposed, fed off and increased existing inequalities of wealth, gender and race’ (Oxfam, 2021). While the world’s richest individuals and companies have already witnessed a financial recovery, for the world’s poorest individuals – the majority – economic recovery to pre-pandemic levels could take more than a decade (Oxfam, 2021). For those working in the informal economy, and in caring roles (predominantly women), the economic fallout has been pronounced (United Nations, 2020). Individuals most at risk include older people, people living with disabilities and pre-existing illnesses, as well as those living in poverty (United Nations, 2020). The Statistics South Africa Vulnerability Index (VIndex) uses 2011 census data to describe spatially and statistically the vulnerability status of South Africans to COVID-19 (Statistics South Africa, 2020). At-risk
新冠肺炎、不平等以及财富、种族和性别之间的交叉
随着本期特刊的出版,新冠肺炎大流行可能会继续对全球社区、社会和经济造成破坏。这场疫情感动了全人类,迫使我们适应一种奇怪的“新常态”,这种常态掩盖了我们的本性——相关性。新冠疫情迫使我们保持身体距离,戴上口罩,这将永远影响我们的联系和沟通能力,放弃让我们锚定的仪式和成年礼,对我们中的许多人来说,失去亲人、同事和生计。与许多疾病暴发一样,新冠肺炎大流行暴露了全球和国家贫富、弱势和特权之间的裂痕。它突出了在获得医疗保健方面的明显不平等,并强调了对公共卫生基础设施和人力资源投资不足的可怕后果。它揭示了当权者和治理者的反应如何对全球公民的健康和生计产生影响(在某些情况下是积极的,在另一些情况下是消极的)。非常重要的是,它暴露了历史和系统性的不平等如何继续使社区处于不利地位,并突出了气候危机固有的风险。乐施会最近的一份题为“不平等病毒”的报告详细说明了新冠肺炎病毒如何“暴露、助长和加剧了现有的财富、性别和种族不平等”(乐施会,2021)。虽然世界上最富有的个人和公司已经见证了金融复苏,但对于世界上最贫穷的个人——大多数人——来说,经济恢复到疫情前的水平可能需要十多年的时间(乐施会,2021)。对于那些在非正规经济中工作并担任照顾角色的人(主要是女性)来说,经济后果是明显的(联合国,2020年)。风险最大的个人包括老年人、残疾人和已有疾病的人,以及生活在贫困中的人(联合国,2020年)。南非统计局脆弱性指数(VIndex)使用2011年人口普查数据,从空间和统计角度描述南非人对新冠肺炎的脆弱性状况(南非统计局,2020年)。有风险
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Journal of Psychology
South African Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Psychology publishes contributions in English from all fields of psychology. While the emphasis is on empirical research, the Journal also accepts theoretical and methodological papers, review articles, short communications, reviews and letters containing fair commentary. Priority is given to articles which are relevant to Africa and which address psychological issues of social change and development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信