{"title":"One life heals another: Beginnings, maturity, outcomes of a vocation","authors":"G. Maniadakis","doi":"10.1080/0803706X.2022.2063583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"must run twice as fast as that” (Carroll, 1865; reprint 1993, p. 79). On the other hand, it is clear in psychoanalysis there is little consensus: when discussing analytic techniques Charles Brenner wrote: “All are agreed that an analyst listens while the patient talks and then intervenes at what is considered to be an appropriate time, but there agreement ends” (Brenner, 2007, p. 49). However, there are also some surprises. Stefana makes a continuous and constant crosslink between the theoretical positions of the various scholars. This allows the reader to “fly” from one continent to another, following the clinical and theoretical manifestations of the concept of countertransference. Thus we can appreciate authors who remain adherent to the clinic and the therapeutic encounter with the patient, and others who slide towards theories that can appear decidedly abstract. In fact, by reading these pages over and over, new things can be found. Sometimes we pause to reflect on a sentence; other times we are induced to explore other books and correspondence. Sometimes, the reader can take notes to follow up their curiosity of wanting to know more: for example, to gain more knowledge on the Scottish psychoanalyst Denis V. Carpy, or on Otto Gross’s (mutual) analysis with Jung. Stefana closes his work with a chapter called “Some non-conclusive considerations”. Wisely, he writes:","PeriodicalId":43212,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Psychoanalysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0803706X.2022.2063583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
must run twice as fast as that” (Carroll, 1865; reprint 1993, p. 79). On the other hand, it is clear in psychoanalysis there is little consensus: when discussing analytic techniques Charles Brenner wrote: “All are agreed that an analyst listens while the patient talks and then intervenes at what is considered to be an appropriate time, but there agreement ends” (Brenner, 2007, p. 49). However, there are also some surprises. Stefana makes a continuous and constant crosslink between the theoretical positions of the various scholars. This allows the reader to “fly” from one continent to another, following the clinical and theoretical manifestations of the concept of countertransference. Thus we can appreciate authors who remain adherent to the clinic and the therapeutic encounter with the patient, and others who slide towards theories that can appear decidedly abstract. In fact, by reading these pages over and over, new things can be found. Sometimes we pause to reflect on a sentence; other times we are induced to explore other books and correspondence. Sometimes, the reader can take notes to follow up their curiosity of wanting to know more: for example, to gain more knowledge on the Scottish psychoanalyst Denis V. Carpy, or on Otto Gross’s (mutual) analysis with Jung. Stefana closes his work with a chapter called “Some non-conclusive considerations”. Wisely, he writes:
必须跑得比那快一倍”(卡罗尔,1865;1993年再版,第79页)。另一方面,很明显,在精神分析中很少有共识:当讨论分析技术时,查尔斯·布伦纳写道:“所有人都同意,当病人说话时,分析师会倾听,然后在被认为是适当的时间进行干预,但他们的意见是一致的”(布伦纳,2007年,第49页)。然而,也有一些惊喜。Stefana在各种学者的理论立场之间建立了持续不断的联系。这允许读者从一个大陆“飞”到另一个大陆,跟随反移情概念的临床和理论表现。因此,我们可以欣赏那些坚持临床和与病人的治疗接触的作者,以及那些滑向可以明显抽象的理论的人。事实上,通过反复阅读这些页面,你会发现新的东西。有时我们停下来思考一句话;其他时候,我们被诱导去探索其他的书籍和信件。有时,读者可以通过做笔记来满足他们想要了解更多的好奇心:例如,为了获得更多关于苏格兰精神分析学家丹尼斯·v·卡比(Denis V. Carpy)的知识,或者关于奥托·格罗斯(Otto Gross)与荣格(Jung)的(相互)分析。Stefana以“一些非结论性的考虑”一章结束了他的著作。他明智地写道: