Healthcare staff perceptions of integrated care in a programme for complex chronic patients admitted to hospital because of heart failure (ProMIC)

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING
C. Domingo, Iratxe Regidor, E. Alonso, A. Besga, D. Orozco, R. Nuño
{"title":"Healthcare staff perceptions of integrated care in a programme for complex chronic patients admitted to hospital because of heart failure (ProMIC)","authors":"C. Domingo, Iratxe Regidor, E. Alonso, A. Besga, D. Orozco, R. Nuño","doi":"10.1177/2053434519840458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Patients with heart failure are usually a frail population characterised by complex care needs. To ensure an integrated care approach, it is necessary to work collaboratively across organisational boundaries. The purpose of this study is to measure and understand the perception of collaboration between clinicians participating in a comprehensive care programme for patients with heart failure, known as PROMIC. Methods A sequential mixed-method study design was used. A sample of PROMIC clinicians completed a survey in which they evaluated 10 dimensions of collaboration in 2010 and in 2014. The perspectives of clinicians were studied more in depth in a focus group in 2012, which was analysed using content analysis. Outcomes: Professionals’ perception of collaboration showed an improvement by 1.18 points (53%) over the period 2010–14. The comprehensive programme proved to be of major support to the professionals. Sometimes, the study participants did not feel prepared to manage cases due to the complexity of the situations with regard to patients’ care. Both, the quantitative and the qualitative methods, showed up a congruent information about the positive perception of participants of the programme itself and the collaboration. Discussion The complexity of care processes and the need for continuity of care mean that large-scale collaboration is necessary between care levels as well as major interdisciplinary teamwork, to achieve the best possible outcomes in terms of health. ProMIC intervention has helped to improve professionals’ perception in terms of collaboration between levels.","PeriodicalId":43751,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Coordination","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2053434519840458","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Coordination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2053434519840458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction Patients with heart failure are usually a frail population characterised by complex care needs. To ensure an integrated care approach, it is necessary to work collaboratively across organisational boundaries. The purpose of this study is to measure and understand the perception of collaboration between clinicians participating in a comprehensive care programme for patients with heart failure, known as PROMIC. Methods A sequential mixed-method study design was used. A sample of PROMIC clinicians completed a survey in which they evaluated 10 dimensions of collaboration in 2010 and in 2014. The perspectives of clinicians were studied more in depth in a focus group in 2012, which was analysed using content analysis. Outcomes: Professionals’ perception of collaboration showed an improvement by 1.18 points (53%) over the period 2010–14. The comprehensive programme proved to be of major support to the professionals. Sometimes, the study participants did not feel prepared to manage cases due to the complexity of the situations with regard to patients’ care. Both, the quantitative and the qualitative methods, showed up a congruent information about the positive perception of participants of the programme itself and the collaboration. Discussion The complexity of care processes and the need for continuity of care mean that large-scale collaboration is necessary between care levels as well as major interdisciplinary teamwork, to achieve the best possible outcomes in terms of health. ProMIC intervention has helped to improve professionals’ perception in terms of collaboration between levels.
医护人员对因心力衰竭入院的复杂慢性患者项目中综合护理的看法(ProMIC)
引言心力衰竭患者通常是一个身体虚弱的群体,其特点是需要复杂的护理。为了确保综合护理方法,有必要跨越组织边界进行合作。这项研究的目的是测量和了解参与心力衰竭患者综合护理计划(PROMIC)的临床医生之间的合作感受。方法采用序贯混合法研究设计。PROMIC临床医生的样本完成了一项调查,他们在2010年和2014年评估了合作的10个维度。2012年,一个焦点小组对临床医生的观点进行了更深入的研究,并使用内容分析进行了分析。结果:在2010-2014年期间,专业人员对合作的认知提高了1.18个百分点(53%)。事实证明,该综合方案对专业人员具有重大支持作用。有时,由于患者护理情况的复杂性,研究参与者觉得没有做好处理病例的准备。定量和定性方法都显示了参与者对方案本身和合作的积极看法的一致信息。讨论护理过程的复杂性和护理连续性的必要性意味着护理级别之间的大规模合作以及主要的跨学科团队合作是必要的,以在健康方面取得尽可能好的结果。ProMIC干预有助于改善专业人员对各级合作的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Care Coordination (formerly published as the International Journal of Care Pathways) provides an international forum for the latest scientific research in care coordination. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles which describe basic research to a multidisciplinary field as well as other broader approaches and strategies hypothesized to improve care coordination. The Journal offers insightful overviews and reflections on innovation, underlying issues, and thought provoking opinion pieces in related fields. Articles from multidisciplinary fields are welcomed from leading health care academics and policy-makers. Published articles types include original research, reviews, guidelines papers, book reviews, and news items.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信