COVID-19 restrictions on religious worship:how to ensure effectiveness while respecting religious autonomy?

Maksymilian Hau
{"title":"COVID-19 restrictions on religious worship:how to ensure effectiveness while respecting religious autonomy?","authors":"Maksymilian Hau","doi":"10.54103/1971-8543/18820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Introduction - 2. The existing model of Coronavirus restrictions and its impact on freedom of religion - 3. Towards a new model of restriction - 4. Advantages of the new model of restrictions - 5. Safeguarding compliance with restrictions - 6. Conclusions. \nABSTRACT: The topic of the article is to evaluate legal measures aimed to stop the spread of the coronavirus that limited religious rights. The restrictions are assessed from the perspective of its effectiveness in preventing infection as well as its proportionality. The argument is that proportionality of the restrictions depends on their effectiveness, which in turn should be evaluated in the light of current pandemic situation, which includes vaccination level and scientific knowledge on coronavirus transmission. Consequently, two kinds of restrictions are distinguished: premises-oriented and activities-oriented. The former focuses mainly on the capacity of the church premises and not so much on the activity of the gathered, whereas the latter pays attention to the activates of the worshippers, including religious practices. Given the epidemiological effectiveness and the balance between protecting public health and religious freedom, activities-oriented restrictions are identified as a proper model of restrictions.","PeriodicalId":30314,"journal":{"name":"Stato Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stato Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1971-8543/18820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Introduction - 2. The existing model of Coronavirus restrictions and its impact on freedom of religion - 3. Towards a new model of restriction - 4. Advantages of the new model of restrictions - 5. Safeguarding compliance with restrictions - 6. Conclusions. ABSTRACT: The topic of the article is to evaluate legal measures aimed to stop the spread of the coronavirus that limited religious rights. The restrictions are assessed from the perspective of its effectiveness in preventing infection as well as its proportionality. The argument is that proportionality of the restrictions depends on their effectiveness, which in turn should be evaluated in the light of current pandemic situation, which includes vaccination level and scientific knowledge on coronavirus transmission. Consequently, two kinds of restrictions are distinguished: premises-oriented and activities-oriented. The former focuses mainly on the capacity of the church premises and not so much on the activity of the gathered, whereas the latter pays attention to the activates of the worshippers, including religious practices. Given the epidemiological effectiveness and the balance between protecting public health and religious freedom, activities-oriented restrictions are identified as a proper model of restrictions.
新冠肺炎对宗教礼拜的限制:如何在尊重宗教自主权的同时确保有效性?
目录:1。简介-2。现有的冠状病毒限制模式及其对宗教自由的影响-3。走向一种新的限制模式-4。新限制模式的优点-5。保护遵守限制-6。结论。摘要:本文的主题是评估旨在阻止限制宗教权利的冠状病毒传播的法律措施。这些限制措施是从预防感染的有效性及其相称性的角度进行评估的。理由是,限制措施的相称性取决于其有效性,而有效性又应根据当前的疫情情况进行评估,其中包括疫苗接种水平和冠状病毒传播的科学知识。因此,区分了两种限制:前提导向和活动导向。前者主要关注教堂场所的容量,而不是会众的活动,而后者则关注礼拜者的活动,包括宗教实践。鉴于流行病学的有效性以及保护公众健康和宗教自由之间的平衡,以活动为导向的限制被认为是一种适当的限制模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信